Cognitive Performance Following Ingestion of Glucose–Fructose Sweeteners That Impart Different Postprandial Glycaemic Responses: A Randomised Control Trial

We aimed to investigate the isolated effect of glycaemia on cognitive test performance by using beverages sweetened with two different glucose−fructose disaccharides, sucrose and isomaltulose. In a randomised crossover design, 70 healthy adults received a low-glycaemic-index (GI) isomaltul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Celeste Keesing, Brianna Mills, Charlene Rapsey, Jillian Haszard, Bernard Venn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-11-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/11/2647
id doaj-2716b2c265aa41fcaae90ccc24f74ddc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2716b2c265aa41fcaae90ccc24f74ddc2020-11-24T21:33:51ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432019-11-011111264710.3390/nu11112647nu11112647Cognitive Performance Following Ingestion of Glucose–Fructose Sweeteners That Impart Different Postprandial Glycaemic Responses: A Randomised Control TrialCeleste Keesing0Brianna Mills1Charlene Rapsey2Jillian Haszard3Bernard Venn4Department of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New ZealandWe aimed to investigate the isolated effect of glycaemia on cognitive test performance by using beverages sweetened with two different glucose&#8722;fructose disaccharides, sucrose and isomaltulose. In a randomised crossover design, 70 healthy adults received a low-glycaemic-index (GI) isomaltulose and sucralose beverage (GI 32) and a high-GI sucrose beverage (GI 65) on two occasions that were separated by two weeks. Following beverage ingestion, declarative memory and immediate word recall were examined at 30, 80 and 130 min. At 140 min, executive function was tested. To confirm that the glycaemic response of the test beverages matched published GI estimates, a subsample (<i>n</i> = 12) of the cognitive testing population (<i>n</i> = 70) underwent glycaemic response testing on different test days. A significantly lower value of mean (95% CI) blood glucose concentration incremental area under the curve (iAUC) was found for isomaltulose, in comparison to the blood glucose concentration iAUC value for sucrose, the difference corresponding to &#8722;44 mmol/L∙min (&#8722;70, &#8722;18), <i>p</i> = 0.003. The mean (95% CI) difference in numbers of correct answers or words recalled between beverages at 30, 80 and 130 min were 0.1 (&#8722;0.2, 0.5), &#8722;0.3 (&#8722;0.8, 0.2) and 0.0 (&#8722;0.5, 0.5) for declarative memory, and &#8722;0.5 (&#8722;1.4, 0.3), 0.4 (&#8722;0.4, 1.3) and &#8722;0.4 (&#8722;1.1, 0.4) for immediate free word recall. At 140 min, the mean difference in the trail-making test between beverages was &#8722;0.3 sec (&#8722;6.9, 6.3). None of these differences were statistically or clinically significant. In summary, cognitive performance was unaffected by different glycaemic responses to beverages during the postprandial period of 140 min.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/11/2647glucosefructosesucroseisomaltuloseglycaemiainsulinaemiacognition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Celeste Keesing
Brianna Mills
Charlene Rapsey
Jillian Haszard
Bernard Venn
spellingShingle Celeste Keesing
Brianna Mills
Charlene Rapsey
Jillian Haszard
Bernard Venn
Cognitive Performance Following Ingestion of Glucose–Fructose Sweeteners That Impart Different Postprandial Glycaemic Responses: A Randomised Control Trial
Nutrients
glucose
fructose
sucrose
isomaltulose
glycaemia
insulinaemia
cognition
author_facet Celeste Keesing
Brianna Mills
Charlene Rapsey
Jillian Haszard
Bernard Venn
author_sort Celeste Keesing
title Cognitive Performance Following Ingestion of Glucose–Fructose Sweeteners That Impart Different Postprandial Glycaemic Responses: A Randomised Control Trial
title_short Cognitive Performance Following Ingestion of Glucose–Fructose Sweeteners That Impart Different Postprandial Glycaemic Responses: A Randomised Control Trial
title_full Cognitive Performance Following Ingestion of Glucose–Fructose Sweeteners That Impart Different Postprandial Glycaemic Responses: A Randomised Control Trial
title_fullStr Cognitive Performance Following Ingestion of Glucose–Fructose Sweeteners That Impart Different Postprandial Glycaemic Responses: A Randomised Control Trial
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Performance Following Ingestion of Glucose–Fructose Sweeteners That Impart Different Postprandial Glycaemic Responses: A Randomised Control Trial
title_sort cognitive performance following ingestion of glucose–fructose sweeteners that impart different postprandial glycaemic responses: a randomised control trial
publisher MDPI AG
series Nutrients
issn 2072-6643
publishDate 2019-11-01
description We aimed to investigate the isolated effect of glycaemia on cognitive test performance by using beverages sweetened with two different glucose&#8722;fructose disaccharides, sucrose and isomaltulose. In a randomised crossover design, 70 healthy adults received a low-glycaemic-index (GI) isomaltulose and sucralose beverage (GI 32) and a high-GI sucrose beverage (GI 65) on two occasions that were separated by two weeks. Following beverage ingestion, declarative memory and immediate word recall were examined at 30, 80 and 130 min. At 140 min, executive function was tested. To confirm that the glycaemic response of the test beverages matched published GI estimates, a subsample (<i>n</i> = 12) of the cognitive testing population (<i>n</i> = 70) underwent glycaemic response testing on different test days. A significantly lower value of mean (95% CI) blood glucose concentration incremental area under the curve (iAUC) was found for isomaltulose, in comparison to the blood glucose concentration iAUC value for sucrose, the difference corresponding to &#8722;44 mmol/L∙min (&#8722;70, &#8722;18), <i>p</i> = 0.003. The mean (95% CI) difference in numbers of correct answers or words recalled between beverages at 30, 80 and 130 min were 0.1 (&#8722;0.2, 0.5), &#8722;0.3 (&#8722;0.8, 0.2) and 0.0 (&#8722;0.5, 0.5) for declarative memory, and &#8722;0.5 (&#8722;1.4, 0.3), 0.4 (&#8722;0.4, 1.3) and &#8722;0.4 (&#8722;1.1, 0.4) for immediate free word recall. At 140 min, the mean difference in the trail-making test between beverages was &#8722;0.3 sec (&#8722;6.9, 6.3). None of these differences were statistically or clinically significant. In summary, cognitive performance was unaffected by different glycaemic responses to beverages during the postprandial period of 140 min.
topic glucose
fructose
sucrose
isomaltulose
glycaemia
insulinaemia
cognition
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/11/2647
work_keys_str_mv AT celestekeesing cognitiveperformancefollowingingestionofglucosefructosesweetenersthatimpartdifferentpostprandialglycaemicresponsesarandomisedcontroltrial
AT briannamills cognitiveperformancefollowingingestionofglucosefructosesweetenersthatimpartdifferentpostprandialglycaemicresponsesarandomisedcontroltrial
AT charlenerapsey cognitiveperformancefollowingingestionofglucosefructosesweetenersthatimpartdifferentpostprandialglycaemicresponsesarandomisedcontroltrial
AT jillianhaszard cognitiveperformancefollowingingestionofglucosefructosesweetenersthatimpartdifferentpostprandialglycaemicresponsesarandomisedcontroltrial
AT bernardvenn cognitiveperformancefollowingingestionofglucosefructosesweetenersthatimpartdifferentpostprandialglycaemicresponsesarandomisedcontroltrial
_version_ 1725951638453092352