Efficacy of pneumatic dilatation in Saudi achalasia patients

Background/Aims: Pneumatic dilatation (PD) is one of the effective treatments of achalasia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of pneumatic dilation and patient satisfaction in Saudi achalasia patients. Patients and Methods: We have retrospectively recruited patients with confirmed a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdulrahman M Aljebreen, Sara Samarkandi, Tahani Al-Harbi, Haifa Al-Radhi, Majid A Almadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.saudijgastro.com/article.asp?issn=1319-3767;year=2014;volume=20;issue=1;spage=43;epage=47;aulast=Aljebreen
id doaj-295ea61005494ed2889ad83f145769ef
record_format Article
spelling doaj-295ea61005494ed2889ad83f145769ef2020-11-24T22:05:14ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsThe Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology1319-37671998-40492014-01-01201434710.4103/1319-3767.126317Efficacy of pneumatic dilatation in Saudi achalasia patientsAbdulrahman M AljebreenSara SamarkandiTahani Al-HarbiHaifa Al-RadhiMajid A AlmadiBackground/Aims: Pneumatic dilatation (PD) is one of the effective treatments of achalasia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of pneumatic dilation and patient satisfaction in Saudi achalasia patients. Patients and Methods: We have retrospectively recruited patients with confirmed achalasia, who underwent at least one dilatation session from January 1990 to January 2010 at a single tertiary center. Symptoms, including weight loss, dysphagia, retrosternal pain, and regurgitation, were assessed with the use of the Eckardt score (which ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more pronounced symptoms). All patients were called and asked about their Eckardt score in addition to their satisfaction score post the dilatation procedure. The primary outcome was therapeutic success (Eckardt score ≤ 3) and patient satisfaction at the time of their calls. The secondary outcomes included the need for retreatment and the rate of complications. Results: A total of 29 patients were included, with a mean age of 40.30 (95% CI: 36.1-44.6) and 55.2% of them were males. The mean of the pre-dilatation Eckardt score was 8.3 (95% CI: 7.2-9.4), which dropped to 2.59 (95% CI: 1.7-3.5) after PD (P < 0.01) with a clinical remission of 76.7% after the first dilatation and a total failure in two patients (7%) after the third dilatation. The mean number of dilatations was 1.3 (95% CI: 1.1-1.5) where 50.7% required one dilatation, 19.2% required two dilatations, and 30.1% required three dilatations. The mean of the symptoms-free period was 53.4 months (SD 52.7, range 1-180) with symptoms recurring in 35% of patients within 2 years. The mean of post-PD patient satisfaction was 7.45 (95% CI: 6.2-8.7). Perforation, which was treated conservatively, occurred in one patient (3.5%), whereas bleeding occurred in two patients (7%). Age or gender was not found to be a predictor of Eckardt score improvement on multivariate linear regression analysis. Conclusion: PD is an efficacious procedure in Saudi achalasia patients with a very good overall patient satisfaction with 53.4 months of symptoms-free period after a successful dilatation.http://www.saudijgastro.com/article.asp?issn=1319-3767;year=2014;volume=20;issue=1;spage=43;epage=47;aulast=AljebreenAchalasiadilatationeckdart scoreesophaguspneumatic dilatation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abdulrahman M Aljebreen
Sara Samarkandi
Tahani Al-Harbi
Haifa Al-Radhi
Majid A Almadi
spellingShingle Abdulrahman M Aljebreen
Sara Samarkandi
Tahani Al-Harbi
Haifa Al-Radhi
Majid A Almadi
Efficacy of pneumatic dilatation in Saudi achalasia patients
The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Achalasia
dilatation
eckdart score
esophagus
pneumatic dilatation
author_facet Abdulrahman M Aljebreen
Sara Samarkandi
Tahani Al-Harbi
Haifa Al-Radhi
Majid A Almadi
author_sort Abdulrahman M Aljebreen
title Efficacy of pneumatic dilatation in Saudi achalasia patients
title_short Efficacy of pneumatic dilatation in Saudi achalasia patients
title_full Efficacy of pneumatic dilatation in Saudi achalasia patients
title_fullStr Efficacy of pneumatic dilatation in Saudi achalasia patients
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of pneumatic dilatation in Saudi achalasia patients
title_sort efficacy of pneumatic dilatation in saudi achalasia patients
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
issn 1319-3767
1998-4049
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Background/Aims: Pneumatic dilatation (PD) is one of the effective treatments of achalasia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of pneumatic dilation and patient satisfaction in Saudi achalasia patients. Patients and Methods: We have retrospectively recruited patients with confirmed achalasia, who underwent at least one dilatation session from January 1990 to January 2010 at a single tertiary center. Symptoms, including weight loss, dysphagia, retrosternal pain, and regurgitation, were assessed with the use of the Eckardt score (which ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more pronounced symptoms). All patients were called and asked about their Eckardt score in addition to their satisfaction score post the dilatation procedure. The primary outcome was therapeutic success (Eckardt score ≤ 3) and patient satisfaction at the time of their calls. The secondary outcomes included the need for retreatment and the rate of complications. Results: A total of 29 patients were included, with a mean age of 40.30 (95% CI: 36.1-44.6) and 55.2% of them were males. The mean of the pre-dilatation Eckardt score was 8.3 (95% CI: 7.2-9.4), which dropped to 2.59 (95% CI: 1.7-3.5) after PD (P < 0.01) with a clinical remission of 76.7% after the first dilatation and a total failure in two patients (7%) after the third dilatation. The mean number of dilatations was 1.3 (95% CI: 1.1-1.5) where 50.7% required one dilatation, 19.2% required two dilatations, and 30.1% required three dilatations. The mean of the symptoms-free period was 53.4 months (SD 52.7, range 1-180) with symptoms recurring in 35% of patients within 2 years. The mean of post-PD patient satisfaction was 7.45 (95% CI: 6.2-8.7). Perforation, which was treated conservatively, occurred in one patient (3.5%), whereas bleeding occurred in two patients (7%). Age or gender was not found to be a predictor of Eckardt score improvement on multivariate linear regression analysis. Conclusion: PD is an efficacious procedure in Saudi achalasia patients with a very good overall patient satisfaction with 53.4 months of symptoms-free period after a successful dilatation.
topic Achalasia
dilatation
eckdart score
esophagus
pneumatic dilatation
url http://www.saudijgastro.com/article.asp?issn=1319-3767;year=2014;volume=20;issue=1;spage=43;epage=47;aulast=Aljebreen
work_keys_str_mv AT abdulrahmanmaljebreen efficacyofpneumaticdilatationinsaudiachalasiapatients
AT sarasamarkandi efficacyofpneumaticdilatationinsaudiachalasiapatients
AT tahanialharbi efficacyofpneumaticdilatationinsaudiachalasiapatients
AT haifaalradhi efficacyofpneumaticdilatationinsaudiachalasiapatients
AT majidaalmadi efficacyofpneumaticdilatationinsaudiachalasiapatients
_version_ 1725826727320485888