In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues

This article examines the relations between the European Parliament (EP) and civil society organizations (CSOs) in the EU’s legislative process. It focuses specifically on legislative trilogues, an informal institution bringing together the representatives of the EP, Council, and Commission in a sec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Justin Greenwood, Christilla Roederer-Rynning
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2019-09-01
Series:Politics and Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2175
id doaj-28647c14991f4cf5bea8338c634e590c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-28647c14991f4cf5bea8338c634e590c2020-11-25T02:28:55ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632019-09-017331632610.17645/pag.v7i3.21751166In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of TriloguesJustin Greenwood0Christilla Roederer-Rynning1Aberdeen Business School, Robert Gordon University, UKDepartment of Political Science and Public Management, University of Southern Denmark, DenmarkThis article examines the relations between the European Parliament (EP) and civil society organizations (CSOs) in the EU’s legislative process. It focuses specifically on legislative trilogues, an informal institution bringing together the representatives of the EP, Council, and Commission in a secluded setting to conclude legislative agreements. Trilogues have become the modus operandi and an absolutely pivotal part of the EU law-making process: they are where the deals are made. While secluded decision-making offers plenty of opportunities for EU institutions to depoliticize law-making, we argue that trilogues have become politicized, partly from the relationship between the EP and CSOs. We flesh out this argument on the basis of insights from the politicization and the historical institutionalist literatures, advance two ideal types of trilogue politics, and explore these types on the basis of a preliminary examination of a comprehensive interview material.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2175civil society organisationsEuropean Parliamentinstitutionalismlaw-makinglegislative processpoliticisationtrilogues
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Justin Greenwood
Christilla Roederer-Rynning
spellingShingle Justin Greenwood
Christilla Roederer-Rynning
In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues
Politics and Governance
civil society organisations
European Parliament
institutionalism
law-making
legislative process
politicisation
trilogues
author_facet Justin Greenwood
Christilla Roederer-Rynning
author_sort Justin Greenwood
title In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues
title_short In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues
title_full In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues
title_fullStr In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues
title_full_unstemmed In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues
title_sort in the shadow of public opinion: the european parliament, civil society organizations, and the politicization of trilogues
publisher Cogitatio
series Politics and Governance
issn 2183-2463
publishDate 2019-09-01
description This article examines the relations between the European Parliament (EP) and civil society organizations (CSOs) in the EU’s legislative process. It focuses specifically on legislative trilogues, an informal institution bringing together the representatives of the EP, Council, and Commission in a secluded setting to conclude legislative agreements. Trilogues have become the modus operandi and an absolutely pivotal part of the EU law-making process: they are where the deals are made. While secluded decision-making offers plenty of opportunities for EU institutions to depoliticize law-making, we argue that trilogues have become politicized, partly from the relationship between the EP and CSOs. We flesh out this argument on the basis of insights from the politicization and the historical institutionalist literatures, advance two ideal types of trilogue politics, and explore these types on the basis of a preliminary examination of a comprehensive interview material.
topic civil society organisations
European Parliament
institutionalism
law-making
legislative process
politicisation
trilogues
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2175
work_keys_str_mv AT justingreenwood intheshadowofpublicopiniontheeuropeanparliamentcivilsocietyorganizationsandthepoliticizationoftrilogues
AT christillaroedererrynning intheshadowofpublicopiniontheeuropeanparliamentcivilsocietyorganizationsandthepoliticizationoftrilogues
_version_ 1724835679357108224