| Summary: | enforcement, and its acts of interpretation of law sometimes draw attention even to
legislators. However, legal interpretative activities, unfortunately, are not without
problems that undermine its authority and practical significance. In such situations,
it is appropriate to talk about the need to optimize Legal interpretative activities,
which will maintain its quality at a high level. The purpose of the work is to analyze
the need for optimization of legal interpretative activities and propose a system of
criteria that indicate this.
Materials and methods. The implementation of research tasks was achieved
through the use of legal acts of judicial authorities, which set the vectors for the
implementation of legal interpretative activities and, at the same time, allow us to
identify difficulties that reduce the quality of law interpretation. In carrying out the
work were used the following methods of scientific knowledge: formal-legal analysis,
modeling. The use of the formal legal method allowed us to form the concept of
legal interpretative activities. The use of the analysis method allowed us to identify
the need to optimize legal interpretative activities. The use of the modeling method
allowed us to propose a system of criteria indicating the need for optimization in
specific areas of law-interpret activities.
Results. The author studies the concepts of legal interpretative activities based on
which the author’s vision is proposed; analyzes the legal acts of the judicial authorities
of the Russian Federation, which indicate the presence of contradictions in legal
interpretative activities; suggests the author’s system of criteria that justify the need
to optimize law-interpret activities.
Conclusions. The study of judicial legal acts of higher and lower courts testifies
to the periodically arising problems in legal interpretative activities that require not
episodic, but systematic solutions. For this purpose, it is necessary to develop and
implement specific criteria, the appearance of which will indicate the need to optimize
legal interpretative activities. This will ensure the effective, and most importantly
stable, functioning of the legal system of society, since timely overcoming of
problems should be preceded by their timely identification.
|
|---|
