Longitudinal tDCS: Consistency across Working Memory Training Studies

There is great interest in enhancing and maintaining cognitive function. In recent years, advances in noninvasive brain stimulation devices, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have targeted working memory in particular. Despite controversy surrounding outcomes of single-session...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marian E. Berryhill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIMS Press 2017-04-01
Series:AIMS Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aimspress.com/neuroscience/article/1388/fulltext.html
id doaj-2978ffec964f48c2b02f70f334f94a92
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2978ffec964f48c2b02f70f334f94a922020-11-25T01:23:00ZengAIMS PressAIMS Neuroscience2373-79722017-04-0142718610.3934/Neuroscience.2017.2.71Neurosci-04-00071Longitudinal tDCS: Consistency across Working Memory Training StudiesMarian E. Berryhill0Memory and Brain Lab, Program in Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Dept. of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557There is great interest in enhancing and maintaining cognitive function. In recent years, advances in noninvasive brain stimulation devices, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have targeted working memory in particular. Despite controversy surrounding outcomes of single-session studies, a growing field of working memory training studies incorporate multiple sessions of tDCS. It is useful to take stock of these findings because there is a diversity of paradigms employed and the outcomes observed between research groups. This will be important in assessing cognitive training programs paired with stimulation techniques and identifying the more useful and less effective approaches. Here, we treat the tDCS+ working memory training field as a case example, but also survey training benefits in other neuromodulatory techniques (e.g., tRNS, tACS). There are challenges associated with the broad parameter space including: individual differences, stimulation intensity, duration, montage, session number, session spacing, training task selection, timing of follow up testing, near and far transfer tasks. In summary, although the field of assisted cognitive training is young, some design choices are more favorable than others. By way of heuristic, the current evidence supports including more training/tDCS sessions (5+), applying anodal tDCS targeting prefrontal regions, including follow up testing on trained and transfer tasks after a period of no contact. What remains unclear, but important for future translational value is continuing work to pinpoint optimal values for the tDCS parameters on a per cognitive task basis. Importantly the emerging literature shows notable consistency in the application of tDCS for WM across various participant populations compared to single session experimental designs.http://www.aimspress.com/neuroscience/article/1388/fulltext.htmlworking memorytDCScognitive training
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marian E. Berryhill
spellingShingle Marian E. Berryhill
Longitudinal tDCS: Consistency across Working Memory Training Studies
AIMS Neuroscience
working memory
tDCS
cognitive training
author_facet Marian E. Berryhill
author_sort Marian E. Berryhill
title Longitudinal tDCS: Consistency across Working Memory Training Studies
title_short Longitudinal tDCS: Consistency across Working Memory Training Studies
title_full Longitudinal tDCS: Consistency across Working Memory Training Studies
title_fullStr Longitudinal tDCS: Consistency across Working Memory Training Studies
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal tDCS: Consistency across Working Memory Training Studies
title_sort longitudinal tdcs: consistency across working memory training studies
publisher AIMS Press
series AIMS Neuroscience
issn 2373-7972
publishDate 2017-04-01
description There is great interest in enhancing and maintaining cognitive function. In recent years, advances in noninvasive brain stimulation devices, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have targeted working memory in particular. Despite controversy surrounding outcomes of single-session studies, a growing field of working memory training studies incorporate multiple sessions of tDCS. It is useful to take stock of these findings because there is a diversity of paradigms employed and the outcomes observed between research groups. This will be important in assessing cognitive training programs paired with stimulation techniques and identifying the more useful and less effective approaches. Here, we treat the tDCS+ working memory training field as a case example, but also survey training benefits in other neuromodulatory techniques (e.g., tRNS, tACS). There are challenges associated with the broad parameter space including: individual differences, stimulation intensity, duration, montage, session number, session spacing, training task selection, timing of follow up testing, near and far transfer tasks. In summary, although the field of assisted cognitive training is young, some design choices are more favorable than others. By way of heuristic, the current evidence supports including more training/tDCS sessions (5+), applying anodal tDCS targeting prefrontal regions, including follow up testing on trained and transfer tasks after a period of no contact. What remains unclear, but important for future translational value is continuing work to pinpoint optimal values for the tDCS parameters on a per cognitive task basis. Importantly the emerging literature shows notable consistency in the application of tDCS for WM across various participant populations compared to single session experimental designs.
topic working memory
tDCS
cognitive training
url http://www.aimspress.com/neuroscience/article/1388/fulltext.html
work_keys_str_mv AT marianeberryhill longitudinaltdcsconsistencyacrossworkingmemorytrainingstudies
_version_ 1725124079341535232