Performance and mapping of direct injection diesel engine using waste cooking oil biodiesel fuel

Engine performance and mapping were done using diesel and used cooking oil biodiesel fuels. This was done using the Tempest, 1500 cc compression ignition engine testbed. This engine is connected to a dynamometer testbed and its control panel to measure the needed performance parameters. The cranksha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jehad Yamin, Ahmad Jehad Abu Mushref
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-05-01
Series:Advances in Mechanical Engineering
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814019851679
id doaj-2844db58ddd84fd2b94e69c25cef976d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2844db58ddd84fd2b94e69c25cef976d2020-11-25T03:42:59ZengSAGE PublishingAdvances in Mechanical Engineering1687-81402019-05-011110.1177/1687814019851679Performance and mapping of direct injection diesel engine using waste cooking oil biodiesel fuelJehad YaminAhmad Jehad Abu MushrefEngine performance and mapping were done using diesel and used cooking oil biodiesel fuels. This was done using the Tempest, 1500 cc compression ignition engine testbed. This engine is connected to a dynamometer testbed and its control panel to measure the needed performance parameters. The crankshaft speed varied between 35 and 60 rps, while the load tested from no load to full load. The engine speed according to the manufacturer should not exceed 60 rps. The coolant temperature remained almost constant at around 70 o C. The experimental results were then utilized to adjust the engine simulation model using the Diesel-RK software. Results showed that improvement in engine operation with diesel is slightly compared with that of biodiesel fuel. It was also found that the combustion process with biodiesel starts earlier during the mixing phase than diesel fuel. The primary results showed that using potassium hydroxide as a catalyst, the biodiesel yielded 45% more compared with sodium hydroxide, 5% higher calorific value, and 10% lower viscosity. From mapping point of view, the results showed that biofuel has a lower thermal efficiency than the regular diesel. A diesel-powered engine has the lowest fuel consumption of around 250–300 g/kWh at the relatively higher power and mean effective pressure values. While for the biodiesel fuels this is around 350 g/kWh at relatively lower engine speeds, power, and mean effective cylinder pressure. From heat release rate point of view, biodiesel burns earlier than diesel fuel due to higher cetane number and reduced delay periods, on cylinder pressure and temperatures, for the ignition timing and engine-operating parameters, diesel shows better performance than biodiesel for high and half loads.https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814019851679
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jehad Yamin
Ahmad Jehad Abu Mushref
spellingShingle Jehad Yamin
Ahmad Jehad Abu Mushref
Performance and mapping of direct injection diesel engine using waste cooking oil biodiesel fuel
Advances in Mechanical Engineering
author_facet Jehad Yamin
Ahmad Jehad Abu Mushref
author_sort Jehad Yamin
title Performance and mapping of direct injection diesel engine using waste cooking oil biodiesel fuel
title_short Performance and mapping of direct injection diesel engine using waste cooking oil biodiesel fuel
title_full Performance and mapping of direct injection diesel engine using waste cooking oil biodiesel fuel
title_fullStr Performance and mapping of direct injection diesel engine using waste cooking oil biodiesel fuel
title_full_unstemmed Performance and mapping of direct injection diesel engine using waste cooking oil biodiesel fuel
title_sort performance and mapping of direct injection diesel engine using waste cooking oil biodiesel fuel
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Advances in Mechanical Engineering
issn 1687-8140
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Engine performance and mapping were done using diesel and used cooking oil biodiesel fuels. This was done using the Tempest, 1500 cc compression ignition engine testbed. This engine is connected to a dynamometer testbed and its control panel to measure the needed performance parameters. The crankshaft speed varied between 35 and 60 rps, while the load tested from no load to full load. The engine speed according to the manufacturer should not exceed 60 rps. The coolant temperature remained almost constant at around 70 o C. The experimental results were then utilized to adjust the engine simulation model using the Diesel-RK software. Results showed that improvement in engine operation with diesel is slightly compared with that of biodiesel fuel. It was also found that the combustion process with biodiesel starts earlier during the mixing phase than diesel fuel. The primary results showed that using potassium hydroxide as a catalyst, the biodiesel yielded 45% more compared with sodium hydroxide, 5% higher calorific value, and 10% lower viscosity. From mapping point of view, the results showed that biofuel has a lower thermal efficiency than the regular diesel. A diesel-powered engine has the lowest fuel consumption of around 250–300 g/kWh at the relatively higher power and mean effective pressure values. While for the biodiesel fuels this is around 350 g/kWh at relatively lower engine speeds, power, and mean effective cylinder pressure. From heat release rate point of view, biodiesel burns earlier than diesel fuel due to higher cetane number and reduced delay periods, on cylinder pressure and temperatures, for the ignition timing and engine-operating parameters, diesel shows better performance than biodiesel for high and half loads.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814019851679
work_keys_str_mv AT jehadyamin performanceandmappingofdirectinjectiondieselengineusingwastecookingoilbiodieselfuel
AT ahmadjehadabumushref performanceandmappingofdirectinjectiondieselengineusingwastecookingoilbiodieselfuel
_version_ 1724522140977332224