The Relevance of Foreshocks in Earthquake Triggering: A Statistical Study

An increase of seismic activity is often observed before large earthquakes. Events responsible for this increase are usually named foreshock and their occurrence probably represents the most reliable precursory pattern. Many foreshocks statistical features can be interpreted in terms of the standard...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eugenio Lippiello, Cataldo Godano, Lucilla de Arcangelis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-02-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/2/173
id doaj-24ffe4b3464f43d18ee8ee997d4bcd07
record_format Article
spelling doaj-24ffe4b3464f43d18ee8ee997d4bcd072020-11-25T00:30:41ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002019-02-0121217310.3390/e21020173e21020173The Relevance of Foreshocks in Earthquake Triggering: A Statistical StudyEugenio Lippiello0Cataldo Godano1Lucilla de Arcangelis2Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Viale Lincoln 5, 81100 Caserta, ItalyDepartment of Mathematics and Physics, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Viale Lincoln 5, 81100 Caserta, ItalyDepartment of Engineering, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli’, Via Roma 29, 81031 Aversa (CE), ItalyAn increase of seismic activity is often observed before large earthquakes. Events responsible for this increase are usually named foreshock and their occurrence probably represents the most reliable precursory pattern. Many foreshocks statistical features can be interpreted in terms of the standard mainshock-to-aftershock triggering process and are recovered in the Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence ETAS model. Here we present a statistical study of instrumental seismic catalogs from four different geographic regions. We focus on some common features of foreshocks in the four catalogs which cannot be reproduced by the ETAS model. In particular we find in instrumental catalogs a significantly larger number of foreshocks than the one predicted by the ETAS model. We show that this foreshock excess cannot be attributed to catalog incompleteness. We therefore propose a generalized formulation of the ETAS model, the ETAFS model, which explicitly includes foreshock occurrence. Statistical features of aftershocks and foreshocks in the ETAFS model are in very good agreement with instrumental results.https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/2/173forecastingforeshocksETAS model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eugenio Lippiello
Cataldo Godano
Lucilla de Arcangelis
spellingShingle Eugenio Lippiello
Cataldo Godano
Lucilla de Arcangelis
The Relevance of Foreshocks in Earthquake Triggering: A Statistical Study
Entropy
forecasting
foreshocks
ETAS model
author_facet Eugenio Lippiello
Cataldo Godano
Lucilla de Arcangelis
author_sort Eugenio Lippiello
title The Relevance of Foreshocks in Earthquake Triggering: A Statistical Study
title_short The Relevance of Foreshocks in Earthquake Triggering: A Statistical Study
title_full The Relevance of Foreshocks in Earthquake Triggering: A Statistical Study
title_fullStr The Relevance of Foreshocks in Earthquake Triggering: A Statistical Study
title_full_unstemmed The Relevance of Foreshocks in Earthquake Triggering: A Statistical Study
title_sort relevance of foreshocks in earthquake triggering: a statistical study
publisher MDPI AG
series Entropy
issn 1099-4300
publishDate 2019-02-01
description An increase of seismic activity is often observed before large earthquakes. Events responsible for this increase are usually named foreshock and their occurrence probably represents the most reliable precursory pattern. Many foreshocks statistical features can be interpreted in terms of the standard mainshock-to-aftershock triggering process and are recovered in the Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence ETAS model. Here we present a statistical study of instrumental seismic catalogs from four different geographic regions. We focus on some common features of foreshocks in the four catalogs which cannot be reproduced by the ETAS model. In particular we find in instrumental catalogs a significantly larger number of foreshocks than the one predicted by the ETAS model. We show that this foreshock excess cannot be attributed to catalog incompleteness. We therefore propose a generalized formulation of the ETAS model, the ETAFS model, which explicitly includes foreshock occurrence. Statistical features of aftershocks and foreshocks in the ETAFS model are in very good agreement with instrumental results.
topic forecasting
foreshocks
ETAS model
url https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/2/173
work_keys_str_mv AT eugeniolippiello therelevanceofforeshocksinearthquaketriggeringastatisticalstudy
AT cataldogodano therelevanceofforeshocksinearthquaketriggeringastatisticalstudy
AT lucilladearcangelis therelevanceofforeshocksinearthquaketriggeringastatisticalstudy
AT eugeniolippiello relevanceofforeshocksinearthquaketriggeringastatisticalstudy
AT cataldogodano relevanceofforeshocksinearthquaketriggeringastatisticalstudy
AT lucilladearcangelis relevanceofforeshocksinearthquaketriggeringastatisticalstudy
_version_ 1725325459680395264