Feeding Back the Output or Sharing the State: Which Is Better for the State-Dependent Wiretap Channel?

In this paper, the general wiretap channel with channel state information (CSI) at the transmitter and noiseless feedback is investigated, where the feedback is from the legitimate receiver to the transmitter, and the CSI is available at the transmitter in a causal or noncausal manner. The capacity-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bin Dai, Zheng Ma, Linman Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-11-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/17/12/7852
id doaj-25e086b19a024a8092e490f3c0992a12
record_format Article
spelling doaj-25e086b19a024a8092e490f3c0992a122020-11-24T23:58:37ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002015-11-0117127900792510.3390/e17127852e17127852Feeding Back the Output or Sharing the State: Which Is Better for the State-Dependent Wiretap Channel?Bin Dai0Zheng Ma1Linman Yu2School of Information Science and Technology, Southwest JiaoTong University, Northbound Section Second Ring Road 111, Chengdu 610031, ChinaSchool of Information Science and Technology, Southwest JiaoTong University, Northbound Section Second Ring Road 111, Chengdu 610031, ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, Chengdu Textile College, Chengdu 611731, ChinaIn this paper, the general wiretap channel with channel state information (CSI) at the transmitter and noiseless feedback is investigated, where the feedback is from the legitimate receiver to the transmitter, and the CSI is available at the transmitter in a causal or noncausal manner. The capacity-equivocation regions are determined for this model in both causal and noncausal cases, and the results are further explained via Gaussian and binary examples. For the Gaussian model, we find that in some particular cases, the noiseless feedback performs better than Chia and El Gamal’s CSI sharing scheme, i.e., the secrecy capacity of this feedback scheme is larger than that of the CSI sharing scheme. For the degraded binary model, we find that the noiseless feedback performs no better than Chia and El Gamal’s CSI sharing scheme. However, if the cross-over probability of the wiretap channel is large enough, we show that the two schemes perform the same.http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/17/12/7852capacity-equivocation regionchannel state informationnoiseless feedbacksecrecy capacitywiretap channel
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bin Dai
Zheng Ma
Linman Yu
spellingShingle Bin Dai
Zheng Ma
Linman Yu
Feeding Back the Output or Sharing the State: Which Is Better for the State-Dependent Wiretap Channel?
Entropy
capacity-equivocation region
channel state information
noiseless feedback
secrecy capacity
wiretap channel
author_facet Bin Dai
Zheng Ma
Linman Yu
author_sort Bin Dai
title Feeding Back the Output or Sharing the State: Which Is Better for the State-Dependent Wiretap Channel?
title_short Feeding Back the Output or Sharing the State: Which Is Better for the State-Dependent Wiretap Channel?
title_full Feeding Back the Output or Sharing the State: Which Is Better for the State-Dependent Wiretap Channel?
title_fullStr Feeding Back the Output or Sharing the State: Which Is Better for the State-Dependent Wiretap Channel?
title_full_unstemmed Feeding Back the Output or Sharing the State: Which Is Better for the State-Dependent Wiretap Channel?
title_sort feeding back the output or sharing the state: which is better for the state-dependent wiretap channel?
publisher MDPI AG
series Entropy
issn 1099-4300
publishDate 2015-11-01
description In this paper, the general wiretap channel with channel state information (CSI) at the transmitter and noiseless feedback is investigated, where the feedback is from the legitimate receiver to the transmitter, and the CSI is available at the transmitter in a causal or noncausal manner. The capacity-equivocation regions are determined for this model in both causal and noncausal cases, and the results are further explained via Gaussian and binary examples. For the Gaussian model, we find that in some particular cases, the noiseless feedback performs better than Chia and El Gamal’s CSI sharing scheme, i.e., the secrecy capacity of this feedback scheme is larger than that of the CSI sharing scheme. For the degraded binary model, we find that the noiseless feedback performs no better than Chia and El Gamal’s CSI sharing scheme. However, if the cross-over probability of the wiretap channel is large enough, we show that the two schemes perform the same.
topic capacity-equivocation region
channel state information
noiseless feedback
secrecy capacity
wiretap channel
url http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/17/12/7852
work_keys_str_mv AT bindai feedingbacktheoutputorsharingthestatewhichisbetterforthestatedependentwiretapchannel
AT zhengma feedingbacktheoutputorsharingthestatewhichisbetterforthestatedependentwiretapchannel
AT linmanyu feedingbacktheoutputorsharingthestatewhichisbetterforthestatedependentwiretapchannel
_version_ 1725450679198154752