Molecular Signature of Cancer at Gene Level or Pathway Level? Case Studies of Colorectal Cancer and Prostate Cancer Microarray Data

With recent advances in microarray technology, there has been a flourish in genome-scale identification of molecular signatures for cancer. However, the differentially expressed genes obtained by different laboratories are highly divergent. The present discrepancy at gene level indicates a need for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiajia Chen, Ying Wang, Bairong Shen, Daqing Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/909525
id doaj-2740bad53098438fbba37d4b1f6a9629
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2740bad53098438fbba37d4b1f6a96292020-11-25T00:56:34ZengHindawi LimitedComputational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine1748-670X1748-67182013-01-01201310.1155/2013/909525909525Molecular Signature of Cancer at Gene Level or Pathway Level? Case Studies of Colorectal Cancer and Prostate Cancer Microarray DataJiajia Chen0Ying Wang1Bairong Shen2Daqing Zhang3Center for Systems Biology, Soochow University, Jiangsu, Suzhou 215006, ChinaCenter for Systems Biology, Soochow University, Jiangsu, Suzhou 215006, ChinaCenter for Systems Biology, Soochow University, Jiangsu, Suzhou 215006, ChinaCenter for Systems Biology, Soochow University, Jiangsu, Suzhou 215006, ChinaWith recent advances in microarray technology, there has been a flourish in genome-scale identification of molecular signatures for cancer. However, the differentially expressed genes obtained by different laboratories are highly divergent. The present discrepancy at gene level indicates a need for a novel strategy to obtain more robust signatures for cancer. In this paper we hypothesize that (1) the expression signatures of different cancer microarray datasets are more similar at pathway level than at gene level; (2) the comparability of the cancer molecular mechanisms of different individuals is related to their genetic similarities. In support of the hypotheses, we summarized theoretical and experimental evidences, and conducted case studies on colorectal and prostate cancer microarray datasets. Based on the above assumption, we propose that reliable cancer signatures should be investigated in the context of biological pathways, within a cohort of genetically homogeneous population. It is hoped that the hypotheses can guide future research in cancer mechanism and signature discovery.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/909525
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jiajia Chen
Ying Wang
Bairong Shen
Daqing Zhang
spellingShingle Jiajia Chen
Ying Wang
Bairong Shen
Daqing Zhang
Molecular Signature of Cancer at Gene Level or Pathway Level? Case Studies of Colorectal Cancer and Prostate Cancer Microarray Data
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
author_facet Jiajia Chen
Ying Wang
Bairong Shen
Daqing Zhang
author_sort Jiajia Chen
title Molecular Signature of Cancer at Gene Level or Pathway Level? Case Studies of Colorectal Cancer and Prostate Cancer Microarray Data
title_short Molecular Signature of Cancer at Gene Level or Pathway Level? Case Studies of Colorectal Cancer and Prostate Cancer Microarray Data
title_full Molecular Signature of Cancer at Gene Level or Pathway Level? Case Studies of Colorectal Cancer and Prostate Cancer Microarray Data
title_fullStr Molecular Signature of Cancer at Gene Level or Pathway Level? Case Studies of Colorectal Cancer and Prostate Cancer Microarray Data
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Signature of Cancer at Gene Level or Pathway Level? Case Studies of Colorectal Cancer and Prostate Cancer Microarray Data
title_sort molecular signature of cancer at gene level or pathway level? case studies of colorectal cancer and prostate cancer microarray data
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
issn 1748-670X
1748-6718
publishDate 2013-01-01
description With recent advances in microarray technology, there has been a flourish in genome-scale identification of molecular signatures for cancer. However, the differentially expressed genes obtained by different laboratories are highly divergent. The present discrepancy at gene level indicates a need for a novel strategy to obtain more robust signatures for cancer. In this paper we hypothesize that (1) the expression signatures of different cancer microarray datasets are more similar at pathway level than at gene level; (2) the comparability of the cancer molecular mechanisms of different individuals is related to their genetic similarities. In support of the hypotheses, we summarized theoretical and experimental evidences, and conducted case studies on colorectal and prostate cancer microarray datasets. Based on the above assumption, we propose that reliable cancer signatures should be investigated in the context of biological pathways, within a cohort of genetically homogeneous population. It is hoped that the hypotheses can guide future research in cancer mechanism and signature discovery.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/909525
work_keys_str_mv AT jiajiachen molecularsignatureofcanceratgenelevelorpathwaylevelcasestudiesofcolorectalcancerandprostatecancermicroarraydata
AT yingwang molecularsignatureofcanceratgenelevelorpathwaylevelcasestudiesofcolorectalcancerandprostatecancermicroarraydata
AT bairongshen molecularsignatureofcanceratgenelevelorpathwaylevelcasestudiesofcolorectalcancerandprostatecancermicroarraydata
AT daqingzhang molecularsignatureofcanceratgenelevelorpathwaylevelcasestudiesofcolorectalcancerandprostatecancermicroarraydata
_version_ 1725226611971719168