Open-label randomized controlled study comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus dose of atropine with or without pralidoxime in the treatment of organophosphorus poisoning in a teaching hospital

Background: Severe organophosphorus (OPC) poisoning is one of the serious problems in developing world, taking great toll on life. Though Atropine is used as an antidote, there are no clear guidelines. We conducted an open label randomized controlled clinical study to compare the efficacy of continu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R C Kumaraswamy, K M Sudha Madhavi, S P Basavanthappa, M R Nagendra Gowda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:Sahel Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.smjonline.org/article.asp?issn=1118-8561;year=2014;volume=17;issue=3;spage=87;epage=90;aulast=Kumaraswamy
id doaj-27830623eb5a4ffb8efb6d0cf6c21dd2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-27830623eb5a4ffb8efb6d0cf6c21dd22020-11-24T23:28:05ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSahel Medical Journal2321-66892014-01-01173879010.4103/1118-8561.140287Open-label randomized controlled study comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus dose of atropine with or without pralidoxime in the treatment of organophosphorus poisoning in a teaching hospitalR C KumaraswamyK M Sudha MadhaviS P BasavanthappaM R Nagendra GowdaBackground: Severe organophosphorus (OPC) poisoning is one of the serious problems in developing world, taking great toll on life. Though Atropine is used as an antidote, there are no clear guidelines. We conducted an open label randomized controlled clinical study to compare the efficacy of continuous infusion of atropine to that of intermittent bolus dose in the treatment of OPC poisoning. Methods and Material: Patients aged above 12 years with clinical evidence of OPC poisoning were studied. Both the groups received initial bolus of 1to3 mg of atropine. Then, Group-A received intermittent bolus and group-B, continuous infusion, until adequately atropinized. Results: Out of 743 patients (group-A: 356 and group-B: 387), females were 54%. 83% had suicidal intent. Mean atropine dose was 126.6mg in group-A and 78mg in group-B (P < 0.0001) . 21.07% (group-A) and 12.92% (group-B) developed intermediate syndrome (P = 0.003) , mortality was 27.25%(97) in group-A v/s 13%(50) in group-B (P < 0.0001) . Ventilator support needed in 36%(group-A) against 17% in group-B (P < 0.0001) and duration of ventilation was 1.5 days lesser in group B (P < 0.0001) . 23.03% had atropine toxicity in group-A as compared to 8% in group-B (P < 0.0001) . Hospital stay was 1.67 (P < 0.0001) days shorter for group-B. Conclusion: Continuous atropine infusion should be standard of care in treating OPC poisoning.http://www.smjonline.org/article.asp?issn=1118-8561;year=2014;volume=17;issue=3;spage=87;epage=90;aulast=KumaraswamyAtropinecontinuous versus intermittentorganophosphoruspoisoning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R C Kumaraswamy
K M Sudha Madhavi
S P Basavanthappa
M R Nagendra Gowda
spellingShingle R C Kumaraswamy
K M Sudha Madhavi
S P Basavanthappa
M R Nagendra Gowda
Open-label randomized controlled study comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus dose of atropine with or without pralidoxime in the treatment of organophosphorus poisoning in a teaching hospital
Sahel Medical Journal
Atropine
continuous versus intermittent
organophosphorus
poisoning
author_facet R C Kumaraswamy
K M Sudha Madhavi
S P Basavanthappa
M R Nagendra Gowda
author_sort R C Kumaraswamy
title Open-label randomized controlled study comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus dose of atropine with or without pralidoxime in the treatment of organophosphorus poisoning in a teaching hospital
title_short Open-label randomized controlled study comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus dose of atropine with or without pralidoxime in the treatment of organophosphorus poisoning in a teaching hospital
title_full Open-label randomized controlled study comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus dose of atropine with or without pralidoxime in the treatment of organophosphorus poisoning in a teaching hospital
title_fullStr Open-label randomized controlled study comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus dose of atropine with or without pralidoxime in the treatment of organophosphorus poisoning in a teaching hospital
title_full_unstemmed Open-label randomized controlled study comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus dose of atropine with or without pralidoxime in the treatment of organophosphorus poisoning in a teaching hospital
title_sort open-label randomized controlled study comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus dose of atropine with or without pralidoxime in the treatment of organophosphorus poisoning in a teaching hospital
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Sahel Medical Journal
issn 2321-6689
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Background: Severe organophosphorus (OPC) poisoning is one of the serious problems in developing world, taking great toll on life. Though Atropine is used as an antidote, there are no clear guidelines. We conducted an open label randomized controlled clinical study to compare the efficacy of continuous infusion of atropine to that of intermittent bolus dose in the treatment of OPC poisoning. Methods and Material: Patients aged above 12 years with clinical evidence of OPC poisoning were studied. Both the groups received initial bolus of 1to3 mg of atropine. Then, Group-A received intermittent bolus and group-B, continuous infusion, until adequately atropinized. Results: Out of 743 patients (group-A: 356 and group-B: 387), females were 54%. 83% had suicidal intent. Mean atropine dose was 126.6mg in group-A and 78mg in group-B (P < 0.0001) . 21.07% (group-A) and 12.92% (group-B) developed intermediate syndrome (P = 0.003) , mortality was 27.25%(97) in group-A v/s 13%(50) in group-B (P < 0.0001) . Ventilator support needed in 36%(group-A) against 17% in group-B (P < 0.0001) and duration of ventilation was 1.5 days lesser in group B (P < 0.0001) . 23.03% had atropine toxicity in group-A as compared to 8% in group-B (P < 0.0001) . Hospital stay was 1.67 (P < 0.0001) days shorter for group-B. Conclusion: Continuous atropine infusion should be standard of care in treating OPC poisoning.
topic Atropine
continuous versus intermittent
organophosphorus
poisoning
url http://www.smjonline.org/article.asp?issn=1118-8561;year=2014;volume=17;issue=3;spage=87;epage=90;aulast=Kumaraswamy
work_keys_str_mv AT rckumaraswamy openlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingcontinuousinfusionversusintermittentbolusdoseofatropinewithorwithoutpralidoximeinthetreatmentoforganophosphoruspoisoninginateachinghospital
AT kmsudhamadhavi openlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingcontinuousinfusionversusintermittentbolusdoseofatropinewithorwithoutpralidoximeinthetreatmentoforganophosphoruspoisoninginateachinghospital
AT spbasavanthappa openlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingcontinuousinfusionversusintermittentbolusdoseofatropinewithorwithoutpralidoximeinthetreatmentoforganophosphoruspoisoninginateachinghospital
AT mrnagendragowda openlabelrandomizedcontrolledstudycomparingcontinuousinfusionversusintermittentbolusdoseofatropinewithorwithoutpralidoximeinthetreatmentoforganophosphoruspoisoninginateachinghospital
_version_ 1725550839284629504