Observational learning :Tell beginners what they are about to watch and they will learn better

Observation aids motor skill learning. When multiple models or different levels of performance are observed, does learning improve when the observer is informed of the performance quality prior to each observation trial or after each trial? We used a knockdown barrier task and asked participants to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mathieu eAndrieux, Luc eProteau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00051/full
id doaj-2588b545b0fb4cd3af847a7cb27e1c31
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2588b545b0fb4cd3af847a7cb27e1c312020-11-25T01:01:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782016-01-01710.3389/fpsyg.2016.00051159924Observational learning :Tell beginners what they are about to watch and they will learn betterMathieu eAndrieux0Luc eProteau1Université de MontréalUniversité de MontréalObservation aids motor skill learning. When multiple models or different levels of performance are observed, does learning improve when the observer is informed of the performance quality prior to each observation trial or after each trial? We used a knockdown barrier task and asked participants to learn a new relative timing pattern that differed from that naturally emerging from the task constraints (Blandin, Lhuisset, & Proteau, 1999). Following a physical execution pre-test, the participants observed two models demonstrating different levels of performance and were either informed of this performance prior to or after each observation trial. The results of the physical execution retention tests of the two experiments reported in the present study indicated that informing the observers of the demonstration quality they were about to see aided learning more than when this information was provided after each observation trial. Our results suggest that providing advanced information concerning the quality of the observation may help participants detect errors in the model’s performance, which is something that novice participants have difficulty doing, and then learn from these observations.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00051/fullFeedbackmotor learningfeedforwardKnowledge of resultsaction observation networkRelative timing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mathieu eAndrieux
Luc eProteau
spellingShingle Mathieu eAndrieux
Luc eProteau
Observational learning :Tell beginners what they are about to watch and they will learn better
Frontiers in Psychology
Feedback
motor learning
feedforward
Knowledge of results
action observation network
Relative timing
author_facet Mathieu eAndrieux
Luc eProteau
author_sort Mathieu eAndrieux
title Observational learning :Tell beginners what they are about to watch and they will learn better
title_short Observational learning :Tell beginners what they are about to watch and they will learn better
title_full Observational learning :Tell beginners what they are about to watch and they will learn better
title_fullStr Observational learning :Tell beginners what they are about to watch and they will learn better
title_full_unstemmed Observational learning :Tell beginners what they are about to watch and they will learn better
title_sort observational learning :tell beginners what they are about to watch and they will learn better
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Observation aids motor skill learning. When multiple models or different levels of performance are observed, does learning improve when the observer is informed of the performance quality prior to each observation trial or after each trial? We used a knockdown barrier task and asked participants to learn a new relative timing pattern that differed from that naturally emerging from the task constraints (Blandin, Lhuisset, & Proteau, 1999). Following a physical execution pre-test, the participants observed two models demonstrating different levels of performance and were either informed of this performance prior to or after each observation trial. The results of the physical execution retention tests of the two experiments reported in the present study indicated that informing the observers of the demonstration quality they were about to see aided learning more than when this information was provided after each observation trial. Our results suggest that providing advanced information concerning the quality of the observation may help participants detect errors in the model’s performance, which is something that novice participants have difficulty doing, and then learn from these observations.
topic Feedback
motor learning
feedforward
Knowledge of results
action observation network
Relative timing
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00051/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mathieueandrieux observationallearningtellbeginnerswhattheyareabouttowatchandtheywilllearnbetter
AT luceproteau observationallearningtellbeginnerswhattheyareabouttowatchandtheywilllearnbetter
_version_ 1725209694843174912