Experimental Fracture Model versus Osteotomy Model in Metacarpal Bone Plate Fixation

Introduction. Osteotomy or fracture models can be used to evaluate mechanical properties of fixation techniques of the hand skeleton in vitro. Although many studies make use of osteotomy models, fracture models simulate the clinical situation more realistically. This study investigates monocortical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Ochman, T. Vordemvenne, J. Paletta, M. J. Raschke, R. H. Meffert, S. Doht
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2011-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2011/465371
id doaj-2656240821f14f24a239a3ff9013d041
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2656240821f14f24a239a3ff9013d0412020-11-25T02:00:33ZengHindawi LimitedThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2011-01-01111692169810.1100/2011/465371465371Experimental Fracture Model versus Osteotomy Model in Metacarpal Bone Plate FixationS. Ochman0T. Vordemvenne1J. Paletta2M. J. Raschke3R. H. Meffert4S. Doht5Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Münster, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1, Building W1, 48149 Münster, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Münster, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1, Building W1, 48149 Münster, GermanyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Münster, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1, Building W1, 48149 Münster, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Würzburg, 97070 Würzburg, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Würzburg, 97070 Würzburg, GermanyIntroduction. Osteotomy or fracture models can be used to evaluate mechanical properties of fixation techniques of the hand skeleton in vitro. Although many studies make use of osteotomy models, fracture models simulate the clinical situation more realistically. This study investigates monocortical and bicortical plate fixation on metacarpal bones considering both aforementioned models to decide which method is best suited to test fixation techniques. Methods. Porcine metacarpal bones (𝑛=40) were randomized into 4 groups. In groups I and II bones were fractured with a modified 3-point bending test. The intact bones represented a further control group to which the other groups after fixation were compared. In groups III and IV a standard osteotomy was carried out. Bones were fixated with plates monocortically (group I, III) and bicortically (group II, IV) and tested for failure. Results. Bones fractured at a mean maximum load of 482.8 N ± 104.8 N with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 21.7%, mean stiffness was 122.3 ± 35 N/mm. In the fracture model, there was a significant difference (𝑃=0.01) for maximum load of monocortically and bicortically fixed bones in contrast to the osteotomy model (𝑃=0.9). Discussion. In the fracture model, because one can use the same bone for both measurements in the intact state and the bone-plate construct states, the impact of inter-individual differences is reduced. In contrast to the osteotomy model there are differences between monocortical and bicortical fixations in the fracture model. Thus simulation of the in vivo situation is better and seems to be suitable for the evaluation of mechanical properties of fixation techniques on metacarpals.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2011/465371
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. Ochman
T. Vordemvenne
J. Paletta
M. J. Raschke
R. H. Meffert
S. Doht
spellingShingle S. Ochman
T. Vordemvenne
J. Paletta
M. J. Raschke
R. H. Meffert
S. Doht
Experimental Fracture Model versus Osteotomy Model in Metacarpal Bone Plate Fixation
The Scientific World Journal
author_facet S. Ochman
T. Vordemvenne
J. Paletta
M. J. Raschke
R. H. Meffert
S. Doht
author_sort S. Ochman
title Experimental Fracture Model versus Osteotomy Model in Metacarpal Bone Plate Fixation
title_short Experimental Fracture Model versus Osteotomy Model in Metacarpal Bone Plate Fixation
title_full Experimental Fracture Model versus Osteotomy Model in Metacarpal Bone Plate Fixation
title_fullStr Experimental Fracture Model versus Osteotomy Model in Metacarpal Bone Plate Fixation
title_full_unstemmed Experimental Fracture Model versus Osteotomy Model in Metacarpal Bone Plate Fixation
title_sort experimental fracture model versus osteotomy model in metacarpal bone plate fixation
publisher Hindawi Limited
series The Scientific World Journal
issn 1537-744X
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Introduction. Osteotomy or fracture models can be used to evaluate mechanical properties of fixation techniques of the hand skeleton in vitro. Although many studies make use of osteotomy models, fracture models simulate the clinical situation more realistically. This study investigates monocortical and bicortical plate fixation on metacarpal bones considering both aforementioned models to decide which method is best suited to test fixation techniques. Methods. Porcine metacarpal bones (𝑛=40) were randomized into 4 groups. In groups I and II bones were fractured with a modified 3-point bending test. The intact bones represented a further control group to which the other groups after fixation were compared. In groups III and IV a standard osteotomy was carried out. Bones were fixated with plates monocortically (group I, III) and bicortically (group II, IV) and tested for failure. Results. Bones fractured at a mean maximum load of 482.8 N ± 104.8 N with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 21.7%, mean stiffness was 122.3 ± 35 N/mm. In the fracture model, there was a significant difference (𝑃=0.01) for maximum load of monocortically and bicortically fixed bones in contrast to the osteotomy model (𝑃=0.9). Discussion. In the fracture model, because one can use the same bone for both measurements in the intact state and the bone-plate construct states, the impact of inter-individual differences is reduced. In contrast to the osteotomy model there are differences between monocortical and bicortical fixations in the fracture model. Thus simulation of the in vivo situation is better and seems to be suitable for the evaluation of mechanical properties of fixation techniques on metacarpals.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2011/465371
work_keys_str_mv AT sochman experimentalfracturemodelversusosteotomymodelinmetacarpalboneplatefixation
AT tvordemvenne experimentalfracturemodelversusosteotomymodelinmetacarpalboneplatefixation
AT jpaletta experimentalfracturemodelversusosteotomymodelinmetacarpalboneplatefixation
AT mjraschke experimentalfracturemodelversusosteotomymodelinmetacarpalboneplatefixation
AT rhmeffert experimentalfracturemodelversusosteotomymodelinmetacarpalboneplatefixation
AT sdoht experimentalfracturemodelversusosteotomymodelinmetacarpalboneplatefixation
_version_ 1724959728400859136