What is said, what is implicated, what is implicated
The present paper, which takes Bach’s (1994) distinction between ‘what is said’, ‘implicature’, and ‘impliciture’ as a starting point, shows that Grice’s tests of non-detachability and cancellability are able to clarify the distinction among different elements of utterance meaning that are pragmatic...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti
2008-01-01
|
Series: | Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://bwpl.unibuc.ro/index.pl/what_is_said_what_is_implicated_what_is_implicated |
id |
doaj-271590e78a15490c9f88069a21f25c28 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-271590e78a15490c9f88069a21f25c282020-11-24T22:29:00ZengEditura Universitatii din BucurestiBucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 2069-92392008-01-01X2131What is said, what is implicated, what is implicatedDiana IoniţăThe present paper, which takes Bach’s (1994) distinction between ‘what is said’, ‘implicature’, and ‘impliciture’ as a starting point, shows that Grice’s tests of non-detachability and cancellability are able to clarify the distinction among different elements of utterance meaning that are pragmatically determined. We establish that conversational implicature is cancellable and detachable.By using examples, we emphasize the difference between what is explicitly said and what goes implicit in what is said. http://bwpl.unibuc.ro/index.pl/what_is_said_what_is_implicated_what_is_implicatedimplicitureimplicaturecancellabilityexplicitimplicit |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Diana Ioniţă |
spellingShingle |
Diana Ioniţă What is said, what is implicated, what is implicated Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics impliciture implicature cancellability explicit implicit |
author_facet |
Diana Ioniţă |
author_sort |
Diana Ioniţă |
title |
What is said, what is implicated, what is implicated |
title_short |
What is said, what is implicated, what is implicated |
title_full |
What is said, what is implicated, what is implicated |
title_fullStr |
What is said, what is implicated, what is implicated |
title_full_unstemmed |
What is said, what is implicated, what is implicated |
title_sort |
what is said, what is implicated, what is implicated |
publisher |
Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti |
series |
Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics |
issn |
2069-9239 |
publishDate |
2008-01-01 |
description |
The present paper, which takes Bach’s (1994) distinction between ‘what is said’, ‘implicature’, and ‘impliciture’ as a starting point, shows that Grice’s tests of non-detachability and cancellability are able to clarify the distinction among different elements of utterance meaning that are pragmatically determined. We establish that conversational implicature is cancellable and detachable.By using examples, we emphasize the difference between what is explicitly said and what goes implicit in what is said. |
topic |
impliciture implicature cancellability explicit implicit |
url |
http://bwpl.unibuc.ro/index.pl/what_is_said_what_is_implicated_what_is_implicated |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dianaionita whatissaidwhatisimplicatedwhatisimplicated |
_version_ |
1725745312919715840 |