Validity and Reliability Study of Two Different Portable Electro–Enzymatic Lactate Analysers

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliabilities of the Biosen C Line (BCL) laboratory and Lactate Scout (LS) hand-held portable lactate analyser within a wide range lactate concentration. LS analyser was compared to the BCL analyser (reference method) to evaluate its validity...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Halil İbrahim Kaya, Cem Çetin, Duygu Doğuç Kumbul, Mustafa Onur Serbest, Ali Erdoğan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Turkish Sports Medicine Association 2020-06-01
Series:Spor Hekimligi Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access: https://journalofsportsmedicine.org/eng/full-text-pdf/532/tur
id doaj-29a85e9b20c649fe83e07be0270431da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-29a85e9b20c649fe83e07be0270431da2020-11-25T03:14:12ZengTurkish Sports Medicine AssociationSpor Hekimligi Dergisi1300-05512587-14982020-06-0155213814710.5152/tjsm.2020.170532Validity and Reliability Study of Two Different Portable Electro–Enzymatic Lactate AnalysersHalil İbrahim Kaya0Cem Çetin1Duygu Doğuç Kumbul2Mustafa Onur Serbest3Ali Erdoğan4 Sports Medicine Section, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Samsun, Turkey Department of Sports Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey Sports Medicine Section, Aydın State Hospital, Aydın, Turkey Sports Medicine Unit, Gloria Sports Arena, Antalya, Turkey Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliabilities of the Biosen C Line (BCL) laboratory and Lactate Scout (LS) hand-held portable lactate analyser within a wide range lactate concentration. LS analyser was compared to the BCL analyser (reference method) to evaluate its validity. Materials and methods: Blood samples were taken during an incremental treadmill test under laboratory conditions. In order to evaluate reliability, 99 blood samples with lactate concentrations changed between 0.8-11.1 mM were measured twice. Results: For the LS analyser, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.994; typical error of measurement (TE) and coefficient of variation (CV) were 0.200 mM and 2.95%, respectively. For the BCL analyser, ICC was 1.000; TE and CV were 0.044 mM and 0.50%, respectively. LS hand-held portable- and BCL laboratory analysers’ reliability results show perfect accordance. In order to evaluate LS analyser reliability, 99 blood samples with lactate concentrations between 0.8-11.1 mM were also measured, giving a high validity coefficient of 0.976. Validity was also separately assessed for the three sample ranges of 5.0 mM, yielding ICC values of 0.862, 0.903 and 0.783, respectively. Comparing with the Bland & Altman method, LS and reference method mean lactic acid concentration difference was -0.097 mM, and limits of agreement -1.342 and 1.147 mM. Conclusion: The results of the study revealed that the LS analyser has high validity, however at concentrations higher than 5.0 mM, its measures are found significantly lower than those of the reference method. https://journalofsportsmedicine.org/eng/full-text-pdf/532/tur lactate analysisvalidityreliability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Halil İbrahim Kaya
Cem Çetin
Duygu Doğuç Kumbul
Mustafa Onur Serbest
Ali Erdoğan
spellingShingle Halil İbrahim Kaya
Cem Çetin
Duygu Doğuç Kumbul
Mustafa Onur Serbest
Ali Erdoğan
Validity and Reliability Study of Two Different Portable Electro–Enzymatic Lactate Analysers
Spor Hekimligi Dergisi
lactate analysis
validity
reliability
author_facet Halil İbrahim Kaya
Cem Çetin
Duygu Doğuç Kumbul
Mustafa Onur Serbest
Ali Erdoğan
author_sort Halil İbrahim Kaya
title Validity and Reliability Study of Two Different Portable Electro–Enzymatic Lactate Analysers
title_short Validity and Reliability Study of Two Different Portable Electro–Enzymatic Lactate Analysers
title_full Validity and Reliability Study of Two Different Portable Electro–Enzymatic Lactate Analysers
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability Study of Two Different Portable Electro–Enzymatic Lactate Analysers
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability Study of Two Different Portable Electro–Enzymatic Lactate Analysers
title_sort validity and reliability study of two different portable electro–enzymatic lactate analysers
publisher Turkish Sports Medicine Association
series Spor Hekimligi Dergisi
issn 1300-0551
2587-1498
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliabilities of the Biosen C Line (BCL) laboratory and Lactate Scout (LS) hand-held portable lactate analyser within a wide range lactate concentration. LS analyser was compared to the BCL analyser (reference method) to evaluate its validity. Materials and methods: Blood samples were taken during an incremental treadmill test under laboratory conditions. In order to evaluate reliability, 99 blood samples with lactate concentrations changed between 0.8-11.1 mM were measured twice. Results: For the LS analyser, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.994; typical error of measurement (TE) and coefficient of variation (CV) were 0.200 mM and 2.95%, respectively. For the BCL analyser, ICC was 1.000; TE and CV were 0.044 mM and 0.50%, respectively. LS hand-held portable- and BCL laboratory analysers’ reliability results show perfect accordance. In order to evaluate LS analyser reliability, 99 blood samples with lactate concentrations between 0.8-11.1 mM were also measured, giving a high validity coefficient of 0.976. Validity was also separately assessed for the three sample ranges of 5.0 mM, yielding ICC values of 0.862, 0.903 and 0.783, respectively. Comparing with the Bland & Altman method, LS and reference method mean lactic acid concentration difference was -0.097 mM, and limits of agreement -1.342 and 1.147 mM. Conclusion: The results of the study revealed that the LS analyser has high validity, however at concentrations higher than 5.0 mM, its measures are found significantly lower than those of the reference method.
topic lactate analysis
validity
reliability
url https://journalofsportsmedicine.org/eng/full-text-pdf/532/tur
work_keys_str_mv AT halilibrahimkaya validityandreliabilitystudyoftwodifferentportableelectroenzymaticlactateanalysers
AT cemcetin validityandreliabilitystudyoftwodifferentportableelectroenzymaticlactateanalysers
AT duygudoguckumbul validityandreliabilitystudyoftwodifferentportableelectroenzymaticlactateanalysers
AT mustafaonurserbest validityandreliabilitystudyoftwodifferentportableelectroenzymaticlactateanalysers
AT alierdogan validityandreliabilitystudyoftwodifferentportableelectroenzymaticlactateanalysers
_version_ 1724643962246922240