Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Analysis of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a non-invasive method for studying the acidity (pH) of airway secretions in patients with inflammatory lung diseases.</p> <p>Aim</p> <p>To assess the reproducibil...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2009-08-01
|
Series: | Respiratory Research |
Online Access: | http://respiratory-research.com/content/10/1/78 |
id |
doaj-26dac928d4754831bc26b0da2dca7e6a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-26dac928d4754831bc26b0da2dca7e6a2020-11-24T22:58:49ZengBMCRespiratory Research1465-99212009-08-011017810.1186/1465-9921-10-78Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patientsVogelmeier ClausGauw Stefanie ABals RobertSchot RobertDragonieri SilvanoKoczulla RembertRabe Klaus FSterk Peter JHiemstra Pieter S<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Analysis of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a non-invasive method for studying the acidity (pH) of airway secretions in patients with inflammatory lung diseases.</p> <p>Aim</p> <p>To assess the reproducibility of EBC pH for two commercially available devices (portable RTube and non-portable ECoScreen) in healthy controls, patients with asthma or COPD, and subjects suffering from an acute cold with lower-airway symptoms. In addition, we assessed the repeatability in healthy controls.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>EBC was collected from 40 subjects (n = 10 in each of the above groups) using RTube and ECoScreen. EBC was collected from controls on two separate occasions within 5 days. pH in EBC was assessed after degasification with argon for 20 min.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In controls, pH-measurements in EBC collected by RTube or ECoScreen showed no significant difference between devices (p = 0.754) or between days (repeatability coefficient RTube: 0.47; ECoScreen: 0.42) of collection. A comparison between EBC pH collected by the two devices in asthma, COPD and cold patients also showed good reproducibility. No differences in pH values were observed between controls (mean pH 8.27; RTube) and patients with COPD (pH 7.97) or asthma (pH 8.20), but lower values were found using both devices in patients with a cold (pH 7.56; RTube, p < 0.01; ECoScreen, p < 0.05).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We conclude that pH measurements in EBC collected by RTube and ECoScreen are repeatable and reproducible in healthy controls, and are reproducible and comparable in healthy controls, COPD and asthma patients, and subjects with a common cold.</p> http://respiratory-research.com/content/10/1/78 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Vogelmeier Claus Gauw Stefanie A Bals Robert Schot Robert Dragonieri Silvano Koczulla Rembert Rabe Klaus F Sterk Peter J Hiemstra Pieter S |
spellingShingle |
Vogelmeier Claus Gauw Stefanie A Bals Robert Schot Robert Dragonieri Silvano Koczulla Rembert Rabe Klaus F Sterk Peter J Hiemstra Pieter S Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients Respiratory Research |
author_facet |
Vogelmeier Claus Gauw Stefanie A Bals Robert Schot Robert Dragonieri Silvano Koczulla Rembert Rabe Klaus F Sterk Peter J Hiemstra Pieter S |
author_sort |
Vogelmeier Claus |
title |
Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients |
title_short |
Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients |
title_full |
Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients |
title_sort |
comparison of exhaled breath condensate ph using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and copd patients |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Respiratory Research |
issn |
1465-9921 |
publishDate |
2009-08-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Analysis of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a non-invasive method for studying the acidity (pH) of airway secretions in patients with inflammatory lung diseases.</p> <p>Aim</p> <p>To assess the reproducibility of EBC pH for two commercially available devices (portable RTube and non-portable ECoScreen) in healthy controls, patients with asthma or COPD, and subjects suffering from an acute cold with lower-airway symptoms. In addition, we assessed the repeatability in healthy controls.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>EBC was collected from 40 subjects (n = 10 in each of the above groups) using RTube and ECoScreen. EBC was collected from controls on two separate occasions within 5 days. pH in EBC was assessed after degasification with argon for 20 min.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In controls, pH-measurements in EBC collected by RTube or ECoScreen showed no significant difference between devices (p = 0.754) or between days (repeatability coefficient RTube: 0.47; ECoScreen: 0.42) of collection. A comparison between EBC pH collected by the two devices in asthma, COPD and cold patients also showed good reproducibility. No differences in pH values were observed between controls (mean pH 8.27; RTube) and patients with COPD (pH 7.97) or asthma (pH 8.20), but lower values were found using both devices in patients with a cold (pH 7.56; RTube, p < 0.01; ECoScreen, p < 0.05).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We conclude that pH measurements in EBC collected by RTube and ECoScreen are repeatable and reproducible in healthy controls, and are reproducible and comparable in healthy controls, COPD and asthma patients, and subjects with a common cold.</p> |
url |
http://respiratory-research.com/content/10/1/78 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vogelmeierclaus comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients AT gauwstefaniea comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients AT balsrobert comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients AT schotrobert comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients AT dragonierisilvano comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients AT koczullarembert comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients AT rabeklausf comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients AT sterkpeterj comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients AT hiemstrapieters comparisonofexhaledbreathcondensatephusingtwocommerciallyavailabledevicesinhealthycontrolsasthmaandcopdpatients |
_version_ |
1725646327966072832 |