Oxygen Uptake in Maximal Effort Constant Rate and Interval Running

This study investigated differences in average of maximal effort interval running to maximal effort constant rate running at lactate threshold matched for time. The average and distance covered of 10 recreational male runners (: 4158 ± 390 mL·min−1) were compared between a maximal effort constant-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Pratt, Brendan J. O'Brien, Bradley Clark
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/680326
id doaj-26145031e8ea4e6ca6e524e904f320b1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-26145031e8ea4e6ca6e524e904f320b12020-11-25T02:00:10ZengHindawi LimitedThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2013-01-01201310.1155/2013/680326680326Oxygen Uptake in Maximal Effort Constant Rate and Interval RunningDaniel Pratt0Brendan J. O'Brien1Bradley Clark2School of Health Sciences, University of Ballarat, Mt Helen, Ballarat, VIC 3353, AustraliaSchool of Health Sciences, University of Ballarat, Mt Helen, Ballarat, VIC 3353, AustraliaSchool of Health Sciences, University of Ballarat, Mt Helen, Ballarat, VIC 3353, AustraliaThis study investigated differences in average of maximal effort interval running to maximal effort constant rate running at lactate threshold matched for time. The average and distance covered of 10 recreational male runners (: 4158 ± 390 mL·min−1) were compared between a maximal effort constant-rate run at lactate threshold (CRLT), a maximal effort interval run (INT) consisting of 2 min at speed with 2 minutes at 50% of repeated 5 times, and a run at the average speed sustained during the interval run (CR submax). Data are presented as mean and 95% confidence intervals. The average for INT, 3451 (3269–3633) mL·min−1, 83% , was not significantly different to CRLT, 3464 (3285–3643) mL·min−1, 84% , but both were significantly higher than CR sub-max, 3464 (3285–3643) mL·min−1, 76% . The distance covered was significantly greater in CLRT, 4431 (4202–3731) metres, compared to INT and CR sub-max, 4070 (3831–4309) metres. The novel finding was that a 20-minute maximal effort constant rate run uses similar amounts of oxygen as a 20-minute maximal effort interval run despite the greater distance covered in the maximal effort constant-rate run.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/680326
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel Pratt
Brendan J. O'Brien
Bradley Clark
spellingShingle Daniel Pratt
Brendan J. O'Brien
Bradley Clark
Oxygen Uptake in Maximal Effort Constant Rate and Interval Running
The Scientific World Journal
author_facet Daniel Pratt
Brendan J. O'Brien
Bradley Clark
author_sort Daniel Pratt
title Oxygen Uptake in Maximal Effort Constant Rate and Interval Running
title_short Oxygen Uptake in Maximal Effort Constant Rate and Interval Running
title_full Oxygen Uptake in Maximal Effort Constant Rate and Interval Running
title_fullStr Oxygen Uptake in Maximal Effort Constant Rate and Interval Running
title_full_unstemmed Oxygen Uptake in Maximal Effort Constant Rate and Interval Running
title_sort oxygen uptake in maximal effort constant rate and interval running
publisher Hindawi Limited
series The Scientific World Journal
issn 1537-744X
publishDate 2013-01-01
description This study investigated differences in average of maximal effort interval running to maximal effort constant rate running at lactate threshold matched for time. The average and distance covered of 10 recreational male runners (: 4158 ± 390 mL·min−1) were compared between a maximal effort constant-rate run at lactate threshold (CRLT), a maximal effort interval run (INT) consisting of 2 min at speed with 2 minutes at 50% of repeated 5 times, and a run at the average speed sustained during the interval run (CR submax). Data are presented as mean and 95% confidence intervals. The average for INT, 3451 (3269–3633) mL·min−1, 83% , was not significantly different to CRLT, 3464 (3285–3643) mL·min−1, 84% , but both were significantly higher than CR sub-max, 3464 (3285–3643) mL·min−1, 76% . The distance covered was significantly greater in CLRT, 4431 (4202–3731) metres, compared to INT and CR sub-max, 4070 (3831–4309) metres. The novel finding was that a 20-minute maximal effort constant rate run uses similar amounts of oxygen as a 20-minute maximal effort interval run despite the greater distance covered in the maximal effort constant-rate run.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/680326
work_keys_str_mv AT danielpratt oxygenuptakeinmaximaleffortconstantrateandintervalrunning
AT brendanjobrien oxygenuptakeinmaximaleffortconstantrateandintervalrunning
AT bradleyclark oxygenuptakeinmaximaleffortconstantrateandintervalrunning
_version_ 1724962079926910976