« La masculine, le féminin / Corriger la nature »

Through the formal issues raised by the works of Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo the enigmatic nature of certain figures’ sexual identity will receive less attention in future than the neutralisation - or even distortion - of their genders. In what ways does the androgynous figure harmonise with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Frédérique Villemur
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Centre d´Histoire et Théorie des Arts 2006-09-01
Series:Images Re-Vues
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/imagesrevues/188
id doaj-28f0a8dbbb2d434ea50896ef3424ae1e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-28f0a8dbbb2d434ea50896ef3424ae1e2020-11-24T20:44:17ZfraCentre d´Histoire et Théorie des ArtsImages Re-Vues1778-38012006-09-013« La masculine, le féminin / Corriger la nature »Frédérique VillemurThrough the formal issues raised by the works of Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo the enigmatic nature of certain figures’ sexual identity will receive less attention in future than the neutralisation - or even distortion - of their genders. In what ways does the androgynous figure harmonise with an ideal of beauty combining the genders as much as it reveals a perfect familiarity with the sexual differences it aims to destabilise? More precisely, what effects do the indefinite and non finito have on the masculine and feminine in such distinct rival arts as painting and sculpture? We shall see that androgyny has a figurative virtuality, and that with Leonardo da Vinci its efficacy is due to the power of the indistinct, to a fusion of the genders towards the neuter, while for Michelangelo it strives to exhaust the opposites in their antagonisms to the point of their possible aberration.http://journals.openedition.org/imagesrevues/188androgyneArasse (Daniel)genderLeonardo de VinciMichel-Angenon finito
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frédérique Villemur
spellingShingle Frédérique Villemur
« La masculine, le féminin / Corriger la nature »
Images Re-Vues
androgyne
Arasse (Daniel)
gender
Leonardo de Vinci
Michel-Ange
non finito
author_facet Frédérique Villemur
author_sort Frédérique Villemur
title « La masculine, le féminin / Corriger la nature »
title_short « La masculine, le féminin / Corriger la nature »
title_full « La masculine, le féminin / Corriger la nature »
title_fullStr « La masculine, le féminin / Corriger la nature »
title_full_unstemmed « La masculine, le féminin / Corriger la nature »
title_sort « la masculine, le féminin / corriger la nature »
publisher Centre d´Histoire et Théorie des Arts
series Images Re-Vues
issn 1778-3801
publishDate 2006-09-01
description Through the formal issues raised by the works of Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo the enigmatic nature of certain figures’ sexual identity will receive less attention in future than the neutralisation - or even distortion - of their genders. In what ways does the androgynous figure harmonise with an ideal of beauty combining the genders as much as it reveals a perfect familiarity with the sexual differences it aims to destabilise? More precisely, what effects do the indefinite and non finito have on the masculine and feminine in such distinct rival arts as painting and sculpture? We shall see that androgyny has a figurative virtuality, and that with Leonardo da Vinci its efficacy is due to the power of the indistinct, to a fusion of the genders towards the neuter, while for Michelangelo it strives to exhaust the opposites in their antagonisms to the point of their possible aberration.
topic androgyne
Arasse (Daniel)
gender
Leonardo de Vinci
Michel-Ange
non finito
url http://journals.openedition.org/imagesrevues/188
work_keys_str_mv AT frederiquevillemur lamasculinelefeminincorrigerlanature
_version_ 1716817862481412096