Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
Customized unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (C-UKA) utilizes implants manufactured on an individual patient basis, derived from pre-operative computed tomography images in an effort to more closely approximate the natural anatomy of the knee. The outcomes from 349 medial and lateral fixed-bearing...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of Personalized Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/8/753 |
id |
doaj-28fcbdf4557948adb2aeb5392e732c77 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-28fcbdf4557948adb2aeb5392e732c772021-08-26T13:57:52ZengMDPI AGJournal of Personalized Medicine2075-44262021-07-011175375310.3390/jpm11080753Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee ArthroplastyCyrus Anthony Pumilia0Lennart Schroeder1Nana O. Sarpong2Gregory Martin3College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USADepartment of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University, 81377 Munich, GermanyColumbia University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York—Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Personalized Orthopaedics of the Palm Beaches, Boynton Beach, FL 33437, USACustomized unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (C-UKA) utilizes implants manufactured on an individual patient basis, derived from pre-operative computed tomography images in an effort to more closely approximate the natural anatomy of the knee. The outcomes from 349 medial and lateral fixed-bearing C-UKA were reviewed. Implant survivorship analysis was conducted via retrospective chart review, and follow-up analysis was conducted via a single postoperative phone call or email. The rate of follow-up was 69% (242 knees). The average age at surgery was 71.1 years and the average body mass index was 28.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Seven revision arthroplasties (2.1%) had knowingly been performed at an average of 1.9 years postoperatively (range: 0.1–3.9 years), resulting in an implant survivorship of 97.9% at an average follow-up of 4.2 years (range: 0.1–8.7) and 97.9% at an average of 4.8 years (range: 2.0–8.7) when knees with less than two years of follow-up were excluded. The reasons for revision were implant loosening (one knee), infection (two knees), progression of osteoarthritis (two knees), and unknown reasons (two knees). The average KOOS, JR. interval score was 84 (SD: 14.4). Of those able to be contacted for follow-up analysis, 67% were “very satisfied,” 26% were “satisfied,” 4% were “neutral,” 2% were “dissatisfied,” and 1% were “very dissatisfied.” When asked if the knee felt “natural,” 60% responded with “always,” 35% responded with “sometimes,” and 5% responded with “never.” After analyzing a large cohort of C-UKA, we found favorable rates of survivorship, satisfaction, and patient-reported functional outcomes.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/8/753patient-specificindividualized3D-printingunicondylar knee arthroplastyunicompartmental knee replacementunicondylar knee replacement |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cyrus Anthony Pumilia Lennart Schroeder Nana O. Sarpong Gregory Martin |
spellingShingle |
Cyrus Anthony Pumilia Lennart Schroeder Nana O. Sarpong Gregory Martin Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Journal of Personalized Medicine patient-specific individualized 3D-printing unicondylar knee arthroplasty unicompartmental knee replacement unicondylar knee replacement |
author_facet |
Cyrus Anthony Pumilia Lennart Schroeder Nana O. Sarpong Gregory Martin |
author_sort |
Cyrus Anthony Pumilia |
title |
Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty |
title_short |
Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty |
title_full |
Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty |
title_fullStr |
Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed |
Patient Satisfaction, Functional Outcomes, and Implant Survivorship in Patients Undergoing Customized Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty |
title_sort |
patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, and implant survivorship in patients undergoing customized unicompartmental knee arthroplasty |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Journal of Personalized Medicine |
issn |
2075-4426 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
Customized unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (C-UKA) utilizes implants manufactured on an individual patient basis, derived from pre-operative computed tomography images in an effort to more closely approximate the natural anatomy of the knee. The outcomes from 349 medial and lateral fixed-bearing C-UKA were reviewed. Implant survivorship analysis was conducted via retrospective chart review, and follow-up analysis was conducted via a single postoperative phone call or email. The rate of follow-up was 69% (242 knees). The average age at surgery was 71.1 years and the average body mass index was 28.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Seven revision arthroplasties (2.1%) had knowingly been performed at an average of 1.9 years postoperatively (range: 0.1–3.9 years), resulting in an implant survivorship of 97.9% at an average follow-up of 4.2 years (range: 0.1–8.7) and 97.9% at an average of 4.8 years (range: 2.0–8.7) when knees with less than two years of follow-up were excluded. The reasons for revision were implant loosening (one knee), infection (two knees), progression of osteoarthritis (two knees), and unknown reasons (two knees). The average KOOS, JR. interval score was 84 (SD: 14.4). Of those able to be contacted for follow-up analysis, 67% were “very satisfied,” 26% were “satisfied,” 4% were “neutral,” 2% were “dissatisfied,” and 1% were “very dissatisfied.” When asked if the knee felt “natural,” 60% responded with “always,” 35% responded with “sometimes,” and 5% responded with “never.” After analyzing a large cohort of C-UKA, we found favorable rates of survivorship, satisfaction, and patient-reported functional outcomes. |
topic |
patient-specific individualized 3D-printing unicondylar knee arthroplasty unicompartmental knee replacement unicondylar knee replacement |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/8/753 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cyrusanthonypumilia patientsatisfactionfunctionaloutcomesandimplantsurvivorshipinpatientsundergoingcustomizedunicompartmentalkneearthroplasty AT lennartschroeder patientsatisfactionfunctionaloutcomesandimplantsurvivorshipinpatientsundergoingcustomizedunicompartmentalkneearthroplasty AT nanaosarpong patientsatisfactionfunctionaloutcomesandimplantsurvivorshipinpatientsundergoingcustomizedunicompartmentalkneearthroplasty AT gregorymartin patientsatisfactionfunctionaloutcomesandimplantsurvivorshipinpatientsundergoingcustomizedunicompartmentalkneearthroplasty |
_version_ |
1721192133888573440 |