Our experience with Miniperc XS in the management of renal stones

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Miniperc (MIP) XS (7.5 Fr) nephroscope in the treatment of renal stones up to 20 mm. Methods: This was a prospective study that enrolled 65 patients with limited stone burden in calyx or pelvis, which were treated with MIP XS...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vilas Sabale, Prasun Pramanik, Deepakkumar Mane, Vikram Satav, Avreen Singh Shah, Niraj Chaudari, Ashwani Kandari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Urological Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-urol-sci.com/article.asp?issn=1879-5226;year=2019;volume=30;issue=1;spage=36;epage=39;aulast=Sabale
id doaj-2628063af8214f4cbe96c3ff59714587
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2628063af8214f4cbe96c3ff597145872020-11-25T00:03:25ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsUrological Science1879-52261879-52342019-01-01301363910.4103/UROS.UROS_107_18Our experience with Miniperc XS in the management of renal stonesVilas SabalePrasun PramanikDeepakkumar ManeVikram SatavAvreen Singh ShahNiraj ChaudariAshwani KandariObjective: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Miniperc (MIP) XS (7.5 Fr) nephroscope in the treatment of renal stones up to 20 mm. Methods: This was a prospective study that enrolled 65 patients with limited stone burden in calyx or pelvis, which were treated with MIP XS. Primary outcomes included stone-free rates (SFRs), operative time, length of postoperative hospital stay, requirement of analgesic postsurgery, decline in hematocrit, stent requirement, and complications and requirement of ancillary procedure. Results: The mean stone size was 17.46 ± 2.9 mm. The patients were treated with MIP XS and had a mean operative time of 38.63 ± 8.4 min, 1.74% drop in hematocrit levels postsurgery and 96.9% SFRs. The length of hospital stay was 55.48 ± 4.6 h. Postoperative fever and nephrostomy leakage occurred in 9 and 1 patients, respectively. Six cases required some drainage procedure (double-J stent/nephrostomy). No patient required blood transfusion. Conclusion: This study showed that MIP XS could be considered as an effective treatment option in the treatment of renal stones up to 20 mm as it scores in all the standard parameters used to measure percutaneous nephrolithotripsy outcomes.http://www.e-urol-sci.com/article.asp?issn=1879-5226;year=2019;volume=30;issue=1;spage=36;epage=39;aulast=SabaleMinipercMiniperc XSpercutaneous nephrolithotripsyrenal calculi
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vilas Sabale
Prasun Pramanik
Deepakkumar Mane
Vikram Satav
Avreen Singh Shah
Niraj Chaudari
Ashwani Kandari
spellingShingle Vilas Sabale
Prasun Pramanik
Deepakkumar Mane
Vikram Satav
Avreen Singh Shah
Niraj Chaudari
Ashwani Kandari
Our experience with Miniperc XS in the management of renal stones
Urological Science
Miniperc
Miniperc XS
percutaneous nephrolithotripsy
renal calculi
author_facet Vilas Sabale
Prasun Pramanik
Deepakkumar Mane
Vikram Satav
Avreen Singh Shah
Niraj Chaudari
Ashwani Kandari
author_sort Vilas Sabale
title Our experience with Miniperc XS in the management of renal stones
title_short Our experience with Miniperc XS in the management of renal stones
title_full Our experience with Miniperc XS in the management of renal stones
title_fullStr Our experience with Miniperc XS in the management of renal stones
title_full_unstemmed Our experience with Miniperc XS in the management of renal stones
title_sort our experience with miniperc xs in the management of renal stones
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Urological Science
issn 1879-5226
1879-5234
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Miniperc (MIP) XS (7.5 Fr) nephroscope in the treatment of renal stones up to 20 mm. Methods: This was a prospective study that enrolled 65 patients with limited stone burden in calyx or pelvis, which were treated with MIP XS. Primary outcomes included stone-free rates (SFRs), operative time, length of postoperative hospital stay, requirement of analgesic postsurgery, decline in hematocrit, stent requirement, and complications and requirement of ancillary procedure. Results: The mean stone size was 17.46 ± 2.9 mm. The patients were treated with MIP XS and had a mean operative time of 38.63 ± 8.4 min, 1.74% drop in hematocrit levels postsurgery and 96.9% SFRs. The length of hospital stay was 55.48 ± 4.6 h. Postoperative fever and nephrostomy leakage occurred in 9 and 1 patients, respectively. Six cases required some drainage procedure (double-J stent/nephrostomy). No patient required blood transfusion. Conclusion: This study showed that MIP XS could be considered as an effective treatment option in the treatment of renal stones up to 20 mm as it scores in all the standard parameters used to measure percutaneous nephrolithotripsy outcomes.
topic Miniperc
Miniperc XS
percutaneous nephrolithotripsy
renal calculi
url http://www.e-urol-sci.com/article.asp?issn=1879-5226;year=2019;volume=30;issue=1;spage=36;epage=39;aulast=Sabale
work_keys_str_mv AT vilassabale ourexperiencewithminipercxsinthemanagementofrenalstones
AT prasunpramanik ourexperiencewithminipercxsinthemanagementofrenalstones
AT deepakkumarmane ourexperiencewithminipercxsinthemanagementofrenalstones
AT vikramsatav ourexperiencewithminipercxsinthemanagementofrenalstones
AT avreensinghshah ourexperiencewithminipercxsinthemanagementofrenalstones
AT nirajchaudari ourexperiencewithminipercxsinthemanagementofrenalstones
AT ashwanikandari ourexperiencewithminipercxsinthemanagementofrenalstones
_version_ 1725434116303749120