Dynamic Causal Models and Autopoietic Systems
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) and the theory of autopoietic systems are two important conceptual frameworks. In this review, we suggest that they can be combined to answer important questions about self-organising systems like the brain. DCM has been developed recently by the neuroimaging community...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2007-01-01
|
Series: | Biological Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-97602007000500010 |
id |
doaj-270e207a1c3449439fa374bc06ef52b2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-270e207a1c3449439fa374bc06ef52b22020-11-25T02:21:55ZengBMCBiological Research0716-97600717-62872007-01-01404487502Dynamic Causal Models and Autopoietic SystemsOLIVIER DAVIDDynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) and the theory of autopoietic systems are two important conceptual frameworks. In this review, we suggest that they can be combined to answer important questions about self-organising systems like the brain. DCM has been developed recently by the neuroimaging community to explain, using biophysical models, the non-invasive brain imaging data are caused by neural processes. It allows one to ask mechanistic questions about the implementation of cerebral processes. In DCM the parameters of biophysical models are estimated from measured data and the evidence for each model is evaluated. This enables one to test different functional hypotheses (i.e., models) for a given data set. Autopoiesis and related formal theories of biological systems as autonomous machines represent a body of concepts with many successful applications. However, autopoiesis has remained largely theoretical and has not penetrated the empiricism of cognitive neuroscience. In this review, we try to show the connections that exist between DCM and autopoiesis. In particular, we propose a simple modification to standard formulations of DCM that includes autonomous processes. The idea is to exploit the machinery of the system identification of DCMs in neuroimaging to test the face validity of the autopoietic theory applied to neural subsystems. We illustrate the theoretical concepts and their implications for interpreting electroencephalographic signals acquired during amygdala stimulation in an epileptic patient. The results suggest that DCM represents a relevant biophysical approach to brain functional organisation, with a potential that is yet to be fully evaluatedhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-97602007000500010Dynamic Causal Modellingbrain functional organizationplasticityautonomous systemsautopoiesis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
OLIVIER DAVID |
spellingShingle |
OLIVIER DAVID Dynamic Causal Models and Autopoietic Systems Biological Research Dynamic Causal Modelling brain functional organization plasticity autonomous systems autopoiesis |
author_facet |
OLIVIER DAVID |
author_sort |
OLIVIER DAVID |
title |
Dynamic Causal Models and Autopoietic Systems |
title_short |
Dynamic Causal Models and Autopoietic Systems |
title_full |
Dynamic Causal Models and Autopoietic Systems |
title_fullStr |
Dynamic Causal Models and Autopoietic Systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dynamic Causal Models and Autopoietic Systems |
title_sort |
dynamic causal models and autopoietic systems |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Biological Research |
issn |
0716-9760 0717-6287 |
publishDate |
2007-01-01 |
description |
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) and the theory of autopoietic systems are two important conceptual frameworks. In this review, we suggest that they can be combined to answer important questions about self-organising systems like the brain. DCM has been developed recently by the neuroimaging community to explain, using biophysical models, the non-invasive brain imaging data are caused by neural processes. It allows one to ask mechanistic questions about the implementation of cerebral processes. In DCM the parameters of biophysical models are estimated from measured data and the evidence for each model is evaluated. This enables one to test different functional hypotheses (i.e., models) for a given data set. Autopoiesis and related formal theories of biological systems as autonomous machines represent a body of concepts with many successful applications. However, autopoiesis has remained largely theoretical and has not penetrated the empiricism of cognitive neuroscience. In this review, we try to show the connections that exist between DCM and autopoiesis. In particular, we propose a simple modification to standard formulations of DCM that includes autonomous processes. The idea is to exploit the machinery of the system identification of DCMs in neuroimaging to test the face validity of the autopoietic theory applied to neural subsystems. We illustrate the theoretical concepts and their implications for interpreting electroencephalographic signals acquired during amygdala stimulation in an epileptic patient. The results suggest that DCM represents a relevant biophysical approach to brain functional organisation, with a potential that is yet to be fully evaluated |
topic |
Dynamic Causal Modelling brain functional organization plasticity autonomous systems autopoiesis |
url |
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-97602007000500010 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT olivierdavid dynamiccausalmodelsandautopoieticsystems |
_version_ |
1724864562464817152 |