Clinical and molecular distinctions in patients with refractory colon cancer who benefit from regorafenib treatment

Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY 73-4506; Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany) is a novel oral multikinase inhibitor that blocks the activity of several protein kinases. However, few guidelines exist for novel biomarkers to select patients who will likely benefit from regorafenib treatment. Metastatic colore...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Min-Sang Lee, Hee Jin Cho, Jung Yong Hong, Jeeyun Lee, Se Hoon Park, Joon Oh Park, Young Suk Park, Ho Yeong Lim, Won Ki Kang, Yong Beom Cho, Seung Tae Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-11-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835920965842
id doaj-29ae88786d674ce1aeabdeed64aae596
record_format Article
spelling doaj-29ae88786d674ce1aeabdeed64aae5962020-11-25T04:05:22ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology1758-83592020-11-011210.1177/1758835920965842Clinical and molecular distinctions in patients with refractory colon cancer who benefit from regorafenib treatmentMin-Sang LeeHee Jin ChoJung Yong HongJeeyun LeeSe Hoon ParkJoon Oh ParkYoung Suk ParkHo Yeong LimWon Ki KangYong Beom ChoSeung Tae KimRegorafenib (Stivarga, BAY 73-4506; Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany) is a novel oral multikinase inhibitor that blocks the activity of several protein kinases. However, few guidelines exist for novel biomarkers to select patients who will likely benefit from regorafenib treatment. Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with regorafenib were evaluated in this study. Tumor tissues of these patients were subjected to next-generation sequencing-based cancer panel tests. The relationship between molecular profiling and efficacy of regorafenib was analyzed. Among the 76 mCRC patients, the median age was 58 years (range 22–79 years), and 73.7% received regorafenib as a third-line therapy. The primary tumor locations were the right side ( n  = 15, 19.8%) and the left side ( n  = 61, 80.2%). Most patients (97.4%) had received prior anti-angiogenetic agents, and a prior anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) agent had been administered to 32.9%. Of these 76 patients, 65 were evaluated to determine the efficacy of treatment. We observed zero complete responses, seven confirmed partial responses (PR 9.2%), 26 stable disease states (34.2%), and 32 disease progressions (42.1%). The overall confirmed response rate and the disease control rate were 9.2% and 43.4%, respectively. Genomic analysis revealed that APC mutations were significant in patients who demonstrated a tumor response to regorafenib ( p  < 0.05). Interestingly, FGFR1 amplification was detected in only three of 76 patients (3.9%), and these three patients achieved a PR to regorafenib. The median progression-free survival time was 2.8 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.6–4.0). Patients with BRAF mutation and/or SMAD4 mutation had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) than those without such a mutation. On pathway analysis, Tumor Growth Factor (TGF)-beta pathways were significantly associated with worse PFS. We found that efficacy of regorafenib might be correlated with specific genetic aberrations, such as APC mutation and FGFR1 amplification. In addition, SMAD4 mutation and TGF-beta pathway were associated with worse PFS after regorafenib. We found that efficacy of regorafenib might be correlated with specific genetic aberrations, such as APC mutation and FGFR1 amplification. In addition, SMAD4 mutation and the TGF-beta pathway were associated with worse PFS after regorafenib.https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835920965842
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Min-Sang Lee
Hee Jin Cho
Jung Yong Hong
Jeeyun Lee
Se Hoon Park
Joon Oh Park
Young Suk Park
Ho Yeong Lim
Won Ki Kang
Yong Beom Cho
Seung Tae Kim
spellingShingle Min-Sang Lee
Hee Jin Cho
Jung Yong Hong
Jeeyun Lee
Se Hoon Park
Joon Oh Park
Young Suk Park
Ho Yeong Lim
Won Ki Kang
Yong Beom Cho
Seung Tae Kim
Clinical and molecular distinctions in patients with refractory colon cancer who benefit from regorafenib treatment
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
author_facet Min-Sang Lee
Hee Jin Cho
Jung Yong Hong
Jeeyun Lee
Se Hoon Park
Joon Oh Park
Young Suk Park
Ho Yeong Lim
Won Ki Kang
Yong Beom Cho
Seung Tae Kim
author_sort Min-Sang Lee
title Clinical and molecular distinctions in patients with refractory colon cancer who benefit from regorafenib treatment
title_short Clinical and molecular distinctions in patients with refractory colon cancer who benefit from regorafenib treatment
title_full Clinical and molecular distinctions in patients with refractory colon cancer who benefit from regorafenib treatment
title_fullStr Clinical and molecular distinctions in patients with refractory colon cancer who benefit from regorafenib treatment
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and molecular distinctions in patients with refractory colon cancer who benefit from regorafenib treatment
title_sort clinical and molecular distinctions in patients with refractory colon cancer who benefit from regorafenib treatment
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
issn 1758-8359
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY 73-4506; Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany) is a novel oral multikinase inhibitor that blocks the activity of several protein kinases. However, few guidelines exist for novel biomarkers to select patients who will likely benefit from regorafenib treatment. Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with regorafenib were evaluated in this study. Tumor tissues of these patients were subjected to next-generation sequencing-based cancer panel tests. The relationship between molecular profiling and efficacy of regorafenib was analyzed. Among the 76 mCRC patients, the median age was 58 years (range 22–79 years), and 73.7% received regorafenib as a third-line therapy. The primary tumor locations were the right side ( n  = 15, 19.8%) and the left side ( n  = 61, 80.2%). Most patients (97.4%) had received prior anti-angiogenetic agents, and a prior anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) agent had been administered to 32.9%. Of these 76 patients, 65 were evaluated to determine the efficacy of treatment. We observed zero complete responses, seven confirmed partial responses (PR 9.2%), 26 stable disease states (34.2%), and 32 disease progressions (42.1%). The overall confirmed response rate and the disease control rate were 9.2% and 43.4%, respectively. Genomic analysis revealed that APC mutations were significant in patients who demonstrated a tumor response to regorafenib ( p  < 0.05). Interestingly, FGFR1 amplification was detected in only three of 76 patients (3.9%), and these three patients achieved a PR to regorafenib. The median progression-free survival time was 2.8 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.6–4.0). Patients with BRAF mutation and/or SMAD4 mutation had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) than those without such a mutation. On pathway analysis, Tumor Growth Factor (TGF)-beta pathways were significantly associated with worse PFS. We found that efficacy of regorafenib might be correlated with specific genetic aberrations, such as APC mutation and FGFR1 amplification. In addition, SMAD4 mutation and TGF-beta pathway were associated with worse PFS after regorafenib. We found that efficacy of regorafenib might be correlated with specific genetic aberrations, such as APC mutation and FGFR1 amplification. In addition, SMAD4 mutation and the TGF-beta pathway were associated with worse PFS after regorafenib.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835920965842
work_keys_str_mv AT minsanglee clinicalandmoleculardistinctionsinpatientswithrefractorycoloncancerwhobenefitfromregorafenibtreatment
AT heejincho clinicalandmoleculardistinctionsinpatientswithrefractorycoloncancerwhobenefitfromregorafenibtreatment
AT jungyonghong clinicalandmoleculardistinctionsinpatientswithrefractorycoloncancerwhobenefitfromregorafenibtreatment
AT jeeyunlee clinicalandmoleculardistinctionsinpatientswithrefractorycoloncancerwhobenefitfromregorafenibtreatment
AT sehoonpark clinicalandmoleculardistinctionsinpatientswithrefractorycoloncancerwhobenefitfromregorafenibtreatment
AT joonohpark clinicalandmoleculardistinctionsinpatientswithrefractorycoloncancerwhobenefitfromregorafenibtreatment
AT youngsukpark clinicalandmoleculardistinctionsinpatientswithrefractorycoloncancerwhobenefitfromregorafenibtreatment
AT hoyeonglim clinicalandmoleculardistinctionsinpatientswithrefractorycoloncancerwhobenefitfromregorafenibtreatment
AT wonkikang clinicalandmoleculardistinctionsinpatientswithrefractorycoloncancerwhobenefitfromregorafenibtreatment
AT yongbeomcho clinicalandmoleculardistinctionsinpatientswithrefractorycoloncancerwhobenefitfromregorafenibtreatment
AT seungtaekim clinicalandmoleculardistinctionsinpatientswithrefractorycoloncancerwhobenefitfromregorafenibtreatment
_version_ 1724434436486856704