A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience

Abstract Background Optimal cytoreduction (macroscopic Residual Tumor, RT = 0) is the best survival predictor factor in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). It doesn’t exist a consolidated criteria to predict optimal surgical resection at interval debulking surgery (IDS). The aim of this study is to dev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eleonora Ghisoni, Dionyssios Katsaros, Furio Maggiorotto, Massimo Aglietta, Marco Vaira, Michele De Simone, Gloria Mittica, Gaia Giannone, Manuela Robella, Sofia Genta, Fabiola Lucchino, Francesco Marocco, Fulvio Borella, Giorgio Valabrega, Riccardo Ponzone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-05-01
Series:Journal of Ovarian Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13048-018-0415-y
id doaj-27c694ec78e94f578a25914277c40772
record_format Article
spelling doaj-27c694ec78e94f578a25914277c407722020-11-24T22:17:21ZengBMCJournal of Ovarian Research1757-22152018-05-011111710.1186/s13048-018-0415-yA predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experienceEleonora Ghisoni0Dionyssios Katsaros1Furio Maggiorotto2Massimo Aglietta3Marco Vaira4Michele De Simone5Gloria Mittica6Gaia Giannone7Manuela Robella8Sofia Genta9Fabiola Lucchino10Francesco Marocco11Fulvio Borella12Giorgio Valabrega13Riccardo Ponzone14Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCSDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Gynecology, AOU, Città della Salute e della ScienzaCandiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCSCandiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCSCandiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCSCandiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCSCandiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCSCandiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCSCandiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCSCandiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCSDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Gynecology, AOU, Città della Salute e della ScienzaCandiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCSDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Gynecology, AOU, Città della Salute e della ScienzaCandiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCSCandiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCSAbstract Background Optimal cytoreduction (macroscopic Residual Tumor, RT = 0) is the best survival predictor factor in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). It doesn’t exist a consolidated criteria to predict optimal surgical resection at interval debulking surgery (IDS). The aim of this study is to develop a predictive model of complete cytoreduction at IDS. Methods We, retrospectively, analyzed 93 out of 432 patients, with advanced EOC, underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and IDS from January 2010 to December 2016 in two referral cancer centers. The correlation between clinical-pathological variables and residual disease at IDS has been investigated with univariate and multivariate analysis. A predictive score of cytoreduction (PSC) has been created by combining all significant variables. The performance of each single variable and PSC has been reported and the correlation of all significant variables with progression free survival (PFS) has been assessed. Results At IDS, 65 patients (69,8%) had complete cytoreduction with no residual disease (R = 0). Three criteria independently predicted R > 0: age ≥ 60 years (p = 0.014), CA-125 before NACT > 550 UI/dl (p = 0.044), and Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) > 16 (p < 0.001). A PSC ≥ 3 has been associated with a better accuracy (85,8%), limiting the number of incomplete surgeries to 16,5%. Moreover, a PCI > 16, a PSC ≥ 3 and the presence of R > 0 after IDS were all significantly associated with shorter PFS (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.004 respectively). Conclusions Our PSC predicts, in a large number of patients, complete cytoreduction at IDS, limiting the rate of futile extensive surgeries in case of presence of residual tumor (R > 0). The PSC should be prospectively validated in a larger series of EOC patients undergoing NACT-IDS.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13048-018-0415-yOvarian cancerInterval debulking surgeryOptimal cytoreductionPredictive scorePeritoneal cancer index
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eleonora Ghisoni
Dionyssios Katsaros
Furio Maggiorotto
Massimo Aglietta
Marco Vaira
Michele De Simone
Gloria Mittica
Gaia Giannone
Manuela Robella
Sofia Genta
Fabiola Lucchino
Francesco Marocco
Fulvio Borella
Giorgio Valabrega
Riccardo Ponzone
spellingShingle Eleonora Ghisoni
Dionyssios Katsaros
Furio Maggiorotto
Massimo Aglietta
Marco Vaira
Michele De Simone
Gloria Mittica
Gaia Giannone
Manuela Robella
Sofia Genta
Fabiola Lucchino
Francesco Marocco
Fulvio Borella
Giorgio Valabrega
Riccardo Ponzone
A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience
Journal of Ovarian Research
Ovarian cancer
Interval debulking surgery
Optimal cytoreduction
Predictive score
Peritoneal cancer index
author_facet Eleonora Ghisoni
Dionyssios Katsaros
Furio Maggiorotto
Massimo Aglietta
Marco Vaira
Michele De Simone
Gloria Mittica
Gaia Giannone
Manuela Robella
Sofia Genta
Fabiola Lucchino
Francesco Marocco
Fulvio Borella
Giorgio Valabrega
Riccardo Ponzone
author_sort Eleonora Ghisoni
title A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience
title_short A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience
title_full A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience
title_fullStr A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience
title_full_unstemmed A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience
title_sort predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience
publisher BMC
series Journal of Ovarian Research
issn 1757-2215
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Abstract Background Optimal cytoreduction (macroscopic Residual Tumor, RT = 0) is the best survival predictor factor in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). It doesn’t exist a consolidated criteria to predict optimal surgical resection at interval debulking surgery (IDS). The aim of this study is to develop a predictive model of complete cytoreduction at IDS. Methods We, retrospectively, analyzed 93 out of 432 patients, with advanced EOC, underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and IDS from January 2010 to December 2016 in two referral cancer centers. The correlation between clinical-pathological variables and residual disease at IDS has been investigated with univariate and multivariate analysis. A predictive score of cytoreduction (PSC) has been created by combining all significant variables. The performance of each single variable and PSC has been reported and the correlation of all significant variables with progression free survival (PFS) has been assessed. Results At IDS, 65 patients (69,8%) had complete cytoreduction with no residual disease (R = 0). Three criteria independently predicted R > 0: age ≥ 60 years (p = 0.014), CA-125 before NACT > 550 UI/dl (p = 0.044), and Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) > 16 (p < 0.001). A PSC ≥ 3 has been associated with a better accuracy (85,8%), limiting the number of incomplete surgeries to 16,5%. Moreover, a PCI > 16, a PSC ≥ 3 and the presence of R > 0 after IDS were all significantly associated with shorter PFS (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.004 respectively). Conclusions Our PSC predicts, in a large number of patients, complete cytoreduction at IDS, limiting the rate of futile extensive surgeries in case of presence of residual tumor (R > 0). The PSC should be prospectively validated in a larger series of EOC patients undergoing NACT-IDS.
topic Ovarian cancer
Interval debulking surgery
Optimal cytoreduction
Predictive score
Peritoneal cancer index
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13048-018-0415-y
work_keys_str_mv AT eleonoraghisoni apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT dionyssioskatsaros apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT furiomaggiorotto apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT massimoaglietta apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT marcovaira apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT micheledesimone apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT gloriamittica apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT gaiagiannone apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT manuelarobella apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT sofiagenta apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT fabiolalucchino apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT francescomarocco apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT fulvioborella apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT giorgiovalabrega apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT riccardoponzone apredictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT eleonoraghisoni predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT dionyssioskatsaros predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT furiomaggiorotto predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT massimoaglietta predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT marcovaira predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT micheledesimone predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT gloriamittica predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT gaiagiannone predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT manuelarobella predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT sofiagenta predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT fabiolalucchino predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT francescomarocco predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT fulvioborella predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT giorgiovalabrega predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
AT riccardoponzone predictivescoreforoptimalcytoreductionatintervaldebulkingsurgeryinepithelialovariancanceratwocentersexperience
_version_ 1725785264167583744