In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues
This article examines the relations between the European Parliament (EP) and civil society organizations (CSOs) in the EU’s legislative process. It focuses specifically on legislative trilogues, an informal institution bringing together the representatives of the EP, Council, and Commission in a sec...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cogitatio
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Politics and Governance |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2175 |
id |
doaj-28647c14991f4cf5bea8338c634e590c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-28647c14991f4cf5bea8338c634e590c2020-11-25T02:28:55ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632019-09-017331632610.17645/pag.v7i3.21751166In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of TriloguesJustin Greenwood0Christilla Roederer-Rynning1Aberdeen Business School, Robert Gordon University, UKDepartment of Political Science and Public Management, University of Southern Denmark, DenmarkThis article examines the relations between the European Parliament (EP) and civil society organizations (CSOs) in the EU’s legislative process. It focuses specifically on legislative trilogues, an informal institution bringing together the representatives of the EP, Council, and Commission in a secluded setting to conclude legislative agreements. Trilogues have become the modus operandi and an absolutely pivotal part of the EU law-making process: they are where the deals are made. While secluded decision-making offers plenty of opportunities for EU institutions to depoliticize law-making, we argue that trilogues have become politicized, partly from the relationship between the EP and CSOs. We flesh out this argument on the basis of insights from the politicization and the historical institutionalist literatures, advance two ideal types of trilogue politics, and explore these types on the basis of a preliminary examination of a comprehensive interview material.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2175civil society organisationsEuropean Parliamentinstitutionalismlaw-makinglegislative processpoliticisationtrilogues |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Justin Greenwood Christilla Roederer-Rynning |
spellingShingle |
Justin Greenwood Christilla Roederer-Rynning In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues Politics and Governance civil society organisations European Parliament institutionalism law-making legislative process politicisation trilogues |
author_facet |
Justin Greenwood Christilla Roederer-Rynning |
author_sort |
Justin Greenwood |
title |
In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues |
title_short |
In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues |
title_full |
In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues |
title_fullStr |
In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues |
title_full_unstemmed |
In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues |
title_sort |
in the shadow of public opinion: the european parliament, civil society organizations, and the politicization of trilogues |
publisher |
Cogitatio |
series |
Politics and Governance |
issn |
2183-2463 |
publishDate |
2019-09-01 |
description |
This article examines the relations between the European Parliament (EP) and civil society organizations (CSOs) in the EU’s legislative process. It focuses specifically on legislative trilogues, an informal institution bringing together the representatives of the EP, Council, and Commission in a secluded setting to conclude legislative agreements. Trilogues have become the modus operandi and an absolutely pivotal part of the EU law-making process: they are where the deals are made. While secluded decision-making offers plenty of opportunities for EU institutions to depoliticize law-making, we argue that trilogues have become politicized, partly from the relationship between the EP and CSOs. We flesh out this argument on the basis of insights from the politicization and the historical institutionalist literatures, advance two ideal types of trilogue politics, and explore these types on the basis of a preliminary examination of a comprehensive interview material. |
topic |
civil society organisations European Parliament institutionalism law-making legislative process politicisation trilogues |
url |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2175 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT justingreenwood intheshadowofpublicopiniontheeuropeanparliamentcivilsocietyorganizationsandthepoliticizationoftrilogues AT christillaroedererrynning intheshadowofpublicopiniontheeuropeanparliamentcivilsocietyorganizationsandthepoliticizationoftrilogues |
_version_ |
1724835679357108224 |