Comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopies

Différent methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat flux densifies are presented and compared above a gras covered fallow. The aerodynamic (AD) and eddy covariance (EC) methods are presented and compared for both momentum and sensible heat measurements. In addition, the temperature fluctu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marc Aubinet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux 1997-01-01
Series:Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.pressesagro.be/base/text/v1n1/17.pdf
id doaj-288fc5c7881d420b82430e9ed189d942
record_format Article
spelling doaj-288fc5c7881d420b82430e9ed189d9422020-11-24T23:56:36ZengPresses Agronomiques de GemblouxBiotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement1370-62331780-45071997-01-01111725Comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopiesMarc AubinetDifférent methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat flux densifies are presented and compared above a gras covered fallow. The aerodynamic (AD) and eddy covariance (EC) methods are presented and compared for both momentum and sensible heat measurements. In addition, the temperature fluctuation (TF) method is compared to the HEC method for the sensible heat flux measurement. The AD and EC methods are in good agreement for the momentum flux measurements. For the sensible heat flux, the AD method is very sensible to temperature errors. So it is unusable during night and gives biased estimations during the day. The TF method gives only estimations of the sensible heat flux. It is in good agreement with the EC method during the day but diverges completely during night, being unable to disceming positive from négative fluxes. From the three methods, the EC method is the sole that allows to measure continuously both momentum and sensible heat flux but it requires a loud data treatment. We présent in this paper the algorithm used for this treatment.http://www.pressesagro.be/base/text/v1n1/17.pdfEddy covariancetemperature fluctuationaerodynamic methodflux measurement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marc Aubinet
spellingShingle Marc Aubinet
Comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopies
Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement
Eddy covariance
temperature fluctuation
aerodynamic method
flux measurement
author_facet Marc Aubinet
author_sort Marc Aubinet
title Comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopies
title_short Comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopies
title_full Comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopies
title_fullStr Comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopies
title_sort comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopies
publisher Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux
series Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement
issn 1370-6233
1780-4507
publishDate 1997-01-01
description Différent methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat flux densifies are presented and compared above a gras covered fallow. The aerodynamic (AD) and eddy covariance (EC) methods are presented and compared for both momentum and sensible heat measurements. In addition, the temperature fluctuation (TF) method is compared to the HEC method for the sensible heat flux measurement. The AD and EC methods are in good agreement for the momentum flux measurements. For the sensible heat flux, the AD method is very sensible to temperature errors. So it is unusable during night and gives biased estimations during the day. The TF method gives only estimations of the sensible heat flux. It is in good agreement with the EC method during the day but diverges completely during night, being unable to disceming positive from négative fluxes. From the three methods, the EC method is the sole that allows to measure continuously both momentum and sensible heat flux but it requires a loud data treatment. We présent in this paper the algorithm used for this treatment.
topic Eddy covariance
temperature fluctuation
aerodynamic method
flux measurement
url http://www.pressesagro.be/base/text/v1n1/17.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT marcaubinet comparisonbetweendifferentmethodsofmeasurementofmomentumandsensibleheatfluxesovercanopies
_version_ 1725457648486187008