Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition

Participants in the cognitive phenomenology debate have proceeded by (a) proposing a bifurcation of theoretical options into inflationary and non-inflationary theories, and then (b) providing arguments for/against one of these theories. I suggest that this method has failed to illuminate the common...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Philip Woodward
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2017-01-01
Series:Phenomenology and Mind
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7234
id doaj-27da92fb834344aa98b4c77e1d43f06b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-27da92fb834344aa98b4c77e1d43f06b2020-11-25T02:47:40ZengFirenze University PressPhenomenology and Mind2280-78532239-40282017-01-011010.13128/Phe_Mi-2009716857Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and CognitionPhilip Woodward Participants in the cognitive phenomenology debate have proceeded by (a) proposing a bifurcation of theoretical options into inflationary and non-inflationary theories, and then (b) providing arguments for/against one of these theories. I suggest that this method has failed to illuminate the commonalities and differences among conscious intentional states of different types, in the absence of a theory of the structure of these states. I propose such a theory. In perception, phenomenal-intentional properties combine with somatosensory properties to form P-I property clusters that serve as phenomenal modes of presentations of particulars. In imagination, somatosensory properties are replaced with phenomenal-intentional properties whose intentional objects are somatosensory properties, thus resulting in imaginative facsimiles of perceptual P-I property clusters. Such structures can then be used as phenomenal prototypes that pick out individuals and kinds. Sets of such prototypes constitute a subject’s conception of individuals and kinds. Combined with a few additional elements, these imaginative P-I property clusters serve as the building-blocks of conscious cognitive states. Different ways of carving up theoretical space classify my theory either as inflationary or as non-inflationary. I conclude that the theory is anti-inflationary in letter but inflationary in spirit. https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7234cognitive phenomenologyphenomenal intentionalityperceptionimagination
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Philip Woodward
spellingShingle Philip Woodward
Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition
Phenomenology and Mind
cognitive phenomenology
phenomenal intentionality
perception
imagination
author_facet Philip Woodward
author_sort Philip Woodward
title Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition
title_short Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition
title_full Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition
title_fullStr Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition
title_full_unstemmed Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition
title_sort conscious intentionality in perception, imagination, and cognition
publisher Firenze University Press
series Phenomenology and Mind
issn 2280-7853
2239-4028
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Participants in the cognitive phenomenology debate have proceeded by (a) proposing a bifurcation of theoretical options into inflationary and non-inflationary theories, and then (b) providing arguments for/against one of these theories. I suggest that this method has failed to illuminate the commonalities and differences among conscious intentional states of different types, in the absence of a theory of the structure of these states. I propose such a theory. In perception, phenomenal-intentional properties combine with somatosensory properties to form P-I property clusters that serve as phenomenal modes of presentations of particulars. In imagination, somatosensory properties are replaced with phenomenal-intentional properties whose intentional objects are somatosensory properties, thus resulting in imaginative facsimiles of perceptual P-I property clusters. Such structures can then be used as phenomenal prototypes that pick out individuals and kinds. Sets of such prototypes constitute a subject’s conception of individuals and kinds. Combined with a few additional elements, these imaginative P-I property clusters serve as the building-blocks of conscious cognitive states. Different ways of carving up theoretical space classify my theory either as inflationary or as non-inflationary. I conclude that the theory is anti-inflationary in letter but inflationary in spirit.
topic cognitive phenomenology
phenomenal intentionality
perception
imagination
url https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7234
work_keys_str_mv AT philipwoodward consciousintentionalityinperceptionimaginationandcognition
_version_ 1724752176493887488