Public Participation: Methods Matter; A Response to Boaz et al.
The commentary on our paper from Boaz et al. is both welcome and pertinent, especially in its call for greater critical attention to be paid to some of the underlying principles of participation as well as to techniques and methods (1,2). In some respects our paper and subsequent research was design...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2014-11-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ijhpm.com/pdf_2904_a6c5c3d976406984793bf0afc1a512db.html |
| id |
doaj-283adf1eed1d46a1abced46d4a354c2d |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-283adf1eed1d46a1abced46d4a354c2d2020-11-24T23:55:51ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management2322-59392322-59392014-11-013635535510.15171/ijhpm.2014.108Public Participation: Methods Matter; A Response to Boaz et al.Paul Burton0Jennifer A Whitty1Elizabeth Kendall2Julie Ratcliffe3Andrew Wilson4Peter Littlejohns5Paul A Scuffham6Urban Research Program, Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland, AustraliaSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaGriffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Logan Campus, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Queensland, AustraliaFlinders Health Economics Group, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, AustraliaMenzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaDivision of Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, UKGriffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Logan Campus, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Queensland, AustraliaThe commentary on our paper from Boaz et al. is both welcome and pertinent, especially in its call for greater critical attention to be paid to some of the underlying principles of participation as well as to techniques and methods (1,2). In some respects our paper and subsequent research was designed to allow us to measure and better understand the impact of participating in a citizen’s jury on the jurors’ views and expressed preferences (1,3).http://www.ijhpm.com/pdf_2904_a6c5c3d976406984793bf0afc1a512db.htmlPublic ParticipationDeliberationCitizens JuriesDiscrete Choice ExperimentsPreferencesPriority Setting |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
English |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Paul Burton Jennifer A Whitty Elizabeth Kendall Julie Ratcliffe Andrew Wilson Peter Littlejohns Paul A Scuffham |
| spellingShingle |
Paul Burton Jennifer A Whitty Elizabeth Kendall Julie Ratcliffe Andrew Wilson Peter Littlejohns Paul A Scuffham Public Participation: Methods Matter; A Response to Boaz et al. International Journal of Health Policy and Management Public Participation Deliberation Citizens Juries Discrete Choice Experiments Preferences Priority Setting |
| author_facet |
Paul Burton Jennifer A Whitty Elizabeth Kendall Julie Ratcliffe Andrew Wilson Peter Littlejohns Paul A Scuffham |
| author_sort |
Paul Burton |
| title |
Public Participation: Methods Matter; A Response to Boaz et al. |
| title_short |
Public Participation: Methods Matter; A Response to Boaz et al. |
| title_full |
Public Participation: Methods Matter; A Response to Boaz et al. |
| title_fullStr |
Public Participation: Methods Matter; A Response to Boaz et al. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Public Participation: Methods Matter; A Response to Boaz et al. |
| title_sort |
public participation: methods matter; a response to boaz et al. |
| publisher |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
| series |
International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
| issn |
2322-5939 2322-5939 |
| publishDate |
2014-11-01 |
| description |
The commentary on our paper from Boaz et al. is both welcome and pertinent, especially in its call for greater critical attention to be paid to some of the underlying principles of participation as well as to techniques and methods (1,2). In some respects our paper and subsequent research was designed to allow us to measure and better understand the impact of participating in a citizen’s jury on the jurors’ views and expressed preferences (1,3). |
| topic |
Public Participation Deliberation Citizens Juries Discrete Choice Experiments Preferences Priority Setting |
| url |
http://www.ijhpm.com/pdf_2904_a6c5c3d976406984793bf0afc1a512db.html |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT paulburton publicparticipationmethodsmatteraresponsetoboazetal AT jenniferawhitty publicparticipationmethodsmatteraresponsetoboazetal AT elizabethkendall publicparticipationmethodsmatteraresponsetoboazetal AT julieratcliffe publicparticipationmethodsmatteraresponsetoboazetal AT andrewwilson publicparticipationmethodsmatteraresponsetoboazetal AT peterlittlejohns publicparticipationmethodsmatteraresponsetoboazetal AT paulascuffham publicparticipationmethodsmatteraresponsetoboazetal |
| _version_ |
1725460893649600512 |