Comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopies
Différent methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat flux densifies are presented and compared above a gras covered fallow. The aerodynamic (AD) and eddy covariance (EC) methods are presented and compared for both momentum and sensible heat measurements. In addition, the temperature fluctu...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux
1997-01-01
|
Series: | Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.pressesagro.be/base/text/v1n1/17.pdf |
id |
doaj-288fc5c7881d420b82430e9ed189d942 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-288fc5c7881d420b82430e9ed189d9422020-11-24T23:56:36ZengPresses Agronomiques de GemblouxBiotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement1370-62331780-45071997-01-01111725Comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopiesMarc AubinetDifférent methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat flux densifies are presented and compared above a gras covered fallow. The aerodynamic (AD) and eddy covariance (EC) methods are presented and compared for both momentum and sensible heat measurements. In addition, the temperature fluctuation (TF) method is compared to the HEC method for the sensible heat flux measurement. The AD and EC methods are in good agreement for the momentum flux measurements. For the sensible heat flux, the AD method is very sensible to temperature errors. So it is unusable during night and gives biased estimations during the day. The TF method gives only estimations of the sensible heat flux. It is in good agreement with the EC method during the day but diverges completely during night, being unable to disceming positive from négative fluxes. From the three methods, the EC method is the sole that allows to measure continuously both momentum and sensible heat flux but it requires a loud data treatment. We présent in this paper the algorithm used for this treatment.http://www.pressesagro.be/base/text/v1n1/17.pdfEddy covariancetemperature fluctuationaerodynamic methodflux measurement |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marc Aubinet |
spellingShingle |
Marc Aubinet Comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopies Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement Eddy covariance temperature fluctuation aerodynamic method flux measurement |
author_facet |
Marc Aubinet |
author_sort |
Marc Aubinet |
title |
Comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopies |
title_short |
Comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopies |
title_full |
Comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopies |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopies |
title_sort |
comparison between different methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat fluxes over canopies |
publisher |
Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux |
series |
Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement |
issn |
1370-6233 1780-4507 |
publishDate |
1997-01-01 |
description |
Différent methods of measurement of momentum and sensible heat flux densifies are presented and compared above a gras covered fallow. The aerodynamic (AD) and eddy covariance (EC) methods are presented and compared for both momentum and sensible heat measurements. In addition, the temperature fluctuation (TF) method is compared to the HEC method for the sensible heat flux measurement. The AD and EC methods are in good agreement for the momentum flux measurements. For the sensible heat flux, the AD method is very sensible to temperature errors. So it is unusable during night and gives biased estimations during the day. The TF method gives only estimations of the sensible heat flux. It is in good agreement with the EC method during the day but diverges completely during night, being unable to disceming positive from négative fluxes. From the three methods, the EC method is the sole that allows to measure continuously both momentum and sensible heat flux but it requires a loud data treatment. We présent in this paper the algorithm used for this treatment. |
topic |
Eddy covariance temperature fluctuation aerodynamic method flux measurement |
url |
http://www.pressesagro.be/base/text/v1n1/17.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marcaubinet comparisonbetweendifferentmethodsofmeasurementofmomentumandsensibleheatfluxesovercanopies |
_version_ |
1725457648486187008 |