Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Customized unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (C-UKA) utilizes implants manufactured on an individual patient basis, derived from pre-operative computed tomography images in an effort to more closely approximate the natural anatomy of the knee. The outcomes from 349 medial and lateral fixed-bearing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cyrus Anthony Pumilia, Lennart Schroeder, Nana O. Sarpong, Gregory Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Journal of Personalized Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/8/753
id doaj-28fcbdf4557948adb2aeb5392e732c77
record_format Article
spelling doaj-28fcbdf4557948adb2aeb5392e732c772021-08-26T13:57:52ZengMDPI AGJournal of Personalized Medicine2075-44262021-07-011175375310.3390/jpm11080753Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee ArthroplastyCyrus Anthony Pumilia0Lennart Schroeder1Nana O. Sarpong2Gregory Martin3College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USADepartment of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University, 81377 Munich, GermanyColumbia University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York—Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Personalized Orthopaedics of the Palm Beaches, Boynton Beach, FL 33437, USACustomized unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (C-UKA) utilizes implants manufactured on an individual patient basis, derived from pre-operative computed tomography images in an effort to more closely approximate the natural anatomy of the knee. The outcomes from 349 medial and lateral fixed-bearing C-UKA were reviewed. Implant survivorship analysis was conducted via retrospective chart review, and follow-up analysis was conducted via a single postoperative phone call or email. The rate of follow-up was 69% (242 knees). The average age at surgery was 71.1 years and the average body mass index was 28.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Seven revision arthroplasties (2.1%) had knowingly been performed at an average of 1.9 years postoperatively (range: 0.1–3.9 years), resulting in an implant survivorship of 97.9% at an average follow-up of 4.2 years (range: 0.1–8.7) and 97.9% at an average of 4.8 years (range: 2.0–8.7) when knees with less than two years of follow-up were excluded. The reasons for revision were implant loosening (one knee), infection (two knees), progression of osteoarthritis (two knees), and unknown reasons (two knees). The average KOOS, JR. interval score was 84 (SD: 14.4). Of those able to be contacted for follow-up analysis, 67% were “very satisfied,” 26% were “satisfied,” 4% were “neutral,” 2% were “dissatisfied,” and 1% were “very dissatisfied.” When asked if the knee felt “natural,” 60% responded with “always,” 35% responded with “sometimes,” and 5% responded with “never.” After analyzing a large cohort of C-UKA, we found favorable rates of survivorship, satisfaction, and patient-reported functional outcomes.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/8/753patient-specificindividualized3D-printingunicondylar knee arthroplastyunicompartmental knee replacementunicondylar knee replacement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cyrus Anthony Pumilia
Lennart Schroeder
Nana O. Sarpong
Gregory Martin
spellingShingle Cyrus Anthony Pumilia
Lennart Schroeder
Nana O. Sarpong
Gregory Martin
Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
Journal of Personalized Medicine
patient-specific
individualized
3D-printing
unicondylar knee arthroplasty
unicompartmental knee replacement
unicondylar knee replacement
author_facet Cyrus Anthony Pumilia
Lennart Schroeder
Nana O. Sarpong
Gregory Martin
author_sort Cyrus Anthony Pumilia
title Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
title_short Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
title_full Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
title_sort patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, and implant survivorship in patients undergoing customized unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Personalized Medicine
issn 2075-4426
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Customized unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (C-UKA) utilizes implants manufactured on an individual patient basis, derived from pre-operative computed tomography images in an effort to more closely approximate the natural anatomy of the knee. The outcomes from 349 medial and lateral fixed-bearing C-UKA were reviewed. Implant survivorship analysis was conducted via retrospective chart review, and follow-up analysis was conducted via a single postoperative phone call or email. The rate of follow-up was 69% (242 knees). The average age at surgery was 71.1 years and the average body mass index was 28.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Seven revision arthroplasties (2.1%) had knowingly been performed at an average of 1.9 years postoperatively (range: 0.1–3.9 years), resulting in an implant survivorship of 97.9% at an average follow-up of 4.2 years (range: 0.1–8.7) and 97.9% at an average of 4.8 years (range: 2.0–8.7) when knees with less than two years of follow-up were excluded. The reasons for revision were implant loosening (one knee), infection (two knees), progression of osteoarthritis (two knees), and unknown reasons (two knees). The average KOOS, JR. interval score was 84 (SD: 14.4). Of those able to be contacted for follow-up analysis, 67% were “very satisfied,” 26% were “satisfied,” 4% were “neutral,” 2% were “dissatisfied,” and 1% were “very dissatisfied.” When asked if the knee felt “natural,” 60% responded with “always,” 35% responded with “sometimes,” and 5% responded with “never.” After analyzing a large cohort of C-UKA, we found favorable rates of survivorship, satisfaction, and patient-reported functional outcomes.
topic patient-specific
individualized
3D-printing
unicondylar knee arthroplasty
unicompartmental knee replacement
unicondylar knee replacement
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/8/753
work_keys_str_mv AT cyrusanthonypumilia patientsatisfactionfunctionaloutcomesandimplantsurvivorshipinpatientsundergoingcustomizedunicompartmentalkneearthroplasty
AT lennartschroeder patientsatisfactionfunctionaloutcomesandimplantsurvivorshipinpatientsundergoingcustomizedunicompartmentalkneearthroplasty
AT nanaosarpong patientsatisfactionfunctionaloutcomesandimplantsurvivorshipinpatientsundergoingcustomizedunicompartmentalkneearthroplasty
AT gregorymartin patientsatisfactionfunctionaloutcomesandimplantsurvivorshipinpatientsundergoingcustomizedunicompartmentalkneearthroplasty
_version_ 1721192133888573440