Collocation networks in the language of crime journalism

Standard procedures for the treatment of collocates, which involve the elaboration of lists of collocates on a two-by-two basis, are far from optimum for the study of connectivity, i.e. observing whether these collocates in turn display a tendency to co-occur or not. This paper explores an alternat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David Brett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Editura Universitatii din Oradea 2017-12-01
Series:Studii de Lingvistica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://studiidelingvistica.uoradea.ro/docs/7-2017/pdf_uri/Brett.pdf
id doaj-284d61b4e3404f128726f99df1c20314
record_format Article
spelling doaj-284d61b4e3404f128726f99df1c203142020-11-24T22:44:45ZengEditura Universitatii din OradeaStudii de Lingvistica2248-25472284-54372017-12-017125144Collocation networks in the language of crime journalismDavid Brett0Università degli Studi di SassariStandard procedures for the treatment of collocates, which involve the elaboration of lists of collocates on a two-by-two basis, are far from optimum for the study of connectivity, i.e. observing whether these collocates in turn display a tendency to co-occur or not. This paper explores an alternative strategy that has garnered considerable interest in recent years: that of using Social Network Analysis procedures. Lists of collocates (concgrams) were extracted from a one million word corpus of crime journalism using standard techniques. Gephi software was then used to transform the list of collocates into a network. A small number of collocate pairs were seen to be isolates, i.e. collocating only with each other, while the majority belonged to the giant component, composed of pairs in which at least one member collocates with at least one other word. Modules (clusters of highly interconnected collocates) were identified; these were seen to pertain to specific subject areas. The corpus was then re-examined to see where these clusters of collocates occurred, and co-occurred, and to gauge how much this technique may tell us about the ‘aboutness’ of particular texts.http://studiidelingvistica.uoradea.ro/docs/7-2017/pdf_uri/Brett.pdfsocial network analysiscollocationcollocate networksnewspaper languagecrime journalism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David Brett
spellingShingle David Brett
Collocation networks in the language of crime journalism
Studii de Lingvistica
social network analysis
collocation
collocate networks
newspaper language
crime journalism
author_facet David Brett
author_sort David Brett
title Collocation networks in the language of crime journalism
title_short Collocation networks in the language of crime journalism
title_full Collocation networks in the language of crime journalism
title_fullStr Collocation networks in the language of crime journalism
title_full_unstemmed Collocation networks in the language of crime journalism
title_sort collocation networks in the language of crime journalism
publisher Editura Universitatii din Oradea
series Studii de Lingvistica
issn 2248-2547
2284-5437
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Standard procedures for the treatment of collocates, which involve the elaboration of lists of collocates on a two-by-two basis, are far from optimum for the study of connectivity, i.e. observing whether these collocates in turn display a tendency to co-occur or not. This paper explores an alternative strategy that has garnered considerable interest in recent years: that of using Social Network Analysis procedures. Lists of collocates (concgrams) were extracted from a one million word corpus of crime journalism using standard techniques. Gephi software was then used to transform the list of collocates into a network. A small number of collocate pairs were seen to be isolates, i.e. collocating only with each other, while the majority belonged to the giant component, composed of pairs in which at least one member collocates with at least one other word. Modules (clusters of highly interconnected collocates) were identified; these were seen to pertain to specific subject areas. The corpus was then re-examined to see where these clusters of collocates occurred, and co-occurred, and to gauge how much this technique may tell us about the ‘aboutness’ of particular texts.
topic social network analysis
collocation
collocate networks
newspaper language
crime journalism
url http://studiidelingvistica.uoradea.ro/docs/7-2017/pdf_uri/Brett.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT davidbrett collocationnetworksinthelanguageofcrimejournalism
_version_ 1725690630912344064