Individual Differences in Temporal Selective Attention as Reflected in Pupil Dilation.

Attention is restricted for the second of two targets when it is presented within 200-500 ms of the first target. This attentional blink (AB) phenomenon allows one to study the dynamics of temporal selective attention by varying the interval between the two targets (T1 and T2). Whereas the AB has lo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charlotte Willems, Johannes Herdzin, Sander Martens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4682773?pdf=render
id doaj-2598b3e5f1eb4c61a90ba629781774f8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2598b3e5f1eb4c61a90ba629781774f82020-11-25T01:50:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011012e014505610.1371/journal.pone.0145056Individual Differences in Temporal Selective Attention as Reflected in Pupil Dilation.Charlotte WillemsJohannes HerdzinSander MartensAttention is restricted for the second of two targets when it is presented within 200-500 ms of the first target. This attentional blink (AB) phenomenon allows one to study the dynamics of temporal selective attention by varying the interval between the two targets (T1 and T2). Whereas the AB has long been considered as a robust and universal cognitive limitation, several studies have demonstrated that AB task performance greatly differs between individuals, with some individuals showing no AB whatsoever.Here, we studied these individual differences in AB task performance in relation to differences in attentional timing. Furthermore, we investigated whether AB magnitude is predictive for the amount of attention allocated to T1. For both these purposes pupil dilation was measured, and analyzed with our recently developed deconvolution method. We found that the dynamics of temporal attention in small versus large blinkers differ in a number of ways. Individuals with a relatively small AB magnitude seem better able to preserve temporal order information. In addition, they are quicker to allocate attention to both T1 and T2 than large blinkers. Although a popular explanation of the AB is that it is caused by an unnecessary overinvestment of attention allocated to T1, a more complex picture emerged from our data, suggesting that this may depend on whether one is a small or a large blinker.The use of pupil dilation deconvolution seems to be a powerful approach to study the temporal dynamics of attention, bringing us a step closer to understanding the elusive nature of the AB. We conclude that the timing of attention to targets may be more important than the amount of allocated attention in accounting for individual differences.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4682773?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Charlotte Willems
Johannes Herdzin
Sander Martens
spellingShingle Charlotte Willems
Johannes Herdzin
Sander Martens
Individual Differences in Temporal Selective Attention as Reflected in Pupil Dilation.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Charlotte Willems
Johannes Herdzin
Sander Martens
author_sort Charlotte Willems
title Individual Differences in Temporal Selective Attention as Reflected in Pupil Dilation.
title_short Individual Differences in Temporal Selective Attention as Reflected in Pupil Dilation.
title_full Individual Differences in Temporal Selective Attention as Reflected in Pupil Dilation.
title_fullStr Individual Differences in Temporal Selective Attention as Reflected in Pupil Dilation.
title_full_unstemmed Individual Differences in Temporal Selective Attention as Reflected in Pupil Dilation.
title_sort individual differences in temporal selective attention as reflected in pupil dilation.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Attention is restricted for the second of two targets when it is presented within 200-500 ms of the first target. This attentional blink (AB) phenomenon allows one to study the dynamics of temporal selective attention by varying the interval between the two targets (T1 and T2). Whereas the AB has long been considered as a robust and universal cognitive limitation, several studies have demonstrated that AB task performance greatly differs between individuals, with some individuals showing no AB whatsoever.Here, we studied these individual differences in AB task performance in relation to differences in attentional timing. Furthermore, we investigated whether AB magnitude is predictive for the amount of attention allocated to T1. For both these purposes pupil dilation was measured, and analyzed with our recently developed deconvolution method. We found that the dynamics of temporal attention in small versus large blinkers differ in a number of ways. Individuals with a relatively small AB magnitude seem better able to preserve temporal order information. In addition, they are quicker to allocate attention to both T1 and T2 than large blinkers. Although a popular explanation of the AB is that it is caused by an unnecessary overinvestment of attention allocated to T1, a more complex picture emerged from our data, suggesting that this may depend on whether one is a small or a large blinker.The use of pupil dilation deconvolution seems to be a powerful approach to study the temporal dynamics of attention, bringing us a step closer to understanding the elusive nature of the AB. We conclude that the timing of attention to targets may be more important than the amount of allocated attention in accounting for individual differences.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4682773?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT charlottewillems individualdifferencesintemporalselectiveattentionasreflectedinpupildilation
AT johannesherdzin individualdifferencesintemporalselectiveattentionasreflectedinpupildilation
AT sandermartens individualdifferencesintemporalselectiveattentionasreflectedinpupildilation
_version_ 1725000997554618368