A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Safety of Dapagliflozin in Type 1 Diabetes Patients

Background and Purpose: The dapagliflozin’s safety profile in insulin-treated adult type-1 diabetes mellites (T1DM) patients remains poorly explored. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis compared the risk of all-cause side effects, study discontinuation of participants due to side eff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sumanta Saha, Sujata Saha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences 2020-06-01
Series:علوم بهداشتی ایران
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jhs.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-708-en.html
id doaj-2637513ca46646d3bbe9e2898334c305
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2637513ca46646d3bbe9e2898334c3052020-11-25T03:26:37ZengMazandaran University of Medical Sciencesعلوم بهداشتی ایران2322-553X2322-47972020-06-01824558A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Safety of Dapagliflozin in Type 1 Diabetes PatientsSumanta Saha0Sujata Saha1 National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India Mankar College, Mankar, West Bengal, India Background and Purpose: The dapagliflozin’s safety profile in insulin-treated adult type-1 diabetes mellites (T1DM) patients remains poorly explored. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis compared the risk of all-cause side effects, study discontinuation of participants due to side effects, urinary tract infection (UTI), diabetic ketoacidosis, and hypoglycemia between dapagliflozin 10 mg and dapagliflozin 5 mg, dapagliflozin 10 mg and placebo, and dapagliflozin 5 mg and placebo. Materials and Methods: Parallel-arm randomized controlled trials juxtaposing the above outcomes between the afore-mentioned interventions were eligible for inclusion in this study and were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Utilizing the Cochrane tool, the risk of bias was assessed in the recruited trials. Finally, by random-effect meta-analysis, each outcome was compared among the above interventions, and the risk ratio was estimated. Results: Four trials of varying length (1-52 weeks) sourcing data from almost 1760 participants from about 32 nations were reviewed. Overall, the trials had a low or unclear risk of bias, and only one was at a high risk of bias.  Compared to the placebo, the risk of side effects was higher in those treated with dapagliflozin 5 mg (RR=1.10; 95% CI=1.02-1.18; p=0.014; I2=0%). UTI risk was less with the 10mg dapagliflozin than its lower dose (RR=0.50; 95% CI=0.32-0.79; p-value=0.003; I2=0%). All the remaining comparisons were statistically not significantly different between the juxtaposed intervention pairs. Conclusion: In contrast to placebo, dapagliflozin 5mg increased the risk of overall adversities in insulin-treated type-1 diabetes, and dapagliflozin 10 mg had a reduced risk of UTI than its 5mg preparation.http://jhs.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-708-en.htmldapagliflozindiabetes mellitustype 1side effectdrugdrug toxicitysodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sumanta Saha
Sujata Saha
spellingShingle Sumanta Saha
Sujata Saha
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Safety of Dapagliflozin in Type 1 Diabetes Patients
علوم بهداشتی ایران
dapagliflozin
diabetes mellitus
type 1
side effect
drug
drug toxicity
sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors
author_facet Sumanta Saha
Sujata Saha
author_sort Sumanta Saha
title A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Safety of Dapagliflozin in Type 1 Diabetes Patients
title_short A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Safety of Dapagliflozin in Type 1 Diabetes Patients
title_full A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Safety of Dapagliflozin in Type 1 Diabetes Patients
title_fullStr A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Safety of Dapagliflozin in Type 1 Diabetes Patients
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Safety of Dapagliflozin in Type 1 Diabetes Patients
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the safety of dapagliflozin in type 1 diabetes patients
publisher Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
series علوم بهداشتی ایران
issn 2322-553X
2322-4797
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Background and Purpose: The dapagliflozin’s safety profile in insulin-treated adult type-1 diabetes mellites (T1DM) patients remains poorly explored. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis compared the risk of all-cause side effects, study discontinuation of participants due to side effects, urinary tract infection (UTI), diabetic ketoacidosis, and hypoglycemia between dapagliflozin 10 mg and dapagliflozin 5 mg, dapagliflozin 10 mg and placebo, and dapagliflozin 5 mg and placebo. Materials and Methods: Parallel-arm randomized controlled trials juxtaposing the above outcomes between the afore-mentioned interventions were eligible for inclusion in this study and were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Utilizing the Cochrane tool, the risk of bias was assessed in the recruited trials. Finally, by random-effect meta-analysis, each outcome was compared among the above interventions, and the risk ratio was estimated. Results: Four trials of varying length (1-52 weeks) sourcing data from almost 1760 participants from about 32 nations were reviewed. Overall, the trials had a low or unclear risk of bias, and only one was at a high risk of bias.  Compared to the placebo, the risk of side effects was higher in those treated with dapagliflozin 5 mg (RR=1.10; 95% CI=1.02-1.18; p=0.014; I2=0%). UTI risk was less with the 10mg dapagliflozin than its lower dose (RR=0.50; 95% CI=0.32-0.79; p-value=0.003; I2=0%). All the remaining comparisons were statistically not significantly different between the juxtaposed intervention pairs. Conclusion: In contrast to placebo, dapagliflozin 5mg increased the risk of overall adversities in insulin-treated type-1 diabetes, and dapagliflozin 10 mg had a reduced risk of UTI than its 5mg preparation.
topic dapagliflozin
diabetes mellitus
type 1
side effect
drug
drug toxicity
sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors
url http://jhs.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-708-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT sumantasaha asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialscomparingthesafetyofdapagliflozinintype1diabetespatients
AT sujatasaha asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialscomparingthesafetyofdapagliflozinintype1diabetespatients
AT sumantasaha systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialscomparingthesafetyofdapagliflozinintype1diabetespatients
AT sujatasaha systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialscomparingthesafetyofdapagliflozinintype1diabetespatients
_version_ 1724591772675342336