Liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy in sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
Abstract Background We assessed the effect of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy on survival outcome in sepsis or septic shock by systematically reviewing the literature and synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods We searched the MEDLINE, C...
Main Authors: | Yohei Hirano, Yukari Miyoshi, Yutaka Kondo, Ken Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanaka |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Critical Care |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13054-019-2543-1 |
Similar Items
-
Mortality and morbidity of low-grade red blood cell transfusions in septic patients: a propensity score-matched observational study of a liberal transfusion strategy
by: Caroline Ulfsdotter Nilsson, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01) -
Will Hemoglobin Threshold for Transfusion be 7 g/dL Instead of 9 g/dL in Septic Shock?
by: Melek Tulunay
Published: (2015-04-01) -
Treatment Guidelines of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
by: Soonyoung Park, et al.
Published: (2015-06-01) -
Red blood cell transfusion in the resuscitation of septic patients with hematological malignancies
by: Adrien Mirouse, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01) -
Exchange Transfusion in the Treatment of Neonatal Septic Shock: A Ten-Year Experience in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
by: Lorenza Pugni, et al.
Published: (2016-05-01)