Inference of transposable element ancestry.

Most common methods for inferring transposable element (TE) evolutionary relationships are based on dividing TEs into subfamilies using shared diagnostic nucleotides. Although originally justified based on the "master gene" model of TE evolution, computational and experimental work indicat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aaron C Wacholder, Corey Cox, Thomas J Meyer, Robert P Ruggiero, Vijetha Vemulapalli, Annette Damert, Lucia Carbone, David D Pollock
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-08-01
Series:PLoS Genetics
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4133154?pdf=render
id doaj-29bc2fe4c52c446b9efe11f07717252d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-29bc2fe4c52c446b9efe11f07717252d2020-11-24T21:41:58ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Genetics1553-73901553-74042014-08-01108e100448210.1371/journal.pgen.1004482Inference of transposable element ancestry.Aaron C WacholderCorey CoxThomas J MeyerRobert P RuggieroVijetha VemulapalliAnnette DamertLucia CarboneDavid D PollockMost common methods for inferring transposable element (TE) evolutionary relationships are based on dividing TEs into subfamilies using shared diagnostic nucleotides. Although originally justified based on the "master gene" model of TE evolution, computational and experimental work indicates that many of the subfamilies generated by these methods contain multiple source elements. This implies that subfamily-based methods give an incomplete picture of TE relationships. Studies on selection, functional exaptation, and predictions of horizontal transfer may all be affected. Here, we develop a Bayesian method for inferring TE ancestry that gives the probability that each sequence was replicative, its frequency of replication, and the probability that each extant TE sequence came from each possible ancestral sequence. Applying our method to 986 members of the newly-discovered LAVA family of TEs, we show that there were far more source elements in the history of LAVA expansion than subfamilies identified using the CoSeg subfamily-classification program. We also identify multiple replicative elements in the AluSc subfamily in humans. Our results strongly indicate that a reassessment of subfamily structures is necessary to obtain accurate estimates of mutation processes, phylogenetic relationships and historical times of activity.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4133154?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aaron C Wacholder
Corey Cox
Thomas J Meyer
Robert P Ruggiero
Vijetha Vemulapalli
Annette Damert
Lucia Carbone
David D Pollock
spellingShingle Aaron C Wacholder
Corey Cox
Thomas J Meyer
Robert P Ruggiero
Vijetha Vemulapalli
Annette Damert
Lucia Carbone
David D Pollock
Inference of transposable element ancestry.
PLoS Genetics
author_facet Aaron C Wacholder
Corey Cox
Thomas J Meyer
Robert P Ruggiero
Vijetha Vemulapalli
Annette Damert
Lucia Carbone
David D Pollock
author_sort Aaron C Wacholder
title Inference of transposable element ancestry.
title_short Inference of transposable element ancestry.
title_full Inference of transposable element ancestry.
title_fullStr Inference of transposable element ancestry.
title_full_unstemmed Inference of transposable element ancestry.
title_sort inference of transposable element ancestry.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Genetics
issn 1553-7390
1553-7404
publishDate 2014-08-01
description Most common methods for inferring transposable element (TE) evolutionary relationships are based on dividing TEs into subfamilies using shared diagnostic nucleotides. Although originally justified based on the "master gene" model of TE evolution, computational and experimental work indicates that many of the subfamilies generated by these methods contain multiple source elements. This implies that subfamily-based methods give an incomplete picture of TE relationships. Studies on selection, functional exaptation, and predictions of horizontal transfer may all be affected. Here, we develop a Bayesian method for inferring TE ancestry that gives the probability that each sequence was replicative, its frequency of replication, and the probability that each extant TE sequence came from each possible ancestral sequence. Applying our method to 986 members of the newly-discovered LAVA family of TEs, we show that there were far more source elements in the history of LAVA expansion than subfamilies identified using the CoSeg subfamily-classification program. We also identify multiple replicative elements in the AluSc subfamily in humans. Our results strongly indicate that a reassessment of subfamily structures is necessary to obtain accurate estimates of mutation processes, phylogenetic relationships and historical times of activity.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4133154?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT aaroncwacholder inferenceoftransposableelementancestry
AT coreycox inferenceoftransposableelementancestry
AT thomasjmeyer inferenceoftransposableelementancestry
AT robertpruggiero inferenceoftransposableelementancestry
AT vijethavemulapalli inferenceoftransposableelementancestry
AT annettedamert inferenceoftransposableelementancestry
AT luciacarbone inferenceoftransposableelementancestry
AT daviddpollock inferenceoftransposableelementancestry
_version_ 1725919730652413952