Regional Differences in and Influencing Factors of Animal Epidemic Risk in China

Based on data from three major pig diseases, this study calculated the animal disease epidemic index of 31 provinces and autonomous regions in mainland China. We adopted the Gini coefficient to investigate the interregional differences in animal disease epidemic risk and used the Shapley value decom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yanling Li, Long Sun, Wei Zhou, Qingsong Su
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2020.00520/full
id doaj-24a190cc68d2426fa96eca128ab642ff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-24a190cc68d2426fa96eca128ab642ff2020-11-25T03:28:25ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692020-09-01710.3389/fvets.2020.00520539948Regional Differences in and Influencing Factors of Animal Epidemic Risk in ChinaYanling Li0Long Sun1Wei Zhou2Qingsong Su3College of Public Administration and Law, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, ChinaCollege of Public Administration and Law, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, ChinaCollege of Public Administration and Law, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, ChinaCollege of Humanities and Development Studies, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaBased on data from three major pig diseases, this study calculated the animal disease epidemic index of 31 provinces and autonomous regions in mainland China. We adopted the Gini coefficient to investigate the interregional differences in animal disease epidemic risk and used the Shapley value decomposition method to illustrate the contribution of influencing factors. The results showed that the Gini coefficient remains above 0.60, indicating significant interregional differences in mainland China. Animal breeding level, ecological environment, and animal disease prevention and control contribute most to the interregional differences in animal epidemic risk. The results imply that reducing sewage discharge, increasing pig production, and changing the breeding style from free-range to large-scale farming are measures that may help improve disease prevention and control. This study has implications for providing theoretical references for preventing and controlling animal epidemics and for improving public health governance.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2020.00520/fullanimal epidemic riskinfluencing factorsregional differenceShapley valueepidemic risk index
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yanling Li
Long Sun
Wei Zhou
Qingsong Su
spellingShingle Yanling Li
Long Sun
Wei Zhou
Qingsong Su
Regional Differences in and Influencing Factors of Animal Epidemic Risk in China
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
animal epidemic risk
influencing factors
regional difference
Shapley value
epidemic risk index
author_facet Yanling Li
Long Sun
Wei Zhou
Qingsong Su
author_sort Yanling Li
title Regional Differences in and Influencing Factors of Animal Epidemic Risk in China
title_short Regional Differences in and Influencing Factors of Animal Epidemic Risk in China
title_full Regional Differences in and Influencing Factors of Animal Epidemic Risk in China
title_fullStr Regional Differences in and Influencing Factors of Animal Epidemic Risk in China
title_full_unstemmed Regional Differences in and Influencing Factors of Animal Epidemic Risk in China
title_sort regional differences in and influencing factors of animal epidemic risk in china
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Veterinary Science
issn 2297-1769
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Based on data from three major pig diseases, this study calculated the animal disease epidemic index of 31 provinces and autonomous regions in mainland China. We adopted the Gini coefficient to investigate the interregional differences in animal disease epidemic risk and used the Shapley value decomposition method to illustrate the contribution of influencing factors. The results showed that the Gini coefficient remains above 0.60, indicating significant interregional differences in mainland China. Animal breeding level, ecological environment, and animal disease prevention and control contribute most to the interregional differences in animal epidemic risk. The results imply that reducing sewage discharge, increasing pig production, and changing the breeding style from free-range to large-scale farming are measures that may help improve disease prevention and control. This study has implications for providing theoretical references for preventing and controlling animal epidemics and for improving public health governance.
topic animal epidemic risk
influencing factors
regional difference
Shapley value
epidemic risk index
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2020.00520/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yanlingli regionaldifferencesinandinfluencingfactorsofanimalepidemicriskinchina
AT longsun regionaldifferencesinandinfluencingfactorsofanimalepidemicriskinchina
AT weizhou regionaldifferencesinandinfluencingfactorsofanimalepidemicriskinchina
AT qingsongsu regionaldifferencesinandinfluencingfactorsofanimalepidemicriskinchina
_version_ 1724584405476835328