Method matters: Experimental evidence for shorter avian sperm in faecal compared to abdominal massage samples.

Birds are model organisms in sperm biology. Previous work in zebra finches, suggested that sperm sampled from males' faeces and ejaculates do not differ in size. Here, we tested this assumption in a captive population of house sparrows, Passer domesticus. We compared sperm length in samples fro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antje Girndt, Glenn Cockburn, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Hanne Løvlie, Julia Schroeder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5559096?pdf=render
id doaj-2536495f279547ccb48e8e8e946e6812
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2536495f279547ccb48e8e8e946e68122020-11-25T02:10:30ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01128e018285310.1371/journal.pone.0182853Method matters: Experimental evidence for shorter avian sperm in faecal compared to abdominal massage samples.Antje GirndtGlenn CockburnAlfredo Sánchez-TójarHanne LøvlieJulia SchroederBirds are model organisms in sperm biology. Previous work in zebra finches, suggested that sperm sampled from males' faeces and ejaculates do not differ in size. Here, we tested this assumption in a captive population of house sparrows, Passer domesticus. We compared sperm length in samples from three collection techniques: female dummy, faecal and abdominal massage samples. We found that sperm were significantly shorter in faecal than abdominal massage samples, which was explained by shorter heads and midpieces, but not flagella. This result might indicate that faecal sampled sperm could be less mature than sperm collected by abdominal massage. The female dummy method resulted in an insufficient number of experimental ejaculates because most males ignored it. In light of these results, we recommend using abdominal massage as a preferred method for avian sperm sampling. Where avian sperm cannot be collected by abdominal massage alone, we advise controlling for sperm sampling protocol statistically.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5559096?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antje Girndt
Glenn Cockburn
Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar
Hanne Løvlie
Julia Schroeder
spellingShingle Antje Girndt
Glenn Cockburn
Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar
Hanne Løvlie
Julia Schroeder
Method matters: Experimental evidence for shorter avian sperm in faecal compared to abdominal massage samples.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Antje Girndt
Glenn Cockburn
Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar
Hanne Løvlie
Julia Schroeder
author_sort Antje Girndt
title Method matters: Experimental evidence for shorter avian sperm in faecal compared to abdominal massage samples.
title_short Method matters: Experimental evidence for shorter avian sperm in faecal compared to abdominal massage samples.
title_full Method matters: Experimental evidence for shorter avian sperm in faecal compared to abdominal massage samples.
title_fullStr Method matters: Experimental evidence for shorter avian sperm in faecal compared to abdominal massage samples.
title_full_unstemmed Method matters: Experimental evidence for shorter avian sperm in faecal compared to abdominal massage samples.
title_sort method matters: experimental evidence for shorter avian sperm in faecal compared to abdominal massage samples.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Birds are model organisms in sperm biology. Previous work in zebra finches, suggested that sperm sampled from males' faeces and ejaculates do not differ in size. Here, we tested this assumption in a captive population of house sparrows, Passer domesticus. We compared sperm length in samples from three collection techniques: female dummy, faecal and abdominal massage samples. We found that sperm were significantly shorter in faecal than abdominal massage samples, which was explained by shorter heads and midpieces, but not flagella. This result might indicate that faecal sampled sperm could be less mature than sperm collected by abdominal massage. The female dummy method resulted in an insufficient number of experimental ejaculates because most males ignored it. In light of these results, we recommend using abdominal massage as a preferred method for avian sperm sampling. Where avian sperm cannot be collected by abdominal massage alone, we advise controlling for sperm sampling protocol statistically.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5559096?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT antjegirndt methodmattersexperimentalevidenceforshorteraviansperminfaecalcomparedtoabdominalmassagesamples
AT glenncockburn methodmattersexperimentalevidenceforshorteraviansperminfaecalcomparedtoabdominalmassagesamples
AT alfredosancheztojar methodmattersexperimentalevidenceforshorteraviansperminfaecalcomparedtoabdominalmassagesamples
AT hanneløvlie methodmattersexperimentalevidenceforshorteraviansperminfaecalcomparedtoabdominalmassagesamples
AT juliaschroeder methodmattersexperimentalevidenceforshorteraviansperminfaecalcomparedtoabdominalmassagesamples
_version_ 1724919364175527936