Dynamic Causal Models and Autopoietic Systems

Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) and the theory of autopoietic systems are two important conceptual frameworks. In this review, we suggest that they can be combined to answer important questions about self-organising systems like the brain. DCM has been developed recently by the neuroimaging community...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: OLIVIER DAVID
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-01-01
Series:Biological Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-97602007000500010
id doaj-270e207a1c3449439fa374bc06ef52b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-270e207a1c3449439fa374bc06ef52b22020-11-25T02:21:55ZengBMCBiological Research0716-97600717-62872007-01-01404487502Dynamic Causal Models and Autopoietic SystemsOLIVIER DAVIDDynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) and the theory of autopoietic systems are two important conceptual frameworks. In this review, we suggest that they can be combined to answer important questions about self-organising systems like the brain. DCM has been developed recently by the neuroimaging community to explain, using biophysical models, the non-invasive brain imaging data are caused by neural processes. It allows one to ask mechanistic questions about the implementation of cerebral processes. In DCM the parameters of biophysical models are estimated from measured data and the evidence for each model is evaluated. This enables one to test different functional hypotheses (i.e., models) for a given data set. Autopoiesis and related formal theories of biological systems as autonomous machines represent a body of concepts with many successful applications. However, autopoiesis has remained largely theoretical and has not penetrated the empiricism of cognitive neuroscience. In this review, we try to show the connections that exist between DCM and autopoiesis. In particular, we propose a simple modification to standard formulations of DCM that includes autonomous processes. The idea is to exploit the machinery of the system identification of DCMs in neuroimaging to test the face validity of the autopoietic theory applied to neural subsystems. We illustrate the theoretical concepts and their implications for interpreting electroencephalographic signals acquired during amygdala stimulation in an epileptic patient. The results suggest that DCM represents a relevant biophysical approach to brain functional organisation, with a potential that is yet to be fully evaluatedhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-97602007000500010Dynamic Causal Modellingbrain functional organizationplasticityautonomous systemsautopoiesis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author OLIVIER DAVID
spellingShingle OLIVIER DAVID
Dynamic Causal Models and Autopoietic Systems
Biological Research
Dynamic Causal Modelling
brain functional organization
plasticity
autonomous systems
autopoiesis
author_facet OLIVIER DAVID
author_sort OLIVIER DAVID
title Dynamic Causal Models and Autopoietic Systems
title_short Dynamic Causal Models and Autopoietic Systems
title_full Dynamic Causal Models and Autopoietic Systems
title_fullStr Dynamic Causal Models and Autopoietic Systems
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Causal Models and Autopoietic Systems
title_sort dynamic causal models and autopoietic systems
publisher BMC
series Biological Research
issn 0716-9760
0717-6287
publishDate 2007-01-01
description Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) and the theory of autopoietic systems are two important conceptual frameworks. In this review, we suggest that they can be combined to answer important questions about self-organising systems like the brain. DCM has been developed recently by the neuroimaging community to explain, using biophysical models, the non-invasive brain imaging data are caused by neural processes. It allows one to ask mechanistic questions about the implementation of cerebral processes. In DCM the parameters of biophysical models are estimated from measured data and the evidence for each model is evaluated. This enables one to test different functional hypotheses (i.e., models) for a given data set. Autopoiesis and related formal theories of biological systems as autonomous machines represent a body of concepts with many successful applications. However, autopoiesis has remained largely theoretical and has not penetrated the empiricism of cognitive neuroscience. In this review, we try to show the connections that exist between DCM and autopoiesis. In particular, we propose a simple modification to standard formulations of DCM that includes autonomous processes. The idea is to exploit the machinery of the system identification of DCMs in neuroimaging to test the face validity of the autopoietic theory applied to neural subsystems. We illustrate the theoretical concepts and their implications for interpreting electroencephalographic signals acquired during amygdala stimulation in an epileptic patient. The results suggest that DCM represents a relevant biophysical approach to brain functional organisation, with a potential that is yet to be fully evaluated
topic Dynamic Causal Modelling
brain functional organization
plasticity
autonomous systems
autopoiesis
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-97602007000500010
work_keys_str_mv AT olivierdavid dynamiccausalmodelsandautopoieticsystems
_version_ 1724864562464817152