Comparison of thick-target (alpha,n) yield calculation codes

Neutron production yields and energy distributions from (α,n) reactions in light elements were calculated using three different codes (SOURCES, NEDIS and USD) and compared with the existing experimental data in the 3.5-10 MeV alpha energy range. SOURCES and NEDIS display an agreement between calcula...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernandes Ana C., Kling Andreas, Vlaskin Gennadiy N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:EPJ Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201715307021
id doaj-2582b0e86cf04c8b80e5b3e9062bf54b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2582b0e86cf04c8b80e5b3e9062bf54b2021-08-02T05:47:10ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Web of Conferences2100-014X2017-01-011530702110.1051/epjconf/201715307021epjconf_icrs2017_07021Comparison of thick-target (alpha,n) yield calculation codesFernandes Ana C.0Kling Andreas1Vlaskin Gennadiy N.2Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de LisboaCentro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de LisboaInnovation Technology Centre for the PRORYV Project, ROSATOMNeutron production yields and energy distributions from (α,n) reactions in light elements were calculated using three different codes (SOURCES, NEDIS and USD) and compared with the existing experimental data in the 3.5-10 MeV alpha energy range. SOURCES and NEDIS display an agreement between calculated and measured yields in the decay series of 235U, 238U and 232Th within ±10% for most materials. The discrepancy increases with alpha energy but still an agreement of ±20% applies to all materials with reliable elemental production yields (the few exceptions are identified). The calculated neutron energy distributions describe the experimental data, with NEDIS retrieving very well the detailed features. USD generally underestimates the measured yields, in particular for compounds with heavy elements and/or at high alpha energies. The energy distributions exhibit sharp peaks that do not match the observations. These findings may be caused by a poor accounting of the alpha particle energy loss by the code. A big variability was found among the calculated neutron production yields for alphas from Sm decay; the lack of yield measurements for low (~2 MeV) alphas does not allow to conclude on the codes’ accuracy in this energy region.https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201715307021
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fernandes Ana C.
Kling Andreas
Vlaskin Gennadiy N.
spellingShingle Fernandes Ana C.
Kling Andreas
Vlaskin Gennadiy N.
Comparison of thick-target (alpha,n) yield calculation codes
EPJ Web of Conferences
author_facet Fernandes Ana C.
Kling Andreas
Vlaskin Gennadiy N.
author_sort Fernandes Ana C.
title Comparison of thick-target (alpha,n) yield calculation codes
title_short Comparison of thick-target (alpha,n) yield calculation codes
title_full Comparison of thick-target (alpha,n) yield calculation codes
title_fullStr Comparison of thick-target (alpha,n) yield calculation codes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of thick-target (alpha,n) yield calculation codes
title_sort comparison of thick-target (alpha,n) yield calculation codes
publisher EDP Sciences
series EPJ Web of Conferences
issn 2100-014X
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Neutron production yields and energy distributions from (α,n) reactions in light elements were calculated using three different codes (SOURCES, NEDIS and USD) and compared with the existing experimental data in the 3.5-10 MeV alpha energy range. SOURCES and NEDIS display an agreement between calculated and measured yields in the decay series of 235U, 238U and 232Th within ±10% for most materials. The discrepancy increases with alpha energy but still an agreement of ±20% applies to all materials with reliable elemental production yields (the few exceptions are identified). The calculated neutron energy distributions describe the experimental data, with NEDIS retrieving very well the detailed features. USD generally underestimates the measured yields, in particular for compounds with heavy elements and/or at high alpha energies. The energy distributions exhibit sharp peaks that do not match the observations. These findings may be caused by a poor accounting of the alpha particle energy loss by the code. A big variability was found among the calculated neutron production yields for alphas from Sm decay; the lack of yield measurements for low (~2 MeV) alphas does not allow to conclude on the codes’ accuracy in this energy region.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201715307021
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandesanac comparisonofthicktargetalphanyieldcalculationcodes
AT klingandreas comparisonofthicktargetalphanyieldcalculationcodes
AT vlaskingennadiyn comparisonofthicktargetalphanyieldcalculationcodes
_version_ 1721240918842933248