Caminos de frontera: espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte amazónico colombiano

This article analyzes of ethnographic, geographical and cartographic discourses around transportation infrastructure plans and projects in the Andean-Amazonian foothills of southern Colombia. Specifically, it shows how the colonial and postcolonial vision of the foothills as a physical and symbolic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Simón Uribe
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad de los Andes 2019-04-01
Series:Historia Crítica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/histcrit72.2019.04
id doaj-2572f86e704e404ca12e75bc667bccbf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2572f86e704e404ca12e75bc667bccbf2020-11-24T20:48:52ZspaUniversidad de los Andes Historia Crítica0121-16171900-61522019-04-0172699210.7440/histcrit72.2019.04Caminos de frontera: espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte amazónico colombianoSimón Uribe0Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, ColombiaThis article analyzes of ethnographic, geographical and cartographic discourses around transportation infrastructure plans and projects in the Andean-Amazonian foothills of southern Colombia. Specifically, it shows how the colonial and postcolonial vision of the foothills as a physical and symbolic frontier between a “civilized” and a “savage” world has been instrumental in the conception and execution of such plans and projects, and, more broadly, in the control and appropriation of the Amazonian region. Originality: Usually, historical works on the Colombian nation-building have adopted a monolithic and centric vision of infrastructure because development has historically been confined to a limited portion of the national territory. On the contrary, this article focuses on the role of regions considered “frontiers”, “peripheries” or “margins” in the construction and legitimation of a hegemonic state project. Methodology: The research is based on the analysis and contrasting of primary sources such as travelers’ accounts, cartographic representations, and missionary and government archives. Conclusions: By establishing historical continuity in the discourses and infrastructure practices of the Andean-Amazonian foothills, we can conclude that these are part of a long-standing tradition in which the foothills is seen as a frontier, and roads and highways are viewed as “civilizing” infrastructure of the Amazonian space.https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/histcrit72.2019.04Amazonian regionColombiadevelopmentfrontiersinfrastructurestate-building
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Simón Uribe
spellingShingle Simón Uribe
Caminos de frontera: espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte amazónico colombiano
Historia Crítica
Amazonian region
Colombia
development
frontiers
infrastructure
state-building
author_facet Simón Uribe
author_sort Simón Uribe
title Caminos de frontera: espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte amazónico colombiano
title_short Caminos de frontera: espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte amazónico colombiano
title_full Caminos de frontera: espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte amazónico colombiano
title_fullStr Caminos de frontera: espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte amazónico colombiano
title_full_unstemmed Caminos de frontera: espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte amazónico colombiano
title_sort caminos de frontera: espacio y poder en la historia del piedemonte amazónico colombiano
publisher Universidad de los Andes
series Historia Crítica
issn 0121-1617
1900-6152
publishDate 2019-04-01
description This article analyzes of ethnographic, geographical and cartographic discourses around transportation infrastructure plans and projects in the Andean-Amazonian foothills of southern Colombia. Specifically, it shows how the colonial and postcolonial vision of the foothills as a physical and symbolic frontier between a “civilized” and a “savage” world has been instrumental in the conception and execution of such plans and projects, and, more broadly, in the control and appropriation of the Amazonian region. Originality: Usually, historical works on the Colombian nation-building have adopted a monolithic and centric vision of infrastructure because development has historically been confined to a limited portion of the national territory. On the contrary, this article focuses on the role of regions considered “frontiers”, “peripheries” or “margins” in the construction and legitimation of a hegemonic state project. Methodology: The research is based on the analysis and contrasting of primary sources such as travelers’ accounts, cartographic representations, and missionary and government archives. Conclusions: By establishing historical continuity in the discourses and infrastructure practices of the Andean-Amazonian foothills, we can conclude that these are part of a long-standing tradition in which the foothills is seen as a frontier, and roads and highways are viewed as “civilizing” infrastructure of the Amazonian space.
topic Amazonian region
Colombia
development
frontiers
infrastructure
state-building
url https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/histcrit72.2019.04
work_keys_str_mv AT simonuribe caminosdefronteraespacioypoderenlahistoriadelpiedemonteamazonicocolombiano
_version_ 1716807681150287872