Facility‐Level Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Readmission Rates Are Not Associated With Facility‐Level Mortality: Insights From the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) Program
Background Thirty‐day readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is common, costly, and linked to poor patient outcomes. Accordingly, facility‐level 30‐day readmission rates have been considered as a potential quality measure. However, it is unknown whether facility‐level 30‐day read...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2016-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003503 |
id |
doaj-2645b2b102ca4dc4a398f91380ad28eb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2645b2b102ca4dc4a398f91380ad28eb2020-11-25T04:02:03ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802016-09-0159n/an/a10.1161/JAHA.116.003503Facility‐Level Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Readmission Rates Are Not Associated With Facility‐Level Mortality: Insights From the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) ProgramTimothy W. Hegeman0Thomas J. Glorioso1Edward Hess2Anna E. Barón3P. Michael Ho4Thomas M. Maddox5Steven M. Bradley6Robert E. Burke7University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora COColorado Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Consortium Denver COColorado Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Consortium Denver COUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora COUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora COUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora COUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora COUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora COBackground Thirty‐day readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is common, costly, and linked to poor patient outcomes. Accordingly, facility‐level 30‐day readmission rates have been considered as a potential quality measure. However, it is unknown whether facility‐level 30‐day readmission rates are associated with facility‐level mortality. We sought to determine the effect of 30‐day readmissions after PCI on mortality at both the patient and facility level in the Veterans Administration hospital system. Methods and Results We included all patients who underwent PCI in the Veterans Administration hospital system nationally from October 2007 through August 2012, comparing all‐cause mortality rates between patients with and without 30‐day readmissions following PCI. Patients were then aggregated at the hospital level to evaluate the correlation between hospital‐level readmission rates with hospital‐level 1‐year mortality rates. Among 41 069 patients undergoing PCI at 62 sites, 12.2% were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Patients with 30‐day readmission had higher risk‐adjusted mortality (hazard ratio 1.53, 95% CI 1.44–1.63, P<0.0001). Facilities varied widely in 30‐day readmission rates (systemwide range of 6.6–19.4%, median 11.8%, interquartile range 10.0–13.2%); however, adjusted facility‐level readmission rates were not correlated with adjusted 1‐year mortality rates. Conclusions Thirty‐day readmissions after PCI are common and are a significant risk factor for mortality for individual patients even after robust statistical adjustment for clinical confounding. However, lack of correlation between readmission and mortality at the facility level suggests that quality improvement based on facility‐level readmission rates will not modify mortality in this high‐risk group.https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003503cardiac catheterizationcardiovascular outcomescoronary artery diseasemortalityreadmission |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Timothy W. Hegeman Thomas J. Glorioso Edward Hess Anna E. Barón P. Michael Ho Thomas M. Maddox Steven M. Bradley Robert E. Burke |
spellingShingle |
Timothy W. Hegeman Thomas J. Glorioso Edward Hess Anna E. Barón P. Michael Ho Thomas M. Maddox Steven M. Bradley Robert E. Burke Facility‐Level Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Readmission Rates Are Not Associated With Facility‐Level Mortality: Insights From the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) Program Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease cardiac catheterization cardiovascular outcomes coronary artery disease mortality readmission |
author_facet |
Timothy W. Hegeman Thomas J. Glorioso Edward Hess Anna E. Barón P. Michael Ho Thomas M. Maddox Steven M. Bradley Robert E. Burke |
author_sort |
Timothy W. Hegeman |
title |
Facility‐Level Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Readmission Rates Are Not Associated With Facility‐Level Mortality: Insights From the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) Program |
title_short |
Facility‐Level Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Readmission Rates Are Not Associated With Facility‐Level Mortality: Insights From the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) Program |
title_full |
Facility‐Level Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Readmission Rates Are Not Associated With Facility‐Level Mortality: Insights From the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) Program |
title_fullStr |
Facility‐Level Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Readmission Rates Are Not Associated With Facility‐Level Mortality: Insights From the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) Program |
title_full_unstemmed |
Facility‐Level Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Readmission Rates Are Not Associated With Facility‐Level Mortality: Insights From the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) Program |
title_sort |
facility‐level percutaneous coronary intervention readmission rates are not associated with facility‐level mortality: insights from the va clinical assessment, reporting, and tracking (cart) program |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease |
issn |
2047-9980 |
publishDate |
2016-09-01 |
description |
Background Thirty‐day readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is common, costly, and linked to poor patient outcomes. Accordingly, facility‐level 30‐day readmission rates have been considered as a potential quality measure. However, it is unknown whether facility‐level 30‐day readmission rates are associated with facility‐level mortality. We sought to determine the effect of 30‐day readmissions after PCI on mortality at both the patient and facility level in the Veterans Administration hospital system. Methods and Results We included all patients who underwent PCI in the Veterans Administration hospital system nationally from October 2007 through August 2012, comparing all‐cause mortality rates between patients with and without 30‐day readmissions following PCI. Patients were then aggregated at the hospital level to evaluate the correlation between hospital‐level readmission rates with hospital‐level 1‐year mortality rates. Among 41 069 patients undergoing PCI at 62 sites, 12.2% were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Patients with 30‐day readmission had higher risk‐adjusted mortality (hazard ratio 1.53, 95% CI 1.44–1.63, P<0.0001). Facilities varied widely in 30‐day readmission rates (systemwide range of 6.6–19.4%, median 11.8%, interquartile range 10.0–13.2%); however, adjusted facility‐level readmission rates were not correlated with adjusted 1‐year mortality rates. Conclusions Thirty‐day readmissions after PCI are common and are a significant risk factor for mortality for individual patients even after robust statistical adjustment for clinical confounding. However, lack of correlation between readmission and mortality at the facility level suggests that quality improvement based on facility‐level readmission rates will not modify mortality in this high‐risk group. |
topic |
cardiac catheterization cardiovascular outcomes coronary artery disease mortality readmission |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003503 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT timothywhegeman facilitylevelpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreadmissionratesarenotassociatedwithfacilitylevelmortalityinsightsfromthevaclinicalassessmentreportingandtrackingcartprogram AT thomasjglorioso facilitylevelpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreadmissionratesarenotassociatedwithfacilitylevelmortalityinsightsfromthevaclinicalassessmentreportingandtrackingcartprogram AT edwardhess facilitylevelpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreadmissionratesarenotassociatedwithfacilitylevelmortalityinsightsfromthevaclinicalassessmentreportingandtrackingcartprogram AT annaebaron facilitylevelpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreadmissionratesarenotassociatedwithfacilitylevelmortalityinsightsfromthevaclinicalassessmentreportingandtrackingcartprogram AT pmichaelho facilitylevelpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreadmissionratesarenotassociatedwithfacilitylevelmortalityinsightsfromthevaclinicalassessmentreportingandtrackingcartprogram AT thomasmmaddox facilitylevelpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreadmissionratesarenotassociatedwithfacilitylevelmortalityinsightsfromthevaclinicalassessmentreportingandtrackingcartprogram AT stevenmbradley facilitylevelpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreadmissionratesarenotassociatedwithfacilitylevelmortalityinsightsfromthevaclinicalassessmentreportingandtrackingcartprogram AT roberteburke facilitylevelpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreadmissionratesarenotassociatedwithfacilitylevelmortalityinsightsfromthevaclinicalassessmentreportingandtrackingcartprogram |
_version_ |
1724444482686943232 |