The role of the polish Government in execution of the judgements of the European Court of Human Rights

The specificity of the Strasbourg judgments is versatile and concerns many different areas of social life that it is not possible to effectively adapt legal norms and apply their interpretation by one entity of public authority. It can be said with full conviction that the execution of judgments is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Katarzyna Grzelak-Bach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina 2019-12-01
Series:Espaço Jurídico
Subjects:
Online Access:https://portalperiodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20211
id doaj-283b11d1e70642beacbd2592ad13bfae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-283b11d1e70642beacbd2592ad13bfae2020-11-25T03:55:14Zeng Universidade do Oeste de Santa CatarinaEspaço Jurídico1519-58992179-79432019-12-0120210.18593/ejjl.2021120211The role of the polish Government in execution of the judgements of the European Court of Human RightsKatarzyna Grzelak-BachThe specificity of the Strasbourg judgments is versatile and concerns many different areas of social life that it is not possible to effectively adapt legal norms and apply their interpretation by one entity of public authority. It can be said with full conviction that the execution of judgments is a continuous process and will last as long as the European Court of Human Rights is functioning; surely it will not end with the completion of the most difficult cases. It is important for the national system for the protection of human rights to be very efficient in the context of the protection of human rights. If, however, there is a violation of the norms of international agreements, Poland must be effective in meeting obligations such as the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. There are two aspects involved in fulfilling obligations under international law arising from the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The first one is the introduction of appropriate standards of respect for the rights and freedoms enshrined in the treaty, and the second one is the obligation to enforce judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of a stated infringement of the Convention. Both obligations must be carried out simultaneously by the state – which, as a party to the Convention, respects its provisions and fulfills the required international legal obligations. The subject of this paper is to present the powers and legitimacy of the body of the executive in Poland in connection with the execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. https://portalperiodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20211Human rightsEuropean Court of Human RightsExecution of judgmentsThe executive powerCouncil of Europe
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katarzyna Grzelak-Bach
spellingShingle Katarzyna Grzelak-Bach
The role of the polish Government in execution of the judgements of the European Court of Human Rights
Espaço Jurídico
Human rights
European Court of Human Rights
Execution of judgments
The executive power
Council of Europe
author_facet Katarzyna Grzelak-Bach
author_sort Katarzyna Grzelak-Bach
title The role of the polish Government in execution of the judgements of the European Court of Human Rights
title_short The role of the polish Government in execution of the judgements of the European Court of Human Rights
title_full The role of the polish Government in execution of the judgements of the European Court of Human Rights
title_fullStr The role of the polish Government in execution of the judgements of the European Court of Human Rights
title_full_unstemmed The role of the polish Government in execution of the judgements of the European Court of Human Rights
title_sort role of the polish government in execution of the judgements of the european court of human rights
publisher Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina
series Espaço Jurídico
issn 1519-5899
2179-7943
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The specificity of the Strasbourg judgments is versatile and concerns many different areas of social life that it is not possible to effectively adapt legal norms and apply their interpretation by one entity of public authority. It can be said with full conviction that the execution of judgments is a continuous process and will last as long as the European Court of Human Rights is functioning; surely it will not end with the completion of the most difficult cases. It is important for the national system for the protection of human rights to be very efficient in the context of the protection of human rights. If, however, there is a violation of the norms of international agreements, Poland must be effective in meeting obligations such as the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. There are two aspects involved in fulfilling obligations under international law arising from the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The first one is the introduction of appropriate standards of respect for the rights and freedoms enshrined in the treaty, and the second one is the obligation to enforce judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of a stated infringement of the Convention. Both obligations must be carried out simultaneously by the state – which, as a party to the Convention, respects its provisions and fulfills the required international legal obligations. The subject of this paper is to present the powers and legitimacy of the body of the executive in Poland in connection with the execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.
topic Human rights
European Court of Human Rights
Execution of judgments
The executive power
Council of Europe
url https://portalperiodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20211
work_keys_str_mv AT katarzynagrzelakbach theroleofthepolishgovernmentinexecutionofthejudgementsoftheeuropeancourtofhumanrights
AT katarzynagrzelakbach roleofthepolishgovernmentinexecutionofthejudgementsoftheeuropeancourtofhumanrights
_version_ 1724469767713062912