Does prior mediastinal lymph node aspiration contribute to false-positive positron emission tomography–computed tomography?

• Main Authors: J. Michael Ramsahai, Christine Molnar, Lawrence Lou, Winston Ying, Paul MacEachern, Christopher A. Hergott, Elaine Dumoulin, Nadine Strilchuk, Marc Fortin, Alain Tremblay
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: European Respiratory Society 2020-10-01
• Series: ERJ Open Research
• Online Access: http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/6/4/00103-2020.full

Background Proper staging of the mediastinum is an essential component of lung cancer evaluation. Positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PETCT) and endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are an integral part of this process. False-positive PETCT results can occur following surgical procedures but has not been demonstrated following EBUS-TBNA. We aimed to determine whether false-positive PETCT rates increase when EBUS-TBNA is performed prior to PETCT. Study design and methods A retrospective review was carried out of clinical cases that underwent both PETCT and EBUS-TBNA within 30 days for the suspected malignancy. The impact of test sequence on the PETCT false-positive rate (FPR) was determined using Generalised Estimating Equation logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 675 lymph node stations were sampled and imaged on PETCT. Overall, 332 (49.2%) nodes were sampled by EBUS-TBNA before PETCT, and 343 (50.8%) afterwards, with the interval between EBUS and subsequent PETCT being a mean±sd of 11.6±6.8 days (range 1–29). The FPR on qualitative PETCT for the EBUS first group was 41 (23.2%) out of 164, and for PETCT first it was 57 (29.0%) out of 193 for a difference of 5.8% (95% CI −3.4–14.7, p=0.22). In the regression model, EBUS as the first test was associated with a lower FPR when using the clinical PETCT interpretation. Interpretation The performance of EBUS-TBNA sampling did not influence the FPR of PETCT when bronchoscopy took place in the 30 days prior to testing. Test sequence should be selected based on other clinical considerations.