Perceptual advantage for category-relevant perceptual dimensions: The case of shape and motion

Category learning facilitates perception along relevant stimulus dimensions, even when tested in a discrimination task that does not require categorization. While this general phenomenon has been demonstrated previously, perceptual facilitation along dimensions has been documented by measuring diffe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan R Folstein, Thomas J. Palmeri, Isabel eGauthier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01394/full
id doaj-252ef3780af444fb973ba78873586256
record_format Article
spelling doaj-252ef3780af444fb973ba788735862562020-11-24T22:38:47ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-12-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.01394112326Perceptual advantage for category-relevant perceptual dimensions: The case of shape and motionJonathan R Folstein0Thomas J. Palmeri1Isabel eGauthier2Florida State UniversityVanderbilt UniversityVanderbilt UniversityCategory learning facilitates perception along relevant stimulus dimensions, even when tested in a discrimination task that does not require categorization. While this general phenomenon has been demonstrated previously, perceptual facilitation along dimensions has been documented by measuring different specific phenomena in different studies using different kinds of objects. Across several object domains, there is support for acquired distinctiveness, the stretching of a perceptual dimension relevant to learned categories. Studies using faces and studies using simple separable visual dimensions have also found evidence of acquired equivalence, the shrinking of a perceptual dimension irrelevant to learned categories, and categorical perception, the local stretching across the category boundary. These later two effects are rarely observed with complex non-face objects. Failures to find these effects with complex non-face objects may have been because the dimensions tested previously were perceptually integrated. Here we tested effects of category learning with non-face objects categorized along dimensions that have been found to be processed by different areas of the brain, shape and motion. While we replicated acquired distinctiveness, we found no evidence for acquired equivalence or categorical perception.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01394/fullPsychophysicsPerceptual Learningobject recognitioncategory learningdimensional modulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jonathan R Folstein
Thomas J. Palmeri
Isabel eGauthier
spellingShingle Jonathan R Folstein
Thomas J. Palmeri
Isabel eGauthier
Perceptual advantage for category-relevant perceptual dimensions: The case of shape and motion
Frontiers in Psychology
Psychophysics
Perceptual Learning
object recognition
category learning
dimensional modulation
author_facet Jonathan R Folstein
Thomas J. Palmeri
Isabel eGauthier
author_sort Jonathan R Folstein
title Perceptual advantage for category-relevant perceptual dimensions: The case of shape and motion
title_short Perceptual advantage for category-relevant perceptual dimensions: The case of shape and motion
title_full Perceptual advantage for category-relevant perceptual dimensions: The case of shape and motion
title_fullStr Perceptual advantage for category-relevant perceptual dimensions: The case of shape and motion
title_full_unstemmed Perceptual advantage for category-relevant perceptual dimensions: The case of shape and motion
title_sort perceptual advantage for category-relevant perceptual dimensions: the case of shape and motion
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2014-12-01
description Category learning facilitates perception along relevant stimulus dimensions, even when tested in a discrimination task that does not require categorization. While this general phenomenon has been demonstrated previously, perceptual facilitation along dimensions has been documented by measuring different specific phenomena in different studies using different kinds of objects. Across several object domains, there is support for acquired distinctiveness, the stretching of a perceptual dimension relevant to learned categories. Studies using faces and studies using simple separable visual dimensions have also found evidence of acquired equivalence, the shrinking of a perceptual dimension irrelevant to learned categories, and categorical perception, the local stretching across the category boundary. These later two effects are rarely observed with complex non-face objects. Failures to find these effects with complex non-face objects may have been because the dimensions tested previously were perceptually integrated. Here we tested effects of category learning with non-face objects categorized along dimensions that have been found to be processed by different areas of the brain, shape and motion. While we replicated acquired distinctiveness, we found no evidence for acquired equivalence or categorical perception.
topic Psychophysics
Perceptual Learning
object recognition
category learning
dimensional modulation
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01394/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanrfolstein perceptualadvantageforcategoryrelevantperceptualdimensionsthecaseofshapeandmotion
AT thomasjpalmeri perceptualadvantageforcategoryrelevantperceptualdimensionsthecaseofshapeandmotion
AT isabelegauthier perceptualadvantageforcategoryrelevantperceptualdimensionsthecaseofshapeandmotion
_version_ 1725711926032334848