A comparison of intraocular pressure and hemodynamic responses to insertion of laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube using anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil in cataract surgery

• Main Authors: Mohsen Ziyaeifard, Rasoul Azarfarin, Gholamreza Massoumi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-01-01
• Series: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
• Subjects: Cataract surgery; hemodynamic responses; laryngeal mask airway; propofol; remifentanil
• Online Access: http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2012;volume=17;issue=6;spage=503;epage=507;aulast=Ziyaeifard

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) and hemodynamic responses following insertion of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or endotracheal tube (ETT) after anesthesia induction with propofol and remifentanil in cataract surgery. Materials and Methods: In a randomized controlled study, 50 adults scheduled for elective cataract extraction procedure under general anesthesia were allocated to LMA insertion (n = 25) or ETT (n = 25) groups. IOP, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) were measured after insertion of the airway device every minute up to 5 min. Results: There were no significant differences between LMA and ETT groups in SBP, DBP, HR, and IOP immediately after airway instrumentation up to 5 min, except in 4th min in DBP, 2nd min in HR, and 5th min in IOP (7.9 ± 2.3 mmHg in LMA and 9.4 ± 2.5 mmHg in ETT group; P = 0.030). There was good surgeon satisfaction for providing acceptable surgical field in both groups (88% in LMA and 80% in ETT group; P = 0.702). Conclusion: Propofol combined with remifentanil provides good and excellent conditions for insertion of LMA or ETT with minimal hemodynamic disturbances in cataract surgery. Considering LMA insertion is less traumatic than ETT, using LMA may be better than ETT for airway securing in these patients.