Corneal biomechanics in connective tissue disorders

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the corneal biomechanical properties in patients with connective tissue disorders (CTDs) and compare them with age-matched healthy control. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 62 patients (study group) with CTDs and 44 healthy pati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Divya Kesarwani, Vaibhav Kumar Jain, Rachna Agarwal, Jaya Kaushik, Kumudini Sharma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcor.in/article.asp?issn=2320-3897;year=2021;volume=9;issue=2;spage=64;epage=66;aulast=Kesarwani
id doaj-257675e40a4848a79c953a9bfdfee167
record_format Article
spelling doaj-257675e40a4848a79c953a9bfdfee1672021-08-09T09:55:20ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research2320-38972021-01-0192646610.4103/jcor.jcor_74_20Corneal biomechanics in connective tissue disordersDivya KesarwaniVaibhav Kumar JainRachna AgarwalJaya KaushikKumudini SharmaPurpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the corneal biomechanical properties in patients with connective tissue disorders (CTDs) and compare them with age-matched healthy control. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 62 patients (study group) with CTDs and 44 healthy patients (control) were analyzed by Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert Inc., Depew, N. Y., USA) and Corneal Pachymetry (SP-2000, Tomey, Nagoya, Japan). The right eye of all patients was assessed for corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPc), and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and central corneal thickness (CCT). Results: Mean CH (9.54 ± 1.66 mm Hg [study group] and 10.62 ± 1.21 mm Hg [control]; P = 0.013) and mean CRF (9.95 ± 1.47 mm Hg [study group] and 10.76 ± 1.25 mm Hg [control]; P = 0.040) were significantly different between groups. Mean IOPc, IOPg, and CCT were not significantly different between groups. In the subgroup analysis of study cases (oral steroid versus nonsteroid therapy) of CTDs, CRF which was significantly lower in steroid (9.25 mm Hg) compared nonsteroid therapy (10.20 mm Hg) (P = 0.045), whereas, other parameters such as CCT, CH, IOPc, and IOPg were comparable between the two groups (P ≥ 0.05). Conclusion: CH is altered in CTDs which may be an independent risk factor for glaucoma and might underestimate intraocular pressure so CH is an important consideration in patients with CTDs.shttp://www.jcor.in/article.asp?issn=2320-3897;year=2021;volume=9;issue=2;spage=64;epage=66;aulast=Kesarwaniconnective tissue disorderscorneal biomechanicscorneal hysteresisintraocular pressurerheumatoid
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Divya Kesarwani
Vaibhav Kumar Jain
Rachna Agarwal
Jaya Kaushik
Kumudini Sharma
spellingShingle Divya Kesarwani
Vaibhav Kumar Jain
Rachna Agarwal
Jaya Kaushik
Kumudini Sharma
Corneal biomechanics in connective tissue disorders
Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research
connective tissue disorders
corneal biomechanics
corneal hysteresis
intraocular pressure
rheumatoid
author_facet Divya Kesarwani
Vaibhav Kumar Jain
Rachna Agarwal
Jaya Kaushik
Kumudini Sharma
author_sort Divya Kesarwani
title Corneal biomechanics in connective tissue disorders
title_short Corneal biomechanics in connective tissue disorders
title_full Corneal biomechanics in connective tissue disorders
title_fullStr Corneal biomechanics in connective tissue disorders
title_full_unstemmed Corneal biomechanics in connective tissue disorders
title_sort corneal biomechanics in connective tissue disorders
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research
issn 2320-3897
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the corneal biomechanical properties in patients with connective tissue disorders (CTDs) and compare them with age-matched healthy control. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 62 patients (study group) with CTDs and 44 healthy patients (control) were analyzed by Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert Inc., Depew, N. Y., USA) and Corneal Pachymetry (SP-2000, Tomey, Nagoya, Japan). The right eye of all patients was assessed for corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPc), and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and central corneal thickness (CCT). Results: Mean CH (9.54 ± 1.66 mm Hg [study group] and 10.62 ± 1.21 mm Hg [control]; P = 0.013) and mean CRF (9.95 ± 1.47 mm Hg [study group] and 10.76 ± 1.25 mm Hg [control]; P = 0.040) were significantly different between groups. Mean IOPc, IOPg, and CCT were not significantly different between groups. In the subgroup analysis of study cases (oral steroid versus nonsteroid therapy) of CTDs, CRF which was significantly lower in steroid (9.25 mm Hg) compared nonsteroid therapy (10.20 mm Hg) (P = 0.045), whereas, other parameters such as CCT, CH, IOPc, and IOPg were comparable between the two groups (P ≥ 0.05). Conclusion: CH is altered in CTDs which may be an independent risk factor for glaucoma and might underestimate intraocular pressure so CH is an important consideration in patients with CTDs.s
topic connective tissue disorders
corneal biomechanics
corneal hysteresis
intraocular pressure
rheumatoid
url http://www.jcor.in/article.asp?issn=2320-3897;year=2021;volume=9;issue=2;spage=64;epage=66;aulast=Kesarwani
work_keys_str_mv AT divyakesarwani cornealbiomechanicsinconnectivetissuedisorders
AT vaibhavkumarjain cornealbiomechanicsinconnectivetissuedisorders
AT rachnaagarwal cornealbiomechanicsinconnectivetissuedisorders
AT jayakaushik cornealbiomechanicsinconnectivetissuedisorders
AT kumudinisharma cornealbiomechanicsinconnectivetissuedisorders
_version_ 1721214469548277760