How accurate can genetic predictions be?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Pre-symptomatic prediction of disease and drug response based on genetic testing is a critical component of personalized medicine. Previous work has demonstrated that the predictive capacity of genetic testing is constrained by the h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dreyfuss Jonathan M, Levner Daniel, Galagan James E, Church George M, Ramoni Marco F
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-07-01
Series:BMC Genomics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/13/340
id doaj-254e16aebba8436eb2b40d38b27b75e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-254e16aebba8436eb2b40d38b27b75e12020-11-24T23:02:49ZengBMCBMC Genomics1471-21642012-07-0113134010.1186/1471-2164-13-340How accurate can genetic predictions be?Dreyfuss Jonathan MLevner DanielGalagan James EChurch George MRamoni Marco F<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Pre-symptomatic prediction of disease and drug response based on genetic testing is a critical component of personalized medicine. Previous work has demonstrated that the predictive capacity of genetic testing is constrained by the heritability and prevalence of the tested trait, although these constraints have only been approximated under the assumption of a normally distributed genetic risk distribution.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Here, we mathematically derive the absolute limits that these factors impose on test accuracy in the absence of any distributional assumptions on risk. We present these limits in terms of the best-case receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, consisting of the best-case test sensitivities and specificities, and the AUC (area under the curve) measure of accuracy. We apply our method to genetic prediction of type 2 diabetes and breast cancer, and we additionally show the best possible accuracy that can be obtained from integrated predictors, which can incorporate non-genetic features.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Knowledge of such limits is valuable in understanding the implications of genetic testing even before additional associations are identified.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/13/340
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dreyfuss Jonathan M
Levner Daniel
Galagan James E
Church George M
Ramoni Marco F
spellingShingle Dreyfuss Jonathan M
Levner Daniel
Galagan James E
Church George M
Ramoni Marco F
How accurate can genetic predictions be?
BMC Genomics
author_facet Dreyfuss Jonathan M
Levner Daniel
Galagan James E
Church George M
Ramoni Marco F
author_sort Dreyfuss Jonathan M
title How accurate can genetic predictions be?
title_short How accurate can genetic predictions be?
title_full How accurate can genetic predictions be?
title_fullStr How accurate can genetic predictions be?
title_full_unstemmed How accurate can genetic predictions be?
title_sort how accurate can genetic predictions be?
publisher BMC
series BMC Genomics
issn 1471-2164
publishDate 2012-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Pre-symptomatic prediction of disease and drug response based on genetic testing is a critical component of personalized medicine. Previous work has demonstrated that the predictive capacity of genetic testing is constrained by the heritability and prevalence of the tested trait, although these constraints have only been approximated under the assumption of a normally distributed genetic risk distribution.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Here, we mathematically derive the absolute limits that these factors impose on test accuracy in the absence of any distributional assumptions on risk. We present these limits in terms of the best-case receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, consisting of the best-case test sensitivities and specificities, and the AUC (area under the curve) measure of accuracy. We apply our method to genetic prediction of type 2 diabetes and breast cancer, and we additionally show the best possible accuracy that can be obtained from integrated predictors, which can incorporate non-genetic features.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Knowledge of such limits is valuable in understanding the implications of genetic testing even before additional associations are identified.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/13/340
work_keys_str_mv AT dreyfussjonathanm howaccuratecangeneticpredictionsbe
AT levnerdaniel howaccuratecangeneticpredictionsbe
AT galaganjamese howaccuratecangeneticpredictionsbe
AT churchgeorgem howaccuratecangeneticpredictionsbe
AT ramonimarcof howaccuratecangeneticpredictionsbe
_version_ 1725635049139732480