Social Agencies for Children and Families as Street Level Bureaucracies. A Case Study.

Social workers in public welfare services can be considered, according to Michael Lipsky theorization, street level bureaucrats. Lipsky (1980) defines as street level bureaucrats all public service workers who interact directly with citizens and have substantial discretion in the execution of their...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fabio Cappello
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Social Work & Society 2011-10-01
Series:Social Work and Society
Online Access:https://ejournals.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/sws/article/view/280
id doaj-27e45d927f58432fb385c3d83c096930
record_format Article
spelling doaj-27e45d927f58432fb385c3d83c0969302021-05-29T05:42:42ZengSocial Work & SocietySocial Work and Society1613-89532011-10-0192Social Agencies for Children and Families as Street Level Bureaucracies. A Case Study.Fabio Cappello0University of TrentoSocial workers in public welfare services can be considered, according to Michael Lipsky theorization, street level bureaucrats. Lipsky (1980) defines as street level bureaucrats all public service workers who interact directly with citizens and have substantial discretion in the execution of their work. They are professionals who grant access to State programs and provide services within these programs; but they also operate in an environment where resources are chronically inadequate to the task they are asked to perform, where goals expectations tend to be ambiguous, conflicting or vague and where the demand for services tends to increase constantly to meet the supply. The working conditions of street level bureaucrats are unavoidably uncertain: they are regularly confronted with dilemmas that are not just ethical but also organizational. Due to this situation, discretion represents for them, simultaneously, a crucial tool to work with in very complicated situations - where the human dimension is essential - and an important option in order to solve or simplify the mentioned organizational contradictions. In the first case discretion may be synonymous of professional autonomy; in the second it may represent a strategy to cope with uncertainties and work pressures, often through the rationing of services (which may even mean autonomous reduction of the level of services). https://ejournals.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/sws/article/view/280
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fabio Cappello
spellingShingle Fabio Cappello
Social Agencies for Children and Families as Street Level Bureaucracies. A Case Study.
Social Work and Society
author_facet Fabio Cappello
author_sort Fabio Cappello
title Social Agencies for Children and Families as Street Level Bureaucracies. A Case Study.
title_short Social Agencies for Children and Families as Street Level Bureaucracies. A Case Study.
title_full Social Agencies for Children and Families as Street Level Bureaucracies. A Case Study.
title_fullStr Social Agencies for Children and Families as Street Level Bureaucracies. A Case Study.
title_full_unstemmed Social Agencies for Children and Families as Street Level Bureaucracies. A Case Study.
title_sort social agencies for children and families as street level bureaucracies. a case study.
publisher Social Work & Society
series Social Work and Society
issn 1613-8953
publishDate 2011-10-01
description Social workers in public welfare services can be considered, according to Michael Lipsky theorization, street level bureaucrats. Lipsky (1980) defines as street level bureaucrats all public service workers who interact directly with citizens and have substantial discretion in the execution of their work. They are professionals who grant access to State programs and provide services within these programs; but they also operate in an environment where resources are chronically inadequate to the task they are asked to perform, where goals expectations tend to be ambiguous, conflicting or vague and where the demand for services tends to increase constantly to meet the supply. The working conditions of street level bureaucrats are unavoidably uncertain: they are regularly confronted with dilemmas that are not just ethical but also organizational. Due to this situation, discretion represents for them, simultaneously, a crucial tool to work with in very complicated situations - where the human dimension is essential - and an important option in order to solve or simplify the mentioned organizational contradictions. In the first case discretion may be synonymous of professional autonomy; in the second it may represent a strategy to cope with uncertainties and work pressures, often through the rationing of services (which may even mean autonomous reduction of the level of services).
url https://ejournals.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/sws/article/view/280
work_keys_str_mv AT fabiocappello socialagenciesforchildrenandfamiliesasstreetlevelbureaucraciesacasestudy
_version_ 1721422433286619136