Institutional Arrangement for Macroproprudential Policy – On Differences Across the EU Countries

There is a growing consensus among both economists‑academics and policymakers that there was at least one missing element of the financial safety net during the Global Financial Crisis. This element, which will probably improve financial stability (or protect against financial instability), is the m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anna Matysek-Jędrych
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lodz University Press 2018-10-01
Series:Comparative Economic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/CER/article/view/3672
id doaj-24fdf3336aa7476ea0e3554a6bffe4e8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-24fdf3336aa7476ea0e3554a6bffe4e82021-09-02T13:40:07ZengLodz University PressComparative Economic Research1508-20082082-67372018-10-01212374910.2478/cer-2018-00103672Institutional Arrangement for Macroproprudential Policy – On Differences Across the EU CountriesAnna Matysek-Jędrych0Assistant Professor at the Poznań University of Economics and Business, Department of the International Competitiveness, Poznan, PolandThere is a growing consensus among both economists‑academics and policymakers that there was at least one missing element of the financial safety net during the Global Financial Crisis. This element, which will probably improve financial stability (or protect against financial instability), is the macroprudential orientation in regulatory and supervisory frameworks. The main scope of the paper is the institutional dimensions of macroprudential policy. The principal purpose of the paper is to identify and assess, on a comparative, cross‑EU‑country basis, existing practices and developments in structuring a new dimension of the financial stability policy, i.e., a macroprudential one. The paper builds on existing theoretical considerations and the author’s own empirical survey of country practices in applying a macroprudential framework. A comparative, cross‑country analysis and a comparison of different sub‑indices and overall index values are the basis for verifying hypotheses and empirically disentangling the institutional differences between macroprudential policy regimes in European Union countries. The paper sheds light on recent trends in macroprudential policy governance and qualitative aspects (democratic accountability and transparency), with special attention to the position of a central bank across the European Union countries. The conducted research is a basis for constructing ratings of macroprudential authority accountability and transparency across the EU countries, which gives an indication of the overall quality of the institutional arrangements.https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/CER/article/view/3672central bankingfinancial stabilitymacroprudential policysystemic risk
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna Matysek-Jędrych
spellingShingle Anna Matysek-Jędrych
Institutional Arrangement for Macroproprudential Policy – On Differences Across the EU Countries
Comparative Economic Research
central banking
financial stability
macroprudential policy
systemic risk
author_facet Anna Matysek-Jędrych
author_sort Anna Matysek-Jędrych
title Institutional Arrangement for Macroproprudential Policy – On Differences Across the EU Countries
title_short Institutional Arrangement for Macroproprudential Policy – On Differences Across the EU Countries
title_full Institutional Arrangement for Macroproprudential Policy – On Differences Across the EU Countries
title_fullStr Institutional Arrangement for Macroproprudential Policy – On Differences Across the EU Countries
title_full_unstemmed Institutional Arrangement for Macroproprudential Policy – On Differences Across the EU Countries
title_sort institutional arrangement for macroproprudential policy – on differences across the eu countries
publisher Lodz University Press
series Comparative Economic Research
issn 1508-2008
2082-6737
publishDate 2018-10-01
description There is a growing consensus among both economists‑academics and policymakers that there was at least one missing element of the financial safety net during the Global Financial Crisis. This element, which will probably improve financial stability (or protect against financial instability), is the macroprudential orientation in regulatory and supervisory frameworks. The main scope of the paper is the institutional dimensions of macroprudential policy. The principal purpose of the paper is to identify and assess, on a comparative, cross‑EU‑country basis, existing practices and developments in structuring a new dimension of the financial stability policy, i.e., a macroprudential one. The paper builds on existing theoretical considerations and the author’s own empirical survey of country practices in applying a macroprudential framework. A comparative, cross‑country analysis and a comparison of different sub‑indices and overall index values are the basis for verifying hypotheses and empirically disentangling the institutional differences between macroprudential policy regimes in European Union countries. The paper sheds light on recent trends in macroprudential policy governance and qualitative aspects (democratic accountability and transparency), with special attention to the position of a central bank across the European Union countries. The conducted research is a basis for constructing ratings of macroprudential authority accountability and transparency across the EU countries, which gives an indication of the overall quality of the institutional arrangements.
topic central banking
financial stability
macroprudential policy
systemic risk
url https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/CER/article/view/3672
work_keys_str_mv AT annamatysekjedrych institutionalarrangementformacroproprudentialpolicyondifferencesacrosstheeucountries
_version_ 1721174762936336384