Framework, Procedure, and Tools for Comprehensive Evaluation of Sustainable Stormwater Management: A Review

To better evaluate and enhance the performance and benefit of sustainable stormwater management (SSWM) in developing countries, this study proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework based on thorough literature review. This framework re-classifies evaluation goals and indicators into four aspects...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tiange Wu, Haihong Song, Jianbin Wang, Eran Friedler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/5/1231
id doaj-2a4c5c8d1bca48f8b0b7108729b33ffe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2a4c5c8d1bca48f8b0b7108729b33ffe2020-11-25T03:31:16ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412020-04-01121231123110.3390/w12051231Framework, Procedure, and Tools for Comprehensive Evaluation of Sustainable Stormwater Management: A ReviewTiange Wu0Haihong Song1Jianbin Wang2Eran Friedler3Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, ChinaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, ChinaCooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne 3800, AustraliaFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, IsraelTo better evaluate and enhance the performance and benefit of sustainable stormwater management (SSWM) in developing countries, this study proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework based on thorough literature review. This framework re-classifies evaluation goals and indicators into four aspects—stormwater system, integrated management, social engagement, and urban development. The purpose of this review is to provide a guideline for decision makers to choose appropriate goals and indicators according to different regional context. Meanwhile, a structured procedure for comprehensive evaluation of SSWM is proposed to guide a well-organised decision-making process. Furthermore, pros and cons of eight decision support tools, as well as their functional focus, are compared, aiming to provide references for SSWM in developing countries. Outcomes presented in this review are expected to support decision makers in the process of screening optimal SSWM strategies and monitoring SSWM projects.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/5/1231comprehensive evaluation frameworkstormwater managementdecision support toolsponge city
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tiange Wu
Haihong Song
Jianbin Wang
Eran Friedler
spellingShingle Tiange Wu
Haihong Song
Jianbin Wang
Eran Friedler
Framework, Procedure, and Tools for Comprehensive Evaluation of Sustainable Stormwater Management: A Review
Water
comprehensive evaluation framework
stormwater management
decision support tool
sponge city
author_facet Tiange Wu
Haihong Song
Jianbin Wang
Eran Friedler
author_sort Tiange Wu
title Framework, Procedure, and Tools for Comprehensive Evaluation of Sustainable Stormwater Management: A Review
title_short Framework, Procedure, and Tools for Comprehensive Evaluation of Sustainable Stormwater Management: A Review
title_full Framework, Procedure, and Tools for Comprehensive Evaluation of Sustainable Stormwater Management: A Review
title_fullStr Framework, Procedure, and Tools for Comprehensive Evaluation of Sustainable Stormwater Management: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Framework, Procedure, and Tools for Comprehensive Evaluation of Sustainable Stormwater Management: A Review
title_sort framework, procedure, and tools for comprehensive evaluation of sustainable stormwater management: a review
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2020-04-01
description To better evaluate and enhance the performance and benefit of sustainable stormwater management (SSWM) in developing countries, this study proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework based on thorough literature review. This framework re-classifies evaluation goals and indicators into four aspects—stormwater system, integrated management, social engagement, and urban development. The purpose of this review is to provide a guideline for decision makers to choose appropriate goals and indicators according to different regional context. Meanwhile, a structured procedure for comprehensive evaluation of SSWM is proposed to guide a well-organised decision-making process. Furthermore, pros and cons of eight decision support tools, as well as their functional focus, are compared, aiming to provide references for SSWM in developing countries. Outcomes presented in this review are expected to support decision makers in the process of screening optimal SSWM strategies and monitoring SSWM projects.
topic comprehensive evaluation framework
stormwater management
decision support tool
sponge city
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/5/1231
work_keys_str_mv AT tiangewu frameworkprocedureandtoolsforcomprehensiveevaluationofsustainablestormwatermanagementareview
AT haihongsong frameworkprocedureandtoolsforcomprehensiveevaluationofsustainablestormwatermanagementareview
AT jianbinwang frameworkprocedureandtoolsforcomprehensiveevaluationofsustainablestormwatermanagementareview
AT eranfriedler frameworkprocedureandtoolsforcomprehensiveevaluationofsustainablestormwatermanagementareview
_version_ 1724572560752902144