Speech adapts to differences in dentition within and across populations

Abstract We test the hypothesis that a specific anatomical feature, the dental malocclusion associated with reduced dental wear, causes languages to adapt by relying more heavily on labiodental consonants. In contrast to previous work on this topic, we adopt a usage-based approach that directly exam...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caleb Everett, Sihan Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80190-8
id doaj-24b962822d2b40bf924a20d4e2424bc8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-24b962822d2b40bf924a20d4e2424bc82021-01-17T12:31:43ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-01-0111111010.1038/s41598-020-80190-8Speech adapts to differences in dentition within and across populationsCaleb Everett0Sihan Chen1Department of Anthropology, University of MiamiDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MITAbstract We test the hypothesis that a specific anatomical feature, the dental malocclusion associated with reduced dental wear, causes languages to adapt by relying more heavily on labiodental consonants. In contrast to previous work on this topic, we adopt a usage-based approach that directly examines the relative frequency of such labiodental sounds within phonetically transcribed word lists and texts from thousands of languages. Labiodentals are shown to be very infrequent in the languages of hunter gatherers, who tend to have edge-to-edge bites as opposed to the overbite and overjet observed in populations that consume softer diets and rely heavily on eating utensils. This strong tendency is evident after controlling for Galton’s problem via multiple methods including frequentist and Bayesian linear mixed modeling. Additionally, we discuss data from Amazonian hunter gatherers with edge-to-edge bites. The languages of these populations are shown not to use labiodentals frequently, or to have only recently begun doing so. Finally, we analyze the speech of English speakers with varying bite types, demonstrating how the sounds used by individuals reflect the same phenomenon. The diverse findings converge on the same conclusion: speech adapts to anatomical differences within and across populations.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80190-8
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Caleb Everett
Sihan Chen
spellingShingle Caleb Everett
Sihan Chen
Speech adapts to differences in dentition within and across populations
Scientific Reports
author_facet Caleb Everett
Sihan Chen
author_sort Caleb Everett
title Speech adapts to differences in dentition within and across populations
title_short Speech adapts to differences in dentition within and across populations
title_full Speech adapts to differences in dentition within and across populations
title_fullStr Speech adapts to differences in dentition within and across populations
title_full_unstemmed Speech adapts to differences in dentition within and across populations
title_sort speech adapts to differences in dentition within and across populations
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract We test the hypothesis that a specific anatomical feature, the dental malocclusion associated with reduced dental wear, causes languages to adapt by relying more heavily on labiodental consonants. In contrast to previous work on this topic, we adopt a usage-based approach that directly examines the relative frequency of such labiodental sounds within phonetically transcribed word lists and texts from thousands of languages. Labiodentals are shown to be very infrequent in the languages of hunter gatherers, who tend to have edge-to-edge bites as opposed to the overbite and overjet observed in populations that consume softer diets and rely heavily on eating utensils. This strong tendency is evident after controlling for Galton’s problem via multiple methods including frequentist and Bayesian linear mixed modeling. Additionally, we discuss data from Amazonian hunter gatherers with edge-to-edge bites. The languages of these populations are shown not to use labiodentals frequently, or to have only recently begun doing so. Finally, we analyze the speech of English speakers with varying bite types, demonstrating how the sounds used by individuals reflect the same phenomenon. The diverse findings converge on the same conclusion: speech adapts to anatomical differences within and across populations.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80190-8
work_keys_str_mv AT calebeverett speechadaptstodifferencesindentitionwithinandacrosspopulations
AT sihanchen speechadaptstodifferencesindentitionwithinandacrosspopulations
_version_ 1714942051394519040