Evaluation of Different Dialyzers and the Impact of Predialysis Albumin Priming in Intermittent Hemodialysis With Reduced Anticoagulation

Introduction: Systemic anticoagulation is widely used in routine clinical hemodialysis, but can be contraindicated in specific settings. Anticoagulant-free treatment regimens are prone to failure even in chronic intermittent hemodialysis. We quantified fiber blocking in settings of reduced anticoagu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Floris Vanommeslaeghe, Filip De Somer, Iván Josipovic, Matthieu Boone, Wim Van Biesen, Sunny Eloot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-11-01
Series:Kidney International Reports
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024919314275
id doaj-26209a1b470c4e18baf6b3f641ffd821
record_format Article
spelling doaj-26209a1b470c4e18baf6b3f641ffd8212020-11-25T01:32:47ZengElsevierKidney International Reports2468-02492019-11-0141115381545Evaluation of Different Dialyzers and the Impact of Predialysis Albumin Priming in Intermittent Hemodialysis With Reduced AnticoagulationFloris Vanommeslaeghe0Filip De Somer1Iván Josipovic2Matthieu Boone3Wim Van Biesen4Sunny Eloot5Department of Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, BelgiumDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, BelgiumCentre for X-ray Tomography, Physics and Astronomy, Ghent University, BelgiumCentre for X-ray Tomography, Physics and Astronomy, Ghent University, BelgiumDepartment of Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, BelgiumDepartment of Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium; Correspondence: Sunny Eloot, Hemodialysis Unit 1P8, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Gent, Belgium.Introduction: Systemic anticoagulation is widely used in routine clinical hemodialysis, but can be contraindicated in specific settings. Anticoagulant-free treatment regimens are prone to failure even in chronic intermittent hemodialysis. We quantified fiber blocking in settings of reduced anticoagulation to assess performance of different dialyzers and the potential benefit of albumin priming. Methods: This crossover study included 10 patients performing 4 hours of hemodialysis at midweek in 7 different settings: that is, using Solacea 19H and FX800, both with regular and half dose of anticoagulation, Evodial 1.3 without systemic anticoagulation, and FX800 (half dose) and Evodial (no anticoagulation) when primed with a human albumin solution. Dialyzer fiber blocking was visualized in the dialyzer outlet potting using a 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scanning technique on micrometer resolution. Results: No sessions had to be prematurely interrupted because of circuit clotting. The relative number of open fibers post dialysis was not influenced by the reduction of anticoagulation in the Solacea making this dialyzer superior in fiber patency in this setting above both the FX800 with reduced anticoagulation and the Evodial with no anticoagulation. Furthermore, no differences in relative number of open fibers were found in the FX800 and Evodial dialyzers with versus without albumin priming. Conclusion: In situations in which reduced anticoagulation is indicated, the asymmetric triacetate ATA Solacea dialyzer outperforms a dialyzer with a conventional polysulfone membrane (FX800) or with the heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membrane (Evodial). The use of human albumin to prime the dialysis circuit did not improve dialyzer patency. Keywords: albumin priming, clotting, coagulation, dialyzer, fiber patency, zero anticoagulationhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024919314275
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Floris Vanommeslaeghe
Filip De Somer
Iván Josipovic
Matthieu Boone
Wim Van Biesen
Sunny Eloot
spellingShingle Floris Vanommeslaeghe
Filip De Somer
Iván Josipovic
Matthieu Boone
Wim Van Biesen
Sunny Eloot
Evaluation of Different Dialyzers and the Impact of Predialysis Albumin Priming in Intermittent Hemodialysis With Reduced Anticoagulation
Kidney International Reports
author_facet Floris Vanommeslaeghe
Filip De Somer
Iván Josipovic
Matthieu Boone
Wim Van Biesen
Sunny Eloot
author_sort Floris Vanommeslaeghe
title Evaluation of Different Dialyzers and the Impact of Predialysis Albumin Priming in Intermittent Hemodialysis With Reduced Anticoagulation
title_short Evaluation of Different Dialyzers and the Impact of Predialysis Albumin Priming in Intermittent Hemodialysis With Reduced Anticoagulation
title_full Evaluation of Different Dialyzers and the Impact of Predialysis Albumin Priming in Intermittent Hemodialysis With Reduced Anticoagulation
title_fullStr Evaluation of Different Dialyzers and the Impact of Predialysis Albumin Priming in Intermittent Hemodialysis With Reduced Anticoagulation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Different Dialyzers and the Impact of Predialysis Albumin Priming in Intermittent Hemodialysis With Reduced Anticoagulation
title_sort evaluation of different dialyzers and the impact of predialysis albumin priming in intermittent hemodialysis with reduced anticoagulation
publisher Elsevier
series Kidney International Reports
issn 2468-0249
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Introduction: Systemic anticoagulation is widely used in routine clinical hemodialysis, but can be contraindicated in specific settings. Anticoagulant-free treatment regimens are prone to failure even in chronic intermittent hemodialysis. We quantified fiber blocking in settings of reduced anticoagulation to assess performance of different dialyzers and the potential benefit of albumin priming. Methods: This crossover study included 10 patients performing 4 hours of hemodialysis at midweek in 7 different settings: that is, using Solacea 19H and FX800, both with regular and half dose of anticoagulation, Evodial 1.3 without systemic anticoagulation, and FX800 (half dose) and Evodial (no anticoagulation) when primed with a human albumin solution. Dialyzer fiber blocking was visualized in the dialyzer outlet potting using a 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scanning technique on micrometer resolution. Results: No sessions had to be prematurely interrupted because of circuit clotting. The relative number of open fibers post dialysis was not influenced by the reduction of anticoagulation in the Solacea making this dialyzer superior in fiber patency in this setting above both the FX800 with reduced anticoagulation and the Evodial with no anticoagulation. Furthermore, no differences in relative number of open fibers were found in the FX800 and Evodial dialyzers with versus without albumin priming. Conclusion: In situations in which reduced anticoagulation is indicated, the asymmetric triacetate ATA Solacea dialyzer outperforms a dialyzer with a conventional polysulfone membrane (FX800) or with the heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membrane (Evodial). The use of human albumin to prime the dialysis circuit did not improve dialyzer patency. Keywords: albumin priming, clotting, coagulation, dialyzer, fiber patency, zero anticoagulation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024919314275
work_keys_str_mv AT florisvanommeslaeghe evaluationofdifferentdialyzersandtheimpactofpredialysisalbuminpriminginintermittenthemodialysiswithreducedanticoagulation
AT filipdesomer evaluationofdifferentdialyzersandtheimpactofpredialysisalbuminpriminginintermittenthemodialysiswithreducedanticoagulation
AT ivanjosipovic evaluationofdifferentdialyzersandtheimpactofpredialysisalbuminpriminginintermittenthemodialysiswithreducedanticoagulation
AT matthieuboone evaluationofdifferentdialyzersandtheimpactofpredialysisalbuminpriminginintermittenthemodialysiswithreducedanticoagulation
AT wimvanbiesen evaluationofdifferentdialyzersandtheimpactofpredialysisalbuminpriminginintermittenthemodialysiswithreducedanticoagulation
AT sunnyeloot evaluationofdifferentdialyzersandtheimpactofpredialysisalbuminpriminginintermittenthemodialysiswithreducedanticoagulation
_version_ 1725079821570015232