Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research

We present a critical review of the literature on Melodic intonation therapy (MIT), one of the most formalized treatments used by speech-language therapist in Broca’s aphasia. We suggest basic clarifications to enhance the scientific support of this promising treatment. First, MIT is a program, not...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna eZumbansen, Isabelle ePeretz, Sylvie eHébert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fneur.2014.00007/full
id doaj-27e011cde19141f5ad2c3793e8d62213
record_format Article
spelling doaj-27e011cde19141f5ad2c3793e8d622132020-11-24T22:15:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952014-01-01510.3389/fneur.2014.0000772474Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future ResearchAnna eZumbansen0Anna eZumbansen1Isabelle ePeretz2Isabelle ePeretz3Sylvie eHébert4Sylvie eHébert5Université de MontréalBRAMS, International laboratory for Research on Brain, Music, and SoundUniversité de MontréalBRAMS, International laboratory for Research on Brain, Music, and SoundUniversité de MontréalBRAMS, International laboratory for Research on Brain, Music, and SoundWe present a critical review of the literature on Melodic intonation therapy (MIT), one of the most formalized treatments used by speech-language therapist in Broca’s aphasia. We suggest basic clarifications to enhance the scientific support of this promising treatment. First, MIT is a program, not a single speech facilitation technique. The goal of MIT is to restore propositional speech. The rational is that patients can learn a new way to speak through singing by using language-capable regions of the right cerebral hemisphere. We argue that many treatment programs covered in systematic reviews on MIT’s efficacy do not match MIT’s therapeutic goal and rationale. Second, we distinguish between the immediate effect of MIT’s main speech facilitation technique (i.e., intoned-speech) and the effect of the entire program on language recovery. Many results in the MIT literature can be explained by this duration factor. Finally, we propose that MIT can be viewed as a treatment of apraxia of speech more than aphasia. This issue should be explored in future experimental studies.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fneur.2014.00007/fullAphasiaMusic TherapyRehabilitationSpeech DisordersSpeech TherapyTreatment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna eZumbansen
Anna eZumbansen
Isabelle ePeretz
Isabelle ePeretz
Sylvie eHébert
Sylvie eHébert
spellingShingle Anna eZumbansen
Anna eZumbansen
Isabelle ePeretz
Isabelle ePeretz
Sylvie eHébert
Sylvie eHébert
Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research
Frontiers in Neurology
Aphasia
Music Therapy
Rehabilitation
Speech Disorders
Speech Therapy
Treatment
author_facet Anna eZumbansen
Anna eZumbansen
Isabelle ePeretz
Isabelle ePeretz
Sylvie eHébert
Sylvie eHébert
author_sort Anna eZumbansen
title Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research
title_short Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research
title_full Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research
title_fullStr Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research
title_full_unstemmed Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research
title_sort melodic intonation therapy: back to basics for future research
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neurology
issn 1664-2295
publishDate 2014-01-01
description We present a critical review of the literature on Melodic intonation therapy (MIT), one of the most formalized treatments used by speech-language therapist in Broca’s aphasia. We suggest basic clarifications to enhance the scientific support of this promising treatment. First, MIT is a program, not a single speech facilitation technique. The goal of MIT is to restore propositional speech. The rational is that patients can learn a new way to speak through singing by using language-capable regions of the right cerebral hemisphere. We argue that many treatment programs covered in systematic reviews on MIT’s efficacy do not match MIT’s therapeutic goal and rationale. Second, we distinguish between the immediate effect of MIT’s main speech facilitation technique (i.e., intoned-speech) and the effect of the entire program on language recovery. Many results in the MIT literature can be explained by this duration factor. Finally, we propose that MIT can be viewed as a treatment of apraxia of speech more than aphasia. This issue should be explored in future experimental studies.
topic Aphasia
Music Therapy
Rehabilitation
Speech Disorders
Speech Therapy
Treatment
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fneur.2014.00007/full
work_keys_str_mv AT annaezumbansen melodicintonationtherapybacktobasicsforfutureresearch
AT annaezumbansen melodicintonationtherapybacktobasicsforfutureresearch
AT isabelleeperetz melodicintonationtherapybacktobasicsforfutureresearch
AT isabelleeperetz melodicintonationtherapybacktobasicsforfutureresearch
AT sylvieehebert melodicintonationtherapybacktobasicsforfutureresearch
AT sylvieehebert melodicintonationtherapybacktobasicsforfutureresearch
_version_ 1725791891125960704