Retinoblastoma in twins: Risk assessment of genotypic variants

Purpose: To describe methods of risk assessment in twins with retinoblastoma (RB). Methods: A case series of four RB probands with a twin sibling. Family status, clinical presentation, and RB1 germline status-based risk assessment were analyzed. Results: Two pairs had a positive family history (unil...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vishal Raval, Meghan DeBenedictis, Randy Bowen, Hansell Soto, Jacquelyn Davanzo, Arun Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2021;volume=69;issue=5;spage=1230;epage=1233;aulast=Raval
id doaj-26b5db1d3cc147e88236329a6956e80a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-26b5db1d3cc147e88236329a6956e80a2021-05-05T11:15:38ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892021-01-016951230123310.4103/ijo.IJO_2811_20Retinoblastoma in twins: Risk assessment of genotypic variantsVishal RavalMeghan DeBenedictisRandy BowenHansell SotoJacquelyn DavanzoArun SinghPurpose: To describe methods of risk assessment in twins with retinoblastoma (RB). Methods: A case series of four RB probands with a twin sibling. Family status, clinical presentation, and RB1 germline status-based risk assessment were analyzed. Results: Two pairs had a positive family history (unilateral and bilateral RB in one of the parents (#1 and #2, respectively) and two pairs (#3 and #4) were sporadic. One of the familial twins (#1) had a high risk (90%) of manifesting RB in the twin. The other case (#2) with an absent RB1 germline mutation in the twin had a 0% risk of developing RB. Among sporadic cases of twins (#3), genetic testing did not identify a germline mutation (tumor sample unavailable) in the proband which downgraded the risk of germline mutation from 15% to <1%. The twin never developed RB (5 years of age at last follow-up). Pathogenic mosaicism for germline RB1 mutation (c.1723C>T) could be identified (tumor tissue available) in the proband (# 4). Identical germline mutation (and RB tumor) was also noted in the twin. In each case, there was concordance between the assessed risk and manifestation of RB. Conclusion: Assessment of risk of RB in a twin presents with a unique challenge. Depending upon the genotype variant, the risk of developing RB can vary from 0% to 90%. In addition to family history, clinical manifestation in the proband, zygosity status, and RB1 germline status are critical in formulating risk-appropriate surveillance guidelines.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2021;volume=69;issue=5;spage=1230;epage=1233;aulast=Ravalgenetic testinggermlinemosaicretinoblastomatwins
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vishal Raval
Meghan DeBenedictis
Randy Bowen
Hansell Soto
Jacquelyn Davanzo
Arun Singh
spellingShingle Vishal Raval
Meghan DeBenedictis
Randy Bowen
Hansell Soto
Jacquelyn Davanzo
Arun Singh
Retinoblastoma in twins: Risk assessment of genotypic variants
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
genetic testing
germline
mosaic
retinoblastoma
twins
author_facet Vishal Raval
Meghan DeBenedictis
Randy Bowen
Hansell Soto
Jacquelyn Davanzo
Arun Singh
author_sort Vishal Raval
title Retinoblastoma in twins: Risk assessment of genotypic variants
title_short Retinoblastoma in twins: Risk assessment of genotypic variants
title_full Retinoblastoma in twins: Risk assessment of genotypic variants
title_fullStr Retinoblastoma in twins: Risk assessment of genotypic variants
title_full_unstemmed Retinoblastoma in twins: Risk assessment of genotypic variants
title_sort retinoblastoma in twins: risk assessment of genotypic variants
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Purpose: To describe methods of risk assessment in twins with retinoblastoma (RB). Methods: A case series of four RB probands with a twin sibling. Family status, clinical presentation, and RB1 germline status-based risk assessment were analyzed. Results: Two pairs had a positive family history (unilateral and bilateral RB in one of the parents (#1 and #2, respectively) and two pairs (#3 and #4) were sporadic. One of the familial twins (#1) had a high risk (90%) of manifesting RB in the twin. The other case (#2) with an absent RB1 germline mutation in the twin had a 0% risk of developing RB. Among sporadic cases of twins (#3), genetic testing did not identify a germline mutation (tumor sample unavailable) in the proband which downgraded the risk of germline mutation from 15% to <1%. The twin never developed RB (5 years of age at last follow-up). Pathogenic mosaicism for germline RB1 mutation (c.1723C>T) could be identified (tumor tissue available) in the proband (# 4). Identical germline mutation (and RB tumor) was also noted in the twin. In each case, there was concordance between the assessed risk and manifestation of RB. Conclusion: Assessment of risk of RB in a twin presents with a unique challenge. Depending upon the genotype variant, the risk of developing RB can vary from 0% to 90%. In addition to family history, clinical manifestation in the proband, zygosity status, and RB1 germline status are critical in formulating risk-appropriate surveillance guidelines.
topic genetic testing
germline
mosaic
retinoblastoma
twins
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2021;volume=69;issue=5;spage=1230;epage=1233;aulast=Raval
work_keys_str_mv AT vishalraval retinoblastomaintwinsriskassessmentofgenotypicvariants
AT meghandebenedictis retinoblastomaintwinsriskassessmentofgenotypicvariants
AT randybowen retinoblastomaintwinsriskassessmentofgenotypicvariants
AT hansellsoto retinoblastomaintwinsriskassessmentofgenotypicvariants
AT jacquelyndavanzo retinoblastomaintwinsriskassessmentofgenotypicvariants
AT arunsingh retinoblastomaintwinsriskassessmentofgenotypicvariants
_version_ 1721464701840261120