Impacts of government and market on firm’s efforts to reduce pollution

We examine how the government and the market affect firm’s pollution abatement efforts, i.e. firm’s efforts to reduce its pollution emission. The way for the government to control firm’s pollution is to impose penalty, whereas the consumers (the market) make their purchasing decision by taking into...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bowon Kim, Jeong Eun Sim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2015-12-01
Series:Cogent Economics & Finance
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2015.1062634
id doaj-25d811dba4194736b69349fa674c643f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-25d811dba4194736b69349fa674c643f2020-11-24T23:49:38ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Economics & Finance2332-20392015-12-013110.1080/23322039.2015.10626341062634Impacts of government and market on firm’s efforts to reduce pollutionBowon Kim0Jeong Eun Sim1KAIST Business SchoolKAIST Business SchoolWe examine how the government and the market affect firm’s pollution abatement efforts, i.e. firm’s efforts to reduce its pollution emission. The way for the government to control firm’s pollution is to impose penalty, whereas the consumers (the market) make their purchasing decision by taking into account the pollution, i.e. the demand is affected by the stock of pollution. In effect, we consider two forces, government penalty and consumer’s sensitivity to pollution, as primary factors to control firm’s pollution and analyze their interaction in relation to the firm’s pollution reduction efforts. The analysis suggests as follows. The government penalty and the consumer’s awareness are substitutes either (1) when the market size is relatively large or (2) when the market is relatively small, but the government penalty is relatively heavy. On the contrary, the two factors are complements when the market size is relatively small and the government penalty is relatively light. We discuss managerial and economic implications of the analysis results.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2015.1062634pollution reductiongovernment penaltyconsumer awareness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bowon Kim
Jeong Eun Sim
spellingShingle Bowon Kim
Jeong Eun Sim
Impacts of government and market on firm’s efforts to reduce pollution
Cogent Economics & Finance
pollution reduction
government penalty
consumer awareness
author_facet Bowon Kim
Jeong Eun Sim
author_sort Bowon Kim
title Impacts of government and market on firm’s efforts to reduce pollution
title_short Impacts of government and market on firm’s efforts to reduce pollution
title_full Impacts of government and market on firm’s efforts to reduce pollution
title_fullStr Impacts of government and market on firm’s efforts to reduce pollution
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of government and market on firm’s efforts to reduce pollution
title_sort impacts of government and market on firm’s efforts to reduce pollution
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Economics & Finance
issn 2332-2039
publishDate 2015-12-01
description We examine how the government and the market affect firm’s pollution abatement efforts, i.e. firm’s efforts to reduce its pollution emission. The way for the government to control firm’s pollution is to impose penalty, whereas the consumers (the market) make their purchasing decision by taking into account the pollution, i.e. the demand is affected by the stock of pollution. In effect, we consider two forces, government penalty and consumer’s sensitivity to pollution, as primary factors to control firm’s pollution and analyze their interaction in relation to the firm’s pollution reduction efforts. The analysis suggests as follows. The government penalty and the consumer’s awareness are substitutes either (1) when the market size is relatively large or (2) when the market is relatively small, but the government penalty is relatively heavy. On the contrary, the two factors are complements when the market size is relatively small and the government penalty is relatively light. We discuss managerial and economic implications of the analysis results.
topic pollution reduction
government penalty
consumer awareness
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2015.1062634
work_keys_str_mv AT bowonkim impactsofgovernmentandmarketonfirmseffortstoreducepollution
AT jeongeunsim impactsofgovernmentandmarketonfirmseffortstoreducepollution
_version_ 1725481484610961408