Sound Deposit Insurance Pricing Using a Machine Learning Approach

While the main conceptual issue related to deposit insurances is the moral hazard risk, the main technical issue is inaccurate calibration of the implied volatility. This issue can raise the risk of generating an arbitrage. In this paper, first, we discuss that by imposing the no-moral-hazard risk,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hirbod Assa, Mostafa Pouralizadeh, Abdolrahim Badamchizadeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-04-01
Series:Risks
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/7/2/45
id doaj-24bbb667d4f64cedbb1658408c606d4b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-24bbb667d4f64cedbb1658408c606d4b2020-11-24T21:24:31ZengMDPI AGRisks2227-90912019-04-01724510.3390/risks7020045risks7020045Sound Deposit Insurance Pricing Using a Machine Learning ApproachHirbod Assa0Mostafa Pouralizadeh1Abdolrahim Badamchizadeh2Mathematical Sciences Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZL, UKDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematical Science and Computer, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran 1489684511, IranDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematical Science and Computer, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran 1489684511, IranWhile the main conceptual issue related to deposit insurances is the moral hazard risk, the main technical issue is inaccurate calibration of the implied volatility. This issue can raise the risk of generating an arbitrage. In this paper, first, we discuss that by imposing the no-moral-hazard risk, the removal of arbitrage is equivalent to removing the static arbitrage. Then, we propose a simple quadratic model to parameterize implied volatility and remove the static arbitrage. The process of removing the static risk is as follows: Using a machine learning approach with a regularized cost function, we update the parameters in such a way that butterfly arbitrage is ruled out and also implementing a calibration method, we make some conditions on the parameters of each time slice to rule out calendar spread arbitrage. Therefore, eliminating the effects of both butterfly and calendar spread arbitrage make the implied volatility surface free of static arbitrage.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/7/2/45deposit insuranceimplied volatilitystatic arbitrageparameterizationmachine learningcalibration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hirbod Assa
Mostafa Pouralizadeh
Abdolrahim Badamchizadeh
spellingShingle Hirbod Assa
Mostafa Pouralizadeh
Abdolrahim Badamchizadeh
Sound Deposit Insurance Pricing Using a Machine Learning Approach
Risks
deposit insurance
implied volatility
static arbitrage
parameterization
machine learning
calibration
author_facet Hirbod Assa
Mostafa Pouralizadeh
Abdolrahim Badamchizadeh
author_sort Hirbod Assa
title Sound Deposit Insurance Pricing Using a Machine Learning Approach
title_short Sound Deposit Insurance Pricing Using a Machine Learning Approach
title_full Sound Deposit Insurance Pricing Using a Machine Learning Approach
title_fullStr Sound Deposit Insurance Pricing Using a Machine Learning Approach
title_full_unstemmed Sound Deposit Insurance Pricing Using a Machine Learning Approach
title_sort sound deposit insurance pricing using a machine learning approach
publisher MDPI AG
series Risks
issn 2227-9091
publishDate 2019-04-01
description While the main conceptual issue related to deposit insurances is the moral hazard risk, the main technical issue is inaccurate calibration of the implied volatility. This issue can raise the risk of generating an arbitrage. In this paper, first, we discuss that by imposing the no-moral-hazard risk, the removal of arbitrage is equivalent to removing the static arbitrage. Then, we propose a simple quadratic model to parameterize implied volatility and remove the static arbitrage. The process of removing the static risk is as follows: Using a machine learning approach with a regularized cost function, we update the parameters in such a way that butterfly arbitrage is ruled out and also implementing a calibration method, we make some conditions on the parameters of each time slice to rule out calendar spread arbitrage. Therefore, eliminating the effects of both butterfly and calendar spread arbitrage make the implied volatility surface free of static arbitrage.
topic deposit insurance
implied volatility
static arbitrage
parameterization
machine learning
calibration
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/7/2/45
work_keys_str_mv AT hirbodassa sounddepositinsurancepricingusingamachinelearningapproach
AT mostafapouralizadeh sounddepositinsurancepricingusingamachinelearningapproach
AT abdolrahimbadamchizadeh sounddepositinsurancepricingusingamachinelearningapproach
_version_ 1725987686674595840